2016 Podcasts

Watch Live Every Friday at 10:00am (Eastern) >> CellularHealing.TV <<

107: The Power of the Paleo Diet with Dr. Terry Wahls

Transcript of Episode 107: The Power of the Paleo Diet with Dr. Terry Wahls

With Dr. Daniel Pompa and special guest Dr. Terry Wahls.

Dr. Pompa:
Welcome to episode 107. First thing you all noticed right away is Meredith is not here, right? She was at a seminar with me teaching in Ogden, Utah, so she was still on a plane, but I’m here. I’m here with a very special guest that was really tough to book because she’s a busy woman. Her name is Dr. Terry Wahls. Dr. Terry, thank you so much for being here.

Dr. Wahls:
You’re very welcome. I’m honored.

Dr. Pompa:
Thank you. I know you’re busy, and it was hard to get here. We are grateful. I want to just read your bio for people. Usually, that’s Meredith’s job, but I’ll do the best I can. Then I just can’t wait to break into this conversation with you.

Dr. Terry Wahls is a clinical professor of medicine at the University of Iowa, and director of the Extended Care and Rehab Service line at the Veteran Affairs Iowa City healthcare system. She is also a patient with secondary progressive multiple sclerosis, which confined her to a wheelchair for four years, which makes her story very extraordinary, I’ll tell you. Dr. Wahls restored her health using diet and lifestyle programs similar to what we do, go figure. She designed specifically for her brain. She also tests these principles in clinical trials, which I can’t wait to hear about. She is the author of The Wahls Protocol, which is a radical new way to treat all chronic autoimmune conditions using paleo principles. Gosh, I said before we got on here, Dr. Terry, that it’s inevitable that you and I have met. I have such a passion for autoimmune and these brain conditions that are now, I believe, epidemic.

Dr. Wahls:
Absolutely.

Dr. Pompa:
Unfortunately, modern medicine is not going upstream to the cause. They’re just throwing medications at it, which, at best, put the symptoms off for a little while, but really have no answer whatsoever. Terry, I just want you to tell your story because I know we have a lot of people watching with multiple types of autoimmune. I want you to tell that story.

Dr. Wahls:
I’m an academic general internal medicine doc. I believe very much in the best drugs, newest treatments, etc. In 2000, I was diagnosed with multiple sclerosis on the basis of a new problem with my left leg and a history of visual dimming in my left eye 13 years earlier. At that time, I knew the natural history was that within ten years of diagnosis, one half would develop severe fatigue, unable to work, and that one third would have problems walking, needing a cane, walker, or wheelchair. I decided to find the best clinical centers I could find, so I went to the Cleveland Clinic because they did a lot of clinical research. I saw their best people and took the newest, latest drugs. I saw the best people here at the University of Iowa.

Still, within three years, my disease had transitioned from relapsing-remitting, where you can have periods of improvement and worsening, to the secondary progressive phase, where you expect steady decline and loss of function. I took the recommended mitoxantrone, got the tilt-recline wheelchair, and then I began reading the basic science, reading about the analytical models for multiple sclerosis, Parkinson’s, Alzheimer’s, Lou Gehrig’s, Huntington’s disease, and would begin to experiment on myself based on what I was reading in the mice and rats. Time progressed, and I discovered the paleo diet. After 20 years of being vegetarian, I went back to eating meat.

Dr. Pompa:
By the way, Terry, which I would argue was part of the problem.

Dr. Wahls:
I agree. Certainly, the way I interpreted vegetarianism probably contributed to my illness. In 2002, while I was still walking around, I discovered the paleo diet, removed all grain, all legumes, all dairy, introduced meats, and continued to decline. I’m reading the basic science, adding vitamins and supplements. I’m still declining, but more slowly. The summer of 2007, I’m so weak I cannot sit up in a regular chair. I have a zero gravity chair recliner at work, another at home, or I’m in bed. I’m losing my keys. I’m losing my phone. I have a detailed notebook to keep track of what I need to do.

My chief of staff calls me in and says, “I’m going to assign you to the traumatic brain injury clinic beginning in January. There will be no residents. You’ll be seeing patients’ direct care along with the team,” and I know I can’t do that job. Then it’s like, okay, it’s pretty clear that I’m going to have to take medical retirement soon, but a few weeks later, I discovered the Institute for Functional Medicine. They have a course in neuroprotection, a functional medicine approach to common and uncommon neurological conditions. I get that course. I go through the presentations and the readings. I go over it and over it. I have a longer list of vitamins and supplements; now, I’m up to 20 different things.

Then I have this brilliant awakening that I should use this list of 20 nutrients to figure out what kind of foods I should be stressing in my diet. That’s more research, to figure out what foods am I going to be doing. On January 1, I start this new protocol. Instead of just taking things out, I’m really emphasizing what I need to be eating every day. That’s when the magic begins. Within three months, my fatigue is gone. My brain fog is rapidly diminishing. I have to go off Provigil because the fatigue is gone, and I can’t sleep at night. At six months, I’m walking around without a cane. I see my neurologist, and I tell him I want to go off the disease-modifying drugs. He agrees, and we taper and discontinue the CellCept.

At nine months, I get up and I get on my bicycle, and I pedal around the block for the first time in about six years. I’m crying. My kids are crying. That’s the first time I’m like, “Nobody knows what’s happening, how much recovery might be possible.” At 12 months, I do a 20-mile bike ride with my family. Now, mind you, I did have to, every five miles, stop, lay down on the grass, rest for a few minutes, and then get up on my bike.

Dr. Pompa:
After all, you’d been sick for eight years.

Dr. Wahls:
Yeah, for a long time. That really transformed my understanding of disease and health. It would change my clinical practice. My chair of medicine called me and said this is really important and told me to write up a case report. We got it written up. Then he called me in and said, “We’ve got to do a little clinical trial,” so I wrote up a protocol, wrote a little grant, and I got funding from a group in Canada, Direct-MS Charity, and we did our clinical trial, which we’ve published. We enrolled people with secondary and primary progressive MS, people you wouldn’t expect to get better, and we emulated the same protocol that I did, the same diet, same stress reduction, and exercise system.

We had a large reduction in fatigue and a marked improvement in quality of life. We had the gait paper changes; that’s under review. We’re writing up the cognitive changes, which were also quite remarkable. Hopefully, we’ll be submitting that here in the near future. I’ve done a couple more studies. The MS Society is reviewing grants for us. The research program in my lab is growing. The VA, in the meantime, took me out of primary care, took me out of the traumatic brain injury clinic, and we now have basically a functional medicine clinic that I call the Therapeutic Lifestyle Clinic, where I’m teaching people who are willing these concepts. We’re seeing very exciting results across a wide variety of disease states.

Dr. Pompa:
I’d have to say that if you were pursuing this in the university, in the hospital setting, or the regular medical environment without your story, you probably wouldn’t have been well-received like you have been. Would you agree with that?

Dr. Wahls:
When I first started doing this, when I first changed, I began talking to my vets about the quality of their diet, vitamins, and fish oil, and not talking much about drugs. My primary care colleagues and my direct brain injury colleagues started complaining to the chief of staff, saying, “What’s Wahls doing? This is not FDA approved stuff.” He called me in, and I brought in 85 papers, and went through this, and said, “I’m just doing the latest science.” My chief of staff did become a huge fan. He said, “If Dr. Wahls hurts somebody, I need to hear about it, but if she’s talking vegetables and vitamins, she’s fine.”

It was then seen as an oddity and tolerated, but two things happened. One, clinical trials were going on; at research week, people were seeing the preliminary data coming back with amazing results, then they started seeing the videos with amazing results. That got more stature. Then the clinical outcomes began to speak for themselves in the traumatic brain injury clinic and in primary care. Then the next thing that happens, the chief of medicine comes to see me and says, “I would like to take you out of primary care and have you run your own clinic.” That was three years ago. Now, we have the Therapeutic Lifestyle Clinic, and that continues to grow. I’m training two other physicians to be in this with me. In the pain clinic, we are now emphasizing functional medicine. I’m sending physicians off there to get trained in functional medicine.

Dr. Pompa:
That’s fantastic. Out of my story came greater purpose in leading people to the truth; there’s so little answers, really. It’s the same with you. The irony is you and I got sick around the same time. The back of 1999 right into 2000 is when the bottom of my life fell out, too. Both of us hit the wall at the same time. Unlike you, I was living a pretty good diet and exercising. I had two amalgam fillings drilled out, and mercury vapor went, and my life fell apart.

Dr. Wahls:
Yeah. I had to get that ill, that disabled, in order to have my current understanding of medicine be completely reevaluated. My prior research program was in diagnostic care, secondary data analysis. Everything that I knew, that’s all a former life. Now, I have a very different purpose and mission.

Dr. Pompa:
Exactly. It redefines us. A lot of your message now, I’m sure, is absolutely contrary and 180 degrees opposite of what you thought before.

Dr. Wahls:
Yeah.

Dr. Pompa:
You were all about a low-fat diet, right?

Dr. Wahls:
Low-fat diet. I thought a vegetarian diet was most ideal. I thought diagnose quickly and treat with medication or surgical intervention procedures as needed. I thought people were wasting their money on these vitamins and supplements. Now, of course, I realize they’re wasting their money if they’re thinking that drugs will fix a bad diet and lifestyle problem.

Dr. Pompa:
I agree. I think we both agree there’s a time and place for medication, but when we’re dealing with the chronic illnesses that we are today, it’s symptom-chasing at best, and typically creating more symptoms.

Dr. Wahls:
Creating more problems, more nutrient deficiencies, more biologic dysfunction, absolutely.

Dr. Pompa:
Absolutely. I always say, “Gosh, if there was this world that you were allowed to use medicine in this acute phase, and if you went beyond there, then there was a law that you weren’t allowed to be on it, I’d bet we’d save more lives.” That’s another topic.

Dr. Wahls:
Yeah. If it had gotten sunsetted after 30 days…

Dr. Pompa:
Yeah, exactly. Imagine that, right? After that is when it goes downhill and we start creating more disease, as you pointed out. I’m a firm believer in, obviously, fat heals the brain, but society and the media would say the opposite; fat’s bad, let’s run from it. Here, for you and I, fat was part of both our healings. Talk a little bit about that.

Dr. Wahls:
Let’s first talk a little bit about how fat became demonized. During World War I and World War II, the death rates for autoimmunity, heart disease, and cancers declined. Epidemiologists looked at that data, and they saw that fat intake during that time declined, and so they attributed fat to being the problem. Because cholesterol is very loosely correlated with heart disease, it seemed to make sense. There was a political drive to do something about the obesity epidemic, and so that seemed to be the right thing. The NIH ended up funding some research and putting a lot of money into the fat hypothesis. There’s a lot of drug development.

If you drove cholesterol down really far, you do save some heart attacks. You cause increased rates of homicide, suicide, depression, and dementia. That all caused mortality to not change. Now, that has been reexamined, and we realize that we can make the same conclusions about sugar. Sugar intake went dramatically down also during World War I and World War II. People were encouraged to grow their own vegetables and eat from their garden, so the vegetable intake actually went up during that time period. That’s the history of how we got sidetracked into the fat problem.

Dr. Pompa:
Ancel Keys had a big role in that, remember, in Time magazine?

Dr. Wahls:
Yep. Ancel Keys was the big epidemiologist who said fat is the problem; we could take that same data and say sugar is the problem.

Dr. Pompa:
You could take the same data and actually say fat was a good thing. The countries that he took in that study really played a role.

Dr. Wahls:
Absolutely. Now, if we look at the biochemistry of it, we need fat. We need cholesterol. We need saturated fat. We need some omega-3 and some omega-6. All of those things are in our cell membranes. If we drive our fat down, we don’t have as healthy of a cell membrane, which means we don’t have as healthy of a brain because we need cholesterol, saturated fat, omega-3, and omega-6 fat for all the myelin in my brain. We need those fats, and they act as cell-signaling in our brain, as well. It’s a huge problem if we fat-starve our brains as adults, and an even greater problem if we fat-starve our children’s brains.

Dr. Pompa:
There’s no doubt. The ratio of omega-3 and omega-6 is really shown to change brain functions. People are eating grain-fed animals with these ratios of omega-6 that are very high.

Dr. Wahls:
And all those corn oils, soybean oils, sunflower oils. All these oils are very high in omega-6. We’re heating those fats, making more trans fats as we cook with them.

Dr. Pompa:
Look at all the vegetable oils we’re heating.

Dr. Wahls:
It’s disastrous, absolutely disastrous.

Dr. Pompa:
We’re speaking the same language. Actually, I have something, Terry, that I teach, called my five R’s of cellular healing. I started teaching it just because I was having trouble communicating how to fix the cell to doctors, saying this is the key, so I developed the five R’s. Honestly, how it came to me was divine in nature, I’m telling you. R number one is you have to go upstream and remove the sources that drive information. Typically, these are toxic and stressors in nature. It could be chemical, physical, or emotional. R number two is fix the cell membrane, or regenerate the cell membrane, to get the R’s correctly. That’s where these fats come in, in the right ratios, fats like cholesterol and saturated fats, which have been demonized.

Dr. Wahls:
What ratio do you like to provide?

Dr. Pompa:
Obviously, in nature, we see from 1:1 omega-6 and omega-3, to 5:1 in nature. For brain fixing, I like a 4:1 ratio of omega-6.

Dr. Wahls:
Yes.

Dr. Pompa:
Yeah. Terry, I think we unite on this. I think that part of the problems we’re seeing today – here’s what I see – a lot of my listening audience, they’re all taking fish oils. Probably 80% of what they’re taking is rancid, but let’s say they get a good one, okay? In the beginning, because they’re omega-6 dominant from eating all the corn and grain-based stuff, it works and they see a positive. Then they pass that line of that ratio, and now what we’re finding is a lot of the health enthusiasts are omega-3 dominant. It’s a new problem. It takes cardiolipin out of the mitochondrial membrane, and it creates all these other new issues. Do you feel that? Do you see that, as well?

Dr. Wahls:
I think, ideally, you monitor the fatty acid ratio in cell membranes, so you know you aren’t overshooting. This is the problem: We use supplements as opposed to food, and we get ratios wrong. We don’t know when to stop, that we’ve got the tank back in the right direction. Nearly every nutrient has a U-shaped curve, even water. If you’re too low, big trouble. Nice broad range, we’re going to be okay. Too high, we’ll become toxic again. We’re suppressing the effect of the other correlate nutrients, in this case, omega-3 and omega-6, or zinc and copper. That’s why people, I think, will want to talk to you about supplements. I’m like, “I really like talking about food. I want you to have those supplement conversations with your healthcare practitioner so they can guide you so you don’t overshoot.”

Dr. Pompa:
Terry, I love when I unite with somebody. The 4:1 ratio of six to three, that targets the brain and the cell membrane, by the way, when we look at the studies – Warren Lyman there, completely.

Dr. Wahls:
Yeah.

Dr. Pompa:
I love that. The magic is oftentimes in the food, and you’re right. If you’re going to do this, doing it by yourself, you need a coach that understands this. Right?

Dr. Wahls:
Yeah.

Dr. Pompa:
There is no doubt about it, and it’s my goal, teaching doctors around the country. There are these balances that you can just drive. Listen, think about this, Terry. I know you experienced this. Four things that everyone that you see and I see, if we just get into a conversation with the public. They’re on a multivitamin, which is typically more toxic than it is good. They’re on vitamin D that’s not balanced with K, causing functional deficiencies in vitamin A. They’re typically just taking vitamin D.

Then there’s the probiotic that’s the same one they’ve been on for a year, which is causing dysbiosis. We’ll get to the microbiome in a moment. Then they’re on the fish oil, driving themselves in omega-3 dominance, and it’s probably rancid anyway. Am I right? Are those the four things that everyone in America is taking? They’re typically making themselves worse.

Dr. Wahls:
Certainly, a lot of folks are on those, and there’s a high likelihood of getting into trouble. Absolutely.

Dr. Pompa:
Yeah. It’s remarkable, honestly. When I talk about autoimmune, I like to put it in context of a three-legged stool, meaning that the three-legged stool – if one of these things isn’t there, you won’t probably get it. If one of these three things isn’t there, you probably won’t fix it. The one leg is a certain gene gets turned on. We have to change that epigenetic. We get the autoimmune of our genetic weakness.

The second leg is the stressors, physical, chemical, emotional, that trigger the gene. If we don’t get upstream to removing those, we typically won’t turn the gene off. The last leg is this gut issue. We know that certain bacteria, when missing, we can’t even make something called a T regulatory cell that actually turns off our immune system to say, “Hey, everything’s okay.” Now we have a society that has leaky gut, exposed to chemicals and things killing bacteria even from birth on.

Dr. Wahls:
[00:22:30]

Dr. Pompa:
Fixing the gut – going upstream and detoxing the cell, and taking the stressors away, and turning off the bad genes. Those three things is what I identify. Start with the microbiome because you have a lot of study here, and I want to hear from you on [00:22:47] gut. Why is it [00:22:49] fix it?

Dr. Wahls:
In the clinical trial that we’re doing right now, enrolling folks and putting them in either the Swank diet or the Wahls diet. We’re monitoring their microbiome, so they’re pooping in a cup for us. We’ll see how the microbiome is before they get enrolled because we’ll watch them for a few weeks. We enroll them. Then we’re going to monitor how the poop changes, and we’ll see the changes in the two diets.

Some of the observations I have so far is that there’s a lot of species variation in the census taking that we do. Then there’s metabolic measurements that we do to see – given the bacteria that live in my bowels, what are all the metabolic functions that they have for me? I think the problem is when we are – don’t have enough gut bacteria diversity, I don’t have all of the metabolic robustness that I should have.

We can replace that with the species. Which species I need may be different from person to person. What I’m really trying to do is fill in that metabolic hole. If I have 2,000 different species in my guts, I’m more likely to have a robust metabolic function of my bowels.

Dr. Pompa:
Right.

Dr. Wahls:
If I have only 600 species or only 500 species because I’ve taken so many antibiotics, and eat so much sugar, so few vegetables, I have far less metabolic robustness in my gut, which means there’s less metabolic activity that gets transferred across into my bloodstream going up to the portal vein, and my health suffers.

Dr. Pompa:
Stop there. Diversity, right? I read it in the studies, as well. Diversity is the key. My comment earlier, just taking the same darn probiotic really isn’t – let’s face it, Terry. It can help in the beginning. Of course, any probiotic, it can make a difference. Then it’s probably the same seven or eleven species that are in every probiotic out there. How do we gain this diversity? How are you gaining the diversity with the tools that we have?

Dr. Wahls:
Who lives in my bowels depends so completely on what I’m eating. If I want more diversity, I have to have more fiber, more soluble fiber, more resistant starch. If I’m not pooping two or three snakes a day, I need more of that stuff. Having more fermented vegetables, having a plateful of fermented red cabbage or kimchi adds far more diversity than a probiotic, adds much bigger numbers, and having nine cups of vegetables will do a lot of pooping for most people. If somehow it’s not enough, then I have them take more psyllium husk, or chia seed, or ground flax seed, or raw potato starch, or inulin, or larch. They can sort of take their pick. Frankly, I like them to be diverse.

The other thing that I tell people I do is I work on growing organic soil in my garden. I have a lot of root vegetables. I’ll so out, I’ll pull out my radishes, my onions. I wipe them off a little bit, get most of the dirt off, and then I eat them.

Dr. Pompa:
I want to hug you right now. This is my language. This is what I – you and I are very much in alignment on the microbiome. Very good.

Dr. Wahls:
You know, if we look at the hunting/gathering societies – the Hunza, they’ve got 1,200 different species, 1,600 different species in their guts. Then we’ve found the Yanomami, and had three times as much, so what are they eating? They’re eating some vegetables, some tubers, whatever they caught that day, and they’re not washing their hands a lot. They probably have a lot more exposure to dirt.

Dr. Pompa:
Yup.

Dr. Wahls:
I predict there may be a time that healthcare practitioners will be talking to people about growing dirt, and having organic dirt that we consume, and that we’re going to rely on our stomach acid to take out the troublesome bacteria, and that we’re going to shift our thinking on, “Is this bacteria a pathogen?” to “Is this community well-balanced so that all the metabolic functions I need are happening. Wait a minute. I’m missing some metabolic function, so I’m going to go get some more of this fermented cucumbers, or fermented squash, or fermented beets because they’re going to give me more of those bacterial species that I need.”

Dr. Pompa:
Boy, I tell you, I’m a big fan of all the fermented stuff you mentioned and all the dirt. Some of my favorite bacteria products are dirt. Zach Bush’s new product, Restore – I’m going to have him on here in a couple weeks.

Dr. Wahls:
Yeah.

Dr. Pompa:
It’s from seven layers deep in lignite. It’s dirt. We [00:28:28] dirt products.

Dr. Wahls:
We got so excited when we discovered bacteria and discovered some pathogens, but that’s far too simple. Life is a much more complicated interaction of all of these life forms, this whole ecosystem that each one of us is. If we want to be healthy, it’s like having to fix the health of the ecosystem of Flint, now that we have to fix their water.

Dr. Pompa:
I’m going this Thursday. They’re bringing me out there. I’m teaching doctors –

Dr. Wahls:
Ooh, excellent!

Dr. Pompa:
Yeah. They mayor’s going to be there. I’m teaching doctors on what I do, cellular detox and how to [00:29:09]

Dr. Wahls:
Ooh, excellent! Man, I am so glad to hear that!

Dr. Pompa:
Yeah.

Dr. Wahls:
Let me know. I’ll be delighted to promote your being there. That’s just wonderful to hear.

Dr. Pompa:
Yeah, absolutely. Thank you. I’m sure we’ll do more, but yeah, they’re flying me out there. I have a lot of the heads from the hospitals, the doctors, coming. It’s going to be a great opportunity to make a difference in a really horrible area. Sorry to interrupt you. I just got very excited about that when you said that.

Dr. Wahls:
It’s all about teaching people the human ecosystem. We have to clean our ecosystem, reduce the [00:29:40], get more vegetables, nourish our bacterial friends.

Dr. Pompa:
Yeah. No, absolutely. Our cleanly society, from not – hand washing, to antibiotics, overuse of antibiotics, to the hand sanitizers that are everywhere, to the hand sanitizer, antibacterial soaps. It’s remarkable. Then, of course, we’re putting glyphosate in our food system, which is the number one herbicide/pesticide in the world, that’s wiping out bacteria, as well. It’s not surprising that the majority of the population has a leaky gut and a dysbiosis of these bacteria that you and I understand not only affects your digestion, but affects your immunity, drives autoimmune, and also affects the brain because you can’t make the chemicals this brain works with without certain bacteria. This is the [00:30:33], Terry.

Dr. Wahls:
Absolutely. Glyphosate is in the rain. Glyphosate is in the rain, and so that has just profound implications for all of us. That’s going to get into the soil in my organic garden, as well.

Dr. Pompa:
Yeah. It’s devastating to the gut, microbiome, and it’s so sad what it’s doing to our children. I have five kids, and when they get in their thirties, I cannot imagine, Terry, the level of autoimmune that we’re driving. Think of it. Glyphosate turns on bad genes. Glyphosate causes a disruption in the microbiome. All legs of the stool, glyphosate fills, and it [00:31:23]

Dr. Wahls:
Yeah. Are you aware of Pottenger’s cats?

Dr. Pompa:
Yeah.

Dr. Wahls:
Yes. For the listeners, Pottenger –

Dr. Pompa:
Sorry. I’ve got my dog problem here.

Dr. Wahls:
We have dogs, too. I enjoy that. He did a series of experiments with cats, where he observed that if the cats were fed cooked meat, they’re clearly missing some nutrient, which led to congenital malformations that were more severe with each successive generations. I believe the fourth generation was the last generation that could reproduce. The fifth generation was sterile.

Now, it’s not exactly a corollary for us. If we go to World War II, that’s when, let’s say 1950, the use of chemicals in the food supply and in agriculture really became very, very intensive.

Dr. Pompa:
Yeah.

Dr. Wahls:
From 1950 to 2000, two generations, we’re the third generation. We see with each generation more serious behavioral problems in our children, higher rates of autism, higher rates of cancers. We’ve been seeing in the young adults higher rates of infertility, and of course, just higher rates of autoimmunity, obesity. Our fourth generation will be 2050. Will we be sterile? Will we have severely reduced fertility? I think it’s certainly quite possible.

Dr. Pompa:
Yeah. I do, too.

Dr. Wahls:
I’d also tell you I tend to be a half-full glass kind of person, so at the same time, the Internet was invented. It was the Internet that allowed me to make my personal discovery of functional medicine, the research that I was able to do to create the protocol which has restored my health and is restoring the health of millions.

Dr. Pompa:
Yeah.

Dr. Wahls:
Because of the Internet, the public is able to learn [00:33:37], stay current with the latest science. The government will never fix this. Insurance companies can’t do it. Businesses can’t do it, but we, the public, as long as we have access to the Internet, we can do these podcasts, do social media, tell our story. The people, some of us, at least, are going to figure this out.

Dr. Pompa:
Hey, Terry, as long as we keep our freedom, right, in this country? I always worry. You’re right. You’re right. I’m with you on that that it is this freedom that we’re able to enjoy.

Dr. Wahls:
As long as we can publish and talk to each other about our own personal experience – and I’m careful to always disclose my story. Research is ongoing. More stuff has to be answered. If these interventions sound pretty low-risk, vegetables and fiber, removing a few things that are not so good for you, try it, and see what you think.

Dr. Pompa:
[00:34:35] good fats that everyone’s telling you stay away from, the high fats –

Dr. Wahls:
Go have bacon and greens. They’re like –

Dr. Pompa:
Yeah.

Dr. Wahls:
One of the favorite things I get to say to vets in my class is my daughter and my kids had a favorite saying, “Bacon will fix any vegetable.” I tell the vets, “Yes. Cut up a couple pieces of bacon, fry them up, leave the fat in the skillet, add your vegetables, cook two minutes, and eat. If you don’t like it, add two more pieces of bacon the next time you make that dish. Keep adding it until you’re feeling good. You just need enough fat to cut the bitterness.”

Dr. Pompa:
It’s funny. I agree, totally. When you mentioned the Hunza people, it’s remarkable.

Dr. Wahls:
Yeah.

Dr. Pompa:
I’m going to put this in your head, and you can ponder it. I wrote an article called Diet Variation. I love to change the diet. I believe that it emulates what our ancestors were forced to do. When you look at the Hunza people, the British would go there. They would think that they were vegetarians. They would go in the summer, and they were just gathering some berries, and eating vegetables, and things. “Surely, they’re vegetarians.” They never went in the winter when all they were eating was lard, cheese, their fermented products that they could keep in the winter.

Dr. Wahls:
Yeah. Yeah. Yeah.

Dr. Pompa:
They weren’t eating vegetables. Something remarkable happened in the spring. They didn’t have food. They were in between. They ran out of meat and lards, and then they didn’t have their vegetables yet. They called it starvation spring. Terry, I emulate those cycles when I work with people. We do periodic fasts.

Dr. Wahls:
Oh, yeah.

Dr. Pompa:
We do even [00:36:12] fasts. We change the diet around at times because it forces this – the body to adapt, and bad cells have trouble adapting. Yeah. Check out my article.

Dr. Wahls:
Oh, that’s excellent.

Dr. Pompa:
When we study these tribes and these cultures that have just done so well, the variations that they were forced into really made them a stronger people.

Dr. Wahls:
They also have 200 different species that they eat. I talk about keep track. It’s sort of fun to do. Little notebook of the various plants you’re eating and the animals you’re eating, and are you going to make 200? When I started doing that, then I noticed my thinking changed. I go to the grocery store. There’s a new food that shows up. I’m like, “Oh, my god. I got to try that out because I’m working on my 200.”

Dr. Pompa:
Yeah. That’s great.

Dr. Wahls:
Then when I go down to the tea and spice aisle, it’s like, “Man, I got to try” – I try new teas, new spices because I’m very intentional. I want to be well beyond 200 different species.

Dr. Pompa:
It’s interesting. We’ve lost our relationship with plants. Not just plants as we think them, but herbs.

Dr. Wahls:
Yes. Yeah.

Dr. Pompa:
Think about it. Cultures were – herbs, and they were gatherers. Half of their vegetables – maybe not half, but a certain – a larger percent of their vegetables were actually herbs.

Dr. Wahls:
Yeah.

Dr. Pompa:
They utilized herbs.

Dr. Wahls:
They’re probably our original super-food.

Dr. Pompa:
Yeah.

Dr. Wahls:
They’re so powerful that the societies appreciated the tremendous healing capacity of those herbs, those plants. They became a part of their culinary tradition.

Dr. Pompa:
Yeah. Talk a little bit about methylation because you were a vegetarian.

Dr. Wahls:
Okay.

Dr. Pompa:
You said it, and I agree. Parts, not all – it was the vegetarian diet that possibly – methylation, the low fat, all that was part of it. Methylation, we know today, can turn off bad genes and protect genes, and surely, you and I both, at one point, were methyl depleted. Matter of fact, I said I have my 5 Rs. R number 5 is reestablishing methylation.

So many people today are methyl depleted because of stress. Whether it’s emotional, chemical, physical, it all depletes methylation. Talk a little bit about that because I know it’s part of what you do.

Dr. Wahls:
There’s the methylating factors in the B vitamins. For certainly vegetarians, they’re going to be low on B12. As we age and mature, get over 50 – I passed that a few years ago – again, your ability to make intrinsic factor declines.

Dr. Pompa:
Yeah.

Dr. Wahls:
We so commonly prescribe medications that lower stomach acid and also for the compromise your ability to make intrinsic factor. Organ meats, great source of B12. We don’t eat nearly enough of that, as well.

Dr. Pompa:
The Hunza [00:39:19] a lot of it. Yeah.

Dr. Wahls:
Yeah.

Dr. Pompa:
[00:39:20] a lot of it.

Dr. Wahls:
Our ancestors knew – would have had about 1/3 of their meat be organ meats. I have this lovely, lovely cookbook from my great grandmother, The Compendium of Cookery and Modern Book of Knowledge from 1857. They’re talking about eating the whole animal, eating the organ meats. That was a vital part of how you took care of your family.

Dr. Pompa:
Yeah.

Dr. Wahls:
Growing up, we had liver and onions every Friday night. My family eats liver and onions and organ meats quite regularly. Both my kids know how to make liver and onions in a very delicious way and boil bacon-wrapped chicken livers. That’s what we call our surprise yummies. We makes it for guests coming over. Don’t tell them what they’ve eaten until afterwards. They’re like, “Oh, my god. That was delicious.” It’s very common to have nowhere near enough B12. If you’re a vegetarian, you’re very likely to have not enough B12.

Dr. Pompa:
Yeah.

Dr. Wahls:
You might have enough folate, but you need both the B12 and the folate to do really well.

Dr. Pompa:
Creatine plays a big role in methylation, which people don’t realize.

Dr. Wahls:
As a vegetarian, I think it would be pretty tough to have enough creatine.

Dr. Pompa:
Yeah. Yeah, absolutely. What’s your feeling on – it’s kind of in vogue right now. I probably get questions every day on it. A few years ago, I was really excited about it, and I’ve become a little less excited about it. All the SNPs, what value do you think is in it, or not?

Dr. Wahls:
At the most –

Dr. Pompa:
I said, “Snips”, so I probably lost people. If I put the word M-T-H-F-R genotype, then maybe I pulled people back in. That’s called a genetic SNP, folks. Terry, answer – with that.

Dr. Wahls:
A SNP is single nucleotide polymorphism. It’s how we get variation. We’ve identified at least 10 million variations. It’s not so pricey. I could get my entire DNA sequence. I could take my report in to my doc and say, “What does this mean?” They’re like, “Oh, my god. I can’t deal with that.”

You could give your report to another company that does an analysis to say, “Based on your SNPs, we’re going to recommend – you have five variations that say you need to take methyl B12, curcumin, and Resveratrol. To go further down the report, it says that you have seven SNPs that you should not take any Resveratrol. You cannot metabolize curcumin, and you’re at risk of becoming B12-toxic.” The observation I make is this is far more complex that we realize. Our ancestors handled those SNPs pretty damn well.

Dr. Pompa:
That’s my opinion.

Dr. Wahls:
They were out eating food, moving around, being exposed to daylight, going to bed when it was dark, having sex with people that they liked, hopefully, and having social networks that were supportive. Our problem is not likely our SNPs. Our problem is far more likely our diet and lifestyle choices.

It’s true, I could have a very resistant, difficult disease. I’ve been doing all the right diet and lifestyle stuff. I could do a genetic analysis, get some SNPs, and it could tell me that I don’t have wild-type genes for how I handle B12. I have four SNPs, but it won’t tell me if those SNPs make my B12 enzymes more efficient or less efficient.

Dr. Pompa:
Absolutely. Absolutely.

Dr. Wahls:
I would have to do nutritional assays to figure out, “Do I have a B12 problem or not? Have I compensated adequately with my dietary change or not?” My feeling is for most of us, SNPs are not going to give [00:43:37]. A detailed nutritional metabolic activity certainly could. A detailed poop analysis, metabolic activity might. That’s really more of a research question yet. We’ll probably get it to a point where I could understand that. People with a lot of money and want to spend it on stuff, I’d rather they spend it on organic –

Dr. Pompa:
Yeah. I agree. It’s sort of coming out. I put a lot of time into it, looked at it, and started trying to find more clinical benefit. At the end of the day, I said, “It’s really not changing my clinical outcomes or my doctors’.” I think there’s some benefit to it. I think we can look at certain weaknesses, but you answered the question. You said, “Yeah, okay, great. You may have the M-T-H-F-R gene, but what other adaptations that we haven’t discovered yet are turned on to make you more sensitive, more absorbent of B12 and folic acid and utilizing it differently?”

We genetically run around other weak pathways, and we haven’t even figured it out yet, honestly, because that answers the question of why you can have the worst genetic types, and yet they have no problem with methylation or folate.

Dr. Wahls:
We already know that their ancestors had reproductive success.

Dr. Pompa:
Yep.

Dr. Wahls:
At some point, those SNPs worked well in our past, or worked well enough that you could have sex and have kids.

Dr. Pompa:
Absolutely. Just because you have this SNP that we think is bad, I promise you, there’s probably two others that go with that one that – why you’re here, and you’re successful.

Dr. Wahls:
Correct. I think it’s far more important to help people understand diet and lifestyle choices and how to do them more effectively. I have plenty of people who are still pre-contemplative. They can’t quite get their head around our approach, but we also have plenty of folks who are able to dive very deep in this remaking of their lives.

Dr. Pompa:
Yeah. One more, perhaps, controversial question. We’re both big into the microbiome. What’s your feeling on – and I don’t want to get anyone in trouble here. The FDA could be potentially listening – fecal transplant for [00:46:04] as far as bringing in – because I’ve seen miracles happen here.

Dr. Wahls:
So have I.

Dr. Pompa:
Of course, I’m [00:46:10], but I’ve seen miracles happen and have heard of the miracles.

Dr. Wahls:
Certainly, if we go in the US, the FDA has determined that the only thing that they’re not going to hassle people over is refractory c diff.

Dr. Pompa:
Correct.

Dr. Wahls:
If you’re doing [00:46:28] for another reason, you’re going to be in trouble with the FDA. We’ve certainly seen many people going over to the Taymount Clinic in London. They’ve now opened a branch in the Bahamas. They do a nice history, evaluate do you probably have a high risk of having diminished bacterial diversity? They’ll tell you that they can give you 10 fecal transplants over 10 days that will greatly enhance your diversity in your gut, likely reduce any gut symptoms.

Dr. Pompa:
Yeah.

Dr. Wahls:
We don’t know what effect it will have on your other chronic health issues.

Dr. Pompa:
Yeah.

Dr. Wahls:
It may have no effect, or it may have a [00:47:09] effect.

Dr. Pompa:
By the way, I’ve seen just that when [00:47:13] gotten them done.

Dr. Wahls:
Oh, yeah.

Dr. Pompa:
Dramatic – shuts down all their autoimmune, and I’ve seen –

Dr. Wahls:
Parkinson’s, MS, people who are in wheelchairs, who are walking again – so it is, for some people, very dramatic. Now, if they don’t radically change their diet –

Dr. Pompa:
They’re going to kill it.

Dr. Wahls:
They can’t keep their friends around, and they’ll lose their diversity and their autoimmunity.

Dr. Pompa:
Dr. Terry, I’ve found the same thing, too. People that are very toxic and keep moving toxins out of their body, they can just keep killing all of the new guys, the good bacteria that they keep putting in. It’s that three-legged stool. We have to fix the microbiome, the gut. We have to get rid of the stressors, and ultimately, that will change the genome.

Dr. Wahls:
Yeah.

Dr. Pompa:
Of course, I give nutrients here that focus on the genome and protecting the genome. That’s really where my 5Rs interplays. You know, Terry, time just flew by. I feel like –

Dr. Wahls:
Oh, goodness. That was lots of fun.

Dr. Pompa:
I know, right? I could just go on and on. It’s remarkable that you and I have never met like this, yet we agree so much. I’m going to fly out there one day and see what you have going on.

Dr. Wahls:
Every summer, we do a seminar for the public, three days, talking about the Wahls Protocol, teach them what’s the latest research, what we’re doing the research on. This year, we’re adding a health practitioner workshop day, and I’m adding a certification program.

Dr. Pompa:
Yeah. That’s great. You know, [00:48:49]

Dr. Wahls:
We’ve got to train more people to think the way we think.

Dr. Pompa:
Yeah. That’s been my passion now. I take some clients on virtually, not as many as I used to. My passion is really training more doctors to do what we’re doing, the things we’re talking about here.

Dr. Wahls:
Absolutely.

Dr. Pompa:
Everything that we’ve spoke about, people need coached. I always say, “You don’t need more treatments. You need to learn, folks listening, what Terry and I are talking about.” We’re both passionate about training up a new type of doctor that understands this.

Dr. Wahls:
A new generation of health professionals that will [00:49:24] us.

Dr. Pompa:
Absolutely. Thank you for your service. Thank you for coming on this show because I’m telling you, you’re changing lives. We reach a lot of people through this show. Give your website again so people –

Dr. Wahls:
Sure. TerryWahls, T-E-R-R-Y, Wahls, W-A-H-L-S dot com. I’m on Facebook, Terry Wahls, MD, and on Twitter, Terry Wahls. Come check out what we’re doing. Sign up for the newsletter. Come to our seminar. Learn a lot. Change the world.

Dr. Pompa:
Yeah. I’m behind everything that you’re doing there. Keep us abreast of more of the clinical studies and trials because we’ll put it to practice. We want to teach and do what’s working.

Dr. Wahls:
Sounds like a plan. Thank you very much.

Dr. Pompa:
Thank you. Thanks for, in your busy schedule, making it happen. Thank you, Terry.

Dr. Wahls:
You’re welcome. Bye-bye now.

Dr. Pompa:
All right. Bye-bye.

 

 

 

 

106: Mold Illness and Mold Remediation with Kevin Sutherland

Transcript of Episode 106: Mold Illness and Mold Remediation

With Dr. Daniel Pompa, Meredith Dykstra, Phil Kaplan, and special guest Kevin Sutherland.

Meredith:
Welcome to Cellular Healing TV. This is Episode number 106, and Dr. Pompa and I have some very special guests with us today. We have Phil Kaplan who is no stranger to Cellular Healing TV, and he's going to be joining the show to share his personal mold remediation story. To further explain the story, we have Kevin Sutherland on the call, who is Phil's mold remediation specialist, who actually worked with Phil to remediate the mold from his home. We have Dr. Pompa here, of course. Welcome, everyone, to the show.

Dr. Pompa:
Yeah, thank you.

Phil:
Thank you -inaudible-, Dr. Pompa. My story is not that important here. What's important is that I finally found a guy who did it right. That's what's important. You know my story, and we've spoken about it, but I've got very sick from mold. I have moved 16 times, which is hard for people to believe but living in south Florida, it's really hard to find a place that does not have mold. There were different people that I hired, once mold was identified, to fix the problem. They don't come in and charge me money. They don't come in and remove something, but they didn't seem to fix the problem. What's interesting is one of those guys actually wrote the book on how to do mold remediation right. It wasn't until I moved into a new home, found some water, called Kevin, that I realized Kevin is doing it by the book. The guy who wrote the book didn't do it that way, but Kevin did.

What I want to tell you is so many people can prevent themselves from getting sick from mold if they know what to do when it's identified. That's the big if because most people don't know what to do, and there are lots of contractors out there, lots of people out there, business owners, who will take advantage, knowingly or unknowingly, of the opportunity to make money from mold. It doesn't mean they do the job right. I thought it would be good for you guys to meet, so Kevin can help coach people as to how to make the right moves once you find water, or mold, or suspect there's mold.

Dr. Pompa:
By the way, Phil, this is one of the number one problems we have. Many people have watched the show that I've done with you, and some other mold shows, and we know that mold, heavy metals, and hidden infections, are these upstream sources that make people very sick. We also know that you don't get better until you identify them, and mold is one of those things. It's the toughest thing to find. People suspect it, we can't find it, and then once they do, the remediation goes wrong, or people come back in the house after spending major money, and they're more sick because they're that sensitive. Phil, that's how you ended up in how many homes?

Phil:
Sixteen.

Dr. Pompa:
Sixteen homes, so because you're pressed for time, Phil, so you're going to be with us here just for a short period of time. I want to turn it over to you to walk them through, our audience, our viewing audience, of what it really takes to remediate a home correctly. The things that they need to look for, to do, and you can do that even with your own story. I'm going to turn you over to Kevin.

Phil:
Let me start by telling how they did it wrong because you don't know until you see somebody doing it right. One example was there was mold underneath the kitchen sink underneath the cabinet. Of course, they came in, and they said, “We're going to charge you X number of dollars,” and X was a large number. “We're going to remove all of this, and then we're going to rebuild the cabinet.” They did. They came in, took some sledge hammers, and destroyed, and carried stuff out, and what they were doing was sending everything that was inside that cabinet into the air.

Sure enough, they took away the identifiable mold, but there's this very insidious thing called a mold spore that moves around the house and contaminates the air. Even thought the visible mold was removed, the problem from there got worse and months later, it was literally growing like fur out of the vents. When they come in, and they go, “We've taken care of the problem,” you want to believe them. I started getting sick, and I started to think it's in my head. They took out the mold. How could I be getting sick, again? Now, I understand why.

When I moved into this home, I had it inspected, and there was no mold. They did an air test, and they did some other type of test, an ERMI test it's called, where they take a dust sample. They said there was no mold. The week I moved in, I was standing in a doorway, an interior doorway, and I felt water dripping on me, and I looked up. That's when I said, “You know what?” I need help, but I'm not going to call the guy who I've called before because clearly he didn't help.” I went to Angie's List. That's how I found you. I went to Angie's List, and Kevin came up first, and I called him, and I started asking him questions. He sounded like he answered everything correctly, and he came out, and I'll let you take it from there.

Kevin:
I came here and first they pointed out the area where there was water dripping on his shoulder. The first thing to do is identify where the moisture source is coming from. In his case, it was a direct moisture source that's coming from the upstairs level. That's not the case in all scenarios. Sometimes, it is humidity, humidity caused by lack of air conditioning, lack of insulation, temperature differences between the inside of the wall cavities to the interior of the home. There's a few different reasons.

Phil:
This was actually a leak coming from the upstairs toilet through the ceiling.

Dr. Pompa:
I'm glad Kevin pointed out though that it doesn't need to be a leak because I see that, Kevin, what you said a lot is that they don't put enough insulation, or it's not insulated. It's just like when you have a glass of water, there's a temperature difference—if it's hot outside and that moisture forms on the outside, where did it come from? It came from the moisture in the air. That's what happens behind walls. I see that a lot, Kevin.

Kevin:
Yeah, that happens a lot. Actually, another incident that I run into often with the temperature difference and condensation arising is they say they use their air conditioner. I look at how the air conditioner is set right, supposedly it's where it's always the setting that they showed me. It's not changed just before I come and enter the property, but the windows, if they have single paned windows, and they sweat a lot in the morning, all that humidity eventually evaporates into the interior air, and that adds humidity. If it's not vented or exhausted right, then their humidity level will continue to rise.

Dr. Pompa:
Kevin, I don't want to interrupt you because you're making a point, but I just recently had a patient who the mold, they found it. It was around all their windows from the sweaty window problem. It was running down, in, and around it. Again, they had three mold people come in, and do three different tests, and all said, “Oh, it's fine,” because they just did air tests. Finally, someone looked, and they found it.

Kevin:
Eventually, it can build up where it's coming off of that window sill and then soaking, absorbing into the drywall, where it's going to retain much longer. It is an issue. Nowadays, they do make the windows double paned, but I would recommend if you do see them sweating in the morning, those mornings during the winter where you keep it warm inside and the cold outside, use a towel, use a rag, but wipe it and soak up some of that moisture, so it doesn't go into your air.

Phil:
Here's an important point. I had the house mold tested, ERMI test and air test, and it came back clean. When Kevin came in, and identified the leak, and saw where it was coming from, the water was running in a channel. It was a specific path, which was good because it didn't go everywhere. When he pulled away some of the wall, there was visible mold. A question I have is how does the house test clean if when you open up the wall there's mold there?

Kevin:
The air test that they take—there's a few different types of spore traps, but spore traps go for a certain range of square footage around where the actual sample is taken. That is also hampered by the blueprints of where there's a wall. To be certain and thorough, I don't know exactly where they took them when you had the guy take the samples in the property, but you want one in each room because that's going to give you the most effective means of knowing whether or not you have an air quality problem because the walls and everything can isolates some air in the area and not in the other. It'll mix and flow, but it'll come in at a lower number. If they didn't take it around that general area, it might not pop up.

Phil:
This is an important point is just because the mold test comes back clean, doesn't mean you don't have mold. Dr. Pompa, when you deal with sick people, and they develop, first, respiratory symptoms, then neurological symptoms, and it sounds like mold, if they went and bought a little mold kit at Home Depot, that mold kit may not really identify the problem. Now, in my case, I was very upset when I felt water dripping down my shoulder. In hindsight, I was really glad because it identified the problem, and then we were able to fix it. Mold tests is Step one, and I would say if you're experiencing symptoms, or if you smell mildew, or something musty, you've got to dig a little deeper.

Kevin:
Sure, if you have an odor, a lot of times it is mold. It's usually either a fungi, a bacteria, or a -inaudible-. The mold testing, bouncing back to that real quick, it can help identify—the ones that they sell in the stores with the Petri dishes are more or less going to tell you what's in that environment, whether it's naturally there or not. It really won't tell you if you have an elevated mold problem because it's not a comparative sample as the air samples are comparative. We have -inaudible- that's the environment of the property. The smell you should definitely have it checked out because all of them are a problem. If it's bacteria, bacteria have odors, the fungi do, and the -inaudible-, which the formaldehyde is now in the media pretty big. Those have odors and usually the first thing people assume is the mold, which more of the probability more of the time is that it is mold, but the -inaudible- is common, as well.

Dr. Pompa:
Exactly, and one of the things I want to point out is that we get someone like Phil, Kevin, they become sensitive to the biotoxin that mold produces. Therefore, he's not reacting to the mold spore like someone with an allergy. This is Biotoxic Illness. He's reacting to minute amounts of a biotoxin. That's really the importance of containing this. You're going to get to how to remediate, the proper containment. Once those biotoxins start moving in the home, he's reacting to that and not the spore. Most tests are looking at the spore.

Now, we have a new test that I just sent Phil, and we're going to do a future show on this. We're actually looking at the mycotoxin or the biotoxin in the person. It's a newer test and like I said we're going to do a show on it and bring one of the gentlemen in. That's the problem, Kevin, is that we're looking at minute amounts of a biotoxin making someone who's hyper sensitive in the home. Testing can only get you so far. Phil, what do we always say? The best test is the canary in the coal mine, meaning that if you feel better away from your house, you've got a problem, and you better bring in an expert like Kevin. If you get back in your house, and you feel worse, again, you better bring an expert in like Kevin because you've got a problem.

Kevin, I just wanted to state that there's no perfect test. The ERMI test, I think, is one of the best ones. Phil, the one that you did, where we're able to look at what's going on inside the house, and then we're able to look at normal mold spores what you're saying. In other words, there's mold, there's spores in the home, but what is normal and abnormal? That's what these tests show.

Phil:
Sure, and then we found, as Kevin continued to inspect by the front door,—Dr. Pompa, did you just get offended? He just ran away.

Dr. Pompa:
No, my dog just goes crazy -inaudible-. This little dog is such a nuisance for -inaudible-. I'm telling you. This is like the devil of self TV, right here.

Phil:
Mascot.

Dr. Pompa:
The mascot.

Phil:
He found by the door a little of the baseboard was peeling away. He stripped that away and found some water intrusion there, too, which again I was thankful for. The big question I have is can you fix it? Can you remediate it? He said, “Yes.” We set a date. I think it might have been the next day, and I think I might have been out of town. I gave you the key, so when I came back home, it was noisy in here.

Kevin:
Yeah, the machines they make do make some decibel levels, windy and decibel levels.

Phil:
The first thing you did is you—talk about what you did.

Kevin:
The first thing is to build a containment. First of all, as you were saying, contractors go in—for the viewers watching, they need to make sure it's a licensed remediator. Go ahead and check that. You can look up the licensing online on the Florida business website. A lot of -inaudible-, the maintenance companies come in, and they have their own maintenance men do it themselves, but they don't know what they're doing. Then, you run into future problems. It starts to -inaudible- air quality.

Dr. Pompa:
-inaudible- because most of our viewers are not in Florida, necessarily.

Kevin:
Regardless, they should check if their state has licensing, and verify that they know what they're doing. Then steps of it is also containment. The containment is the first step, building a containment, but that's only one part of it. That containment has to be pressurized. You want to make sure that the air is coming inwards, and being filtered, but not going outwards. There are times when there are quick breaches of that containment when you go in and out and if it's pressurized negatively, then any air is coming inward. You can verify that by the way the bow of the plastic material that builds the containment bows, and it should be pressing inward. You build a containment, you pressurize it, and then you don't really go in there busting—

Dr. Pompa:
Just describe, for people that don't know, the containment. What does that mean?

Kevin:
The containment is structuring walls. Usually, it's a framing through poles or furring strips, which are small wood strips. Then, it's just simply plastic wrapped around. It's all the way to the ceiling. It's tight. It's to the floor.

Dr. Pompa:
-inaudible- sealed, right? It's sealed, and then we create a negative air. Like you said, the plastic will suck in showing that the air is going out of the house, not in the house.

Phil:
It's got these massive air movers that, as I said, they're very noisy, but they're doing the job. I don't know if you remember in the movie ET, where at the end when they captured ET. They had him in this thing. That's what it reminded me of. That's what you built in the house.

Kevin:
That's exactly what it is. You need a containment, you need it pressurized, and you have to have air scrubbers running. As soon as you start to remove the drywall, baseboard, cabinets, whatever it is, building materials, that's been -inaudible- water damage. As soon as you start removing it, it's like pollen on a flower. You hit that little flower, all the pollen goes up in the air. That flower wants to make sure it can have the highest probability to reproduce. The mold is the same way. The fungi lets all the spores in the air as soon as you start to disturb it.

Your air quality actually goes from bad to worse before it gets better. You had to have a HEPA. We call them air scrubbers. It's an industrial sized HEPA filter that filters out the spores. That's got to be running when the building materials are removed, but you can't go in there, and take a sledge hammer, and start knocking it all down. You want to disturb it as least as possible. You want to make precision cuts, feel out where your studs are, and your furring strips, and be able to pop it out with as least disturbance as possible to that fungi. It all plays a part in having a clean product at the end.

Dr. Pompa:
Here's another mistake after that, great. How do we kill the mold? How do we get rid of it? I see people make this mistake, and by the way, those watching, if you think perhaps you're sick from mold, then obviously we want to detect that first. Once they are sick from mold, they become chemically sensitive. Now, we're killing with chemicals, and then that becomes a new problem.

Kevin:
Right, the chemical that you—the dog, again.

Dr. Pompa:
-inaudible-.

Kevin:
The chemical that you use is very important. A big mistake—

Phil:
Actually, Dr. Pompa, we should—tell me it has a bladder problem, so you very quickly -inaudible-.

Kevin:
The chemical that you use is very important. You need to use an antimicrobial. A lot of homeowners, I guess they hear it around, but they use bleach. They use a bleach-water solution, and then what happens is the mycotoxins inside the spore mix with the chemicals inside the Clorox, the bleach, the chlorine. Then, you have different mycotoxins that are produced. Use an antimicrobial is the way to go. Don't use anything but that for cleaning. First, remove everything that you can but which you cannot, make sure it's bio washed, which is a HEPA vacuum first, and then the antimicrobial, but don't use a bleach-water solution at all.

Dr. Pompa:
Yeah, okay. Those are classic mistakes that most people make. Now, Phil, I have to ask you. He remediated this. You got rid of the mold. Now, Kevin, I have to ask this question though. Let's say we see visible black mold or whatever type of mold it is. Do you just kill it, or do you actually remove the mold and then kill it with the antimicrobial?

Kevin:
Okay, if it's on the interior of the wall—the majority of the time it's more within the cavity but a lot of times you do see it on the interior where you have direct access to it. That area is presumed if it’s not surface mold, if it’s not from humidity, and it’s thick, and multiple types, it’s more than likely into the drywall, and it’s going to be in the cavity sides, also. The mold that you do see, you can do—we call it self containment—directly on top of that to prevent that disturbance that I talked about when we remove the thing. We can take a sheet of plastic, spray an adhesive around it, then put it right over it like a Band-Aid. Now, when we open that up, we’re going to disturb the mold inside the cavity some, and remember, we’re inside the containment that’s pressurized for that, but it’s still keeping down the spore level that could have been released that is on our side, and we have access, too, before we get into the cavity.

Dr. Pompa:
Yeah. Yeah. That’s what I was getting at. Another mistake that I see often is, great, they do all this, even if they do it right, but then they don’t address the moisture problem.

Kevin:
Oh, yeah.

Dr. Pompa:
Phil’s was simple. There was a leak. You traced it back; you fixed the leak. If it’s a basement, for example, that has positive water pressure, where different storms come in, what are you doing to reroute the water from putting that pressure on the foundation or the humidity problems that you and I spoke about? Do you address that on every site? A lot of guys don’t address that. I get very upset about that.

Kevin:
Oh, no. We do. Majority of the time—and I believe we did it here for the window incident. We had it open. We didn’t go ahead with the rebuild right away. We left the containment up. We flooded the outside with the hose, found that it was coming in in a little corner of the window. It could have been soaked up from the bottom of the slab at grade level. It could have been coming in through the window, which it was. There’s a few different options. There’s a hose bib out there. If the line ran through there, it could have been from that. This one was a corner of the window when we flooded it, and we were able to use a thermal camera on the inside to see exactly where that leak was coming in through, and seal the leak, and then retest it.

Dr. Pompa:
I was going to ask you if you did that. Yeah.

Kevin:
We want to test it, find the leak before we seal everything, and then test to see if it’s not leaking. Always test to find the leak. That way, you know where you look for it after you do the sealing. If you just go ahead and seal everywhere before you even flood the wall with the hose, then you’re never going to know if you certainly got the water leak.

Dr. Pompa:
We got success with the thermal cameras, going around the basement drywall, and then—because if you find the moisture, guess what? You’ve found the mold. Am I right on that?

Kevin:
-inaudible- the moisture.

Dr. Pompa:
Yeah. Those things can help find the moist areas, which is really important.

Kevin:
Just real quick, with that, they do find the moist areas, but what it’s really detecting is temperature change.

Dr. Pompa:
Correct. Exactly.

Kevin:
The water areas are cooler than the surroundings, so it’s able to find that, but it is used for the water detection.

Phil:
When somebody’s living in a home, and they detect mold, of course they want to get rid of it quickly. I think that makes people very vulnerable because people can come in and do very quick work. What Kevin is describing, it sounds like a lot of meticulous investigation and follow-up, and it is. It’s a lot of work, but it’s the right way to do it. Any other way is going to cause a future problem, almost guaranteed. It is a lot of work.

That’s why I’m saying if somebody comes to you with a better price and says they can do it in less time, that’s not a reason to make that connection. You got to make sure that you find somebody that’s going to really take care of the problem. Here in South Florida, -inaudible-, would you acknowledge there are lots of people who just don’t do it the right way?

Kevin:
Oh, absolutely. Everybody’s trying to save a dime. They get the lowballer in there, who could just get the job done real quick and move on, but he’s already paid and gone before you realize you’ve even got more problems now.

Phil:
We, on our recent episode of Health Seekers Radio, our radio show, we spoke about this, and I pulled up an article that was written by somebody very credible from a university, who said mold is not a problem. There are lots of remediators out there who will agree with that. They go, “Oh, that’s just not a big deal. We just have to get it out. It’s the black mold that’s bad. Anything else is okay. We just have to clean it up.”

After Kevin finished the job, I was upstairs in the bedroom, and I noticed a little bit of moisture right around the vent. I called him, and he came out the next day and sealed that up, too. It reminds me of when you came out to my old house that became problematic, you walked in, and you said, “Attic air.” Right? As soon as you walked in, you said, “Attic air.” When you have those little spaces—I’ll let you answer it—that’s a red flag, and thankfully, he took care of it right away. It wasn’t a problem, but had it been left there, it might have become one, right?

Kevin:
Oh, yeah. Oh, yeah. What we did is we put a weather strip on the scuttle hole. For you that don’t know what a scuttle hole is, it’s the board that you move over to the side so you can access the attic. Throughout the day, as the pressures change between positive and negative on the inside and outside pressures, pressure comes in through the scuttle holes and pressurizes the attic. That will push down and go in -inaudible- hole if there’s -inaudible-. We used a weather strip to seal that, and also around the frame, we put some extra caulking just to make sure that there’s not a little gap that the air could escape through.

Phil:
I’ll mention this, too. He went out of his way to find non-VOC caulking, right?

Kevin:
Yes.

Phil:
He understood that there’s a lot more here than just the mold sensitivity. This is why it’s important. This is why I felt it important to bring Kevin on. I think a lot of people who suffer with mold issues for a very long time suffer longer than they have to because they don’t find the right solution to fix either their house, or office, or wherever it was problematic.

Dr. Pompa:
Absolutely. Yup. Phil, you know, you said it, too, is that if you have a mold issue and you became sick by mold or heavy metals, you end up with chemical sensitivity. Kevin, that’s the other battle. Great, we fixed their mold problem, but now these people are very sensitive to VOCs, volatile organic compounds, and chemicals in perfumes, fragrances, new carpets, caulking, paint. They come in with this remediation, and they put new paint, new caulking, all of these chemicals, and they’re more sick. Now we don’t know, is it the chemicals, or is it because the contamination—the containment wasn’t done right or something?

This is a big deal. Phil, I know you have somewhere to go, and if you have to jump off like I had to jump off to close the door for my dog, feel free. I have to say HVACs, Phil, that’s one of the things that kept you from finding a good home. Sixteen homes, I don’t know how many were moldy HVACs, but Kevin, I put that on you. We talked about this in one of the past shows, too. Especially in humid areas, the coil of the HVAC, and mold builds up in the HVAC like you said. They run the lines in attics, and if that air is escaping, you can get moisture just from the holes—the non-sealed vents, right, and the coils.

Kevin:
Yeah.

Dr. Pompa:
Talk about some of the HVACs because I know people watching this, that could be their problem.

Phil:
I’m going to let you do that. I can’t wait to hear your answer when I watch the recording. I got to go pick my daughter up at school.

Dr. Pompa:
You’re scared -inaudible-.

Phil:
I’m very glad I was able to connect you guys, so keep it going.

Dr. Pompa:
Thanks. Thanks, Phil.

Phil:
You can move to center.

Kevin:
All right. Thanks, Phil. With the HVACs—in the attics, they all have humidity issues just for the lack of the HVAC, but the plumbing is up there, and then you get the warm air next to the cold air, and you get the condensation again. The drain line happens a lot. The cold lines, as well as the duct work, too.

Dr. Pompa:
The drain line, especially when those darn things are in the attic—

Kevin:
Yeah.

Dr. Pompa:
Yeah.

Kevin:
They will back up a lot, too. One of the biggest problems we have is that drain line backing up, algae building up on the inside. Then the coils are draining where they should be, but then the pan just overflows because it can’t escape all the water. Some mold does come up in the attic, and then when the pressure changes, it’ll push in the house if it has a access.

We talked about the scuttle door last time, but it does also happen just around the AC vents. If you were to pull off the register where the AC blows through—we can’t exactly see it, but we’re sure there’s one there. If you were to pull off that register, the two screws, there is a box inside. They call that the can.

Dr. Pompa:
Right.

Kevin:
This is another place a lot of people are complaining about finding mold, and I get a lot of calls. That can, they need to cut in the drywall to have that line up exactly. A lot of times, it’s cut a little big, which it’s very hard to get it exactly right, but then you have the warm air escaping right were the cold air’s coming out, also. On top, it’s blowing on the metal. They’re either usually plastic or metal registers.

It’s blowing on the metal, cold on one side, warm on the other, very common place for the condensation, once again, the culprit. It’s going to grow mold. It’s absorbed into the drywall, and also the dust that accumulates on that vent over time has organic material to feed the mold. The mold needs water, which is either condensation or the direct water source, the leak, and they need something organic.

When it’s on the metal, usually it’s actually either the paint that it’s on if it’s painted metal as the organic material or it’s dust and buildup that it’s feeding on, even though it looks like it’s feeding on the metal. Definitely the drywall has the organic material, and all baseboards and everything do, as well.

Also, on the HVAC—and we need to do is if there’s mold in the house, we remediate that area, but before that area is remediated, we need to assume that some of those—that area has a concentration of spores, but we need to assume the spores also flew off elsewhere throughout the house. They need to be addressed, and we place some different air scrubbers around to grab those. What about the ones in the ductwork?

Dr. Pompa:
That’s right.

Kevin:
Yeah. That’s an issue. That’s a highway throughout the house. We do an antimicrobial fog that we shoot up through the coils and wait until it blows out the registers. The whole house is empty. There’s no pets, no humans in there. Four hours is our time for the antimicrobial fog.

A lot of people and companies are—what they’re stopping now is they’re cleaning with brushes. -inaudible- brush goes up in there, and that practice is starting to stop. A lot of the big franchises are stopping that. There’s lawsuits. People should be aware of it because the brushes are going up there. When they get to the first turn, they’re tearing the line. A lot of this ductwork is old. They’re tearing the lining of the ductwork. Then they’re in a whole new world of problems because it’s sucking in—when it turns on, it’s going to create a flow—a draw from inside that attic, so you get that moldy air as well as the fiberglass. Now you have little pieces of fiberglass you’re breathing in, which is another bad problem. Once again, the guy is already paid and down the road.

Dr. Pompa:
Yeah. Yeah, no. We see these pitfalls all the time, especially in humid areas like Florida. Most places on the East Coast, the HVAC’s the culprit. Here’s another tip that one of our experts on past shows gave: Keep your fan running all the time instead of auto, where it turns off, turns on, turns off. You’re running all the time. There’s less chance of mold building up on the coil because there’s air blowing across it all the time.

Kevin:
Right.

Dr. Pompa:
Yeah. No. These are great tips. What I want my viewers to understand is if you have weird symptoms, maybe even just the inability to lose weight all of a sudden, or you gain weight all of a sudden, those are oftentimes mold exposures. You’re more sensitive to light, joint pain, morning stiffness, just anxiety, can’t sleep, lack of energy, obviously, but just weird and unexplainable symptoms. Mold is one of the typical culprits.

We’re not talking about a mold allergy here. We’re talking about a biotoxic illness. This is one of the things that I saw are the Big Guys, the Three Amigos that make people really sick. Mold, metals, and hidden infections, Kevin, we look for these things in people’s lives because they’re so toxic that they shut down the detox pathways in the body that naturally gets rid of all the toxins we’re exposed to every day, day in, day out. Once these big toxins like mold, or the biotoxin from mold, starts affecting us, now it shuts down our detox pathways. Now we see the unexplainable illnesses. Now we see the sleep problems. Now we see the anxiety.

Most people, Kevin, they’re either chasing it with medications, one medication after another medication. If they go in the alternative world, they start thinking, “Well, it’s my adrenals.” Yes, you’re darn right your adrenals are exhausted. Your thyroid gets wiped out, and you start losing your hair with mold oftentimes. It triggers autoimmune conditions. Again, they’re too far downstream, either taking medication or supplements for their thyroid or their adrenals, or God forbid, they get put on autoimmune anti drugs.

The point is this: Mold, just like heavy metals, is often the upstream cause of why we have all these symptoms, why the thyroid’s not working, why the adrenals aren’t working, why you’re fatigued, why you can’t lose weight, why you still have headaches, and joint pain, and morning stiffness. You’ve got to go upstream and get rid of the source that’s causing it.

Kevin:
Sure.

Dr. Pompa:
If it’s your house, you’ve got to fix it correctly. That’s the point we’re making here today. If it’s any type of exposure, you’ve got to get rid of the exposure. Then, Kevin, we have to get rid of it in the body correctly, which is a whole other topic, right, Meredith? We talk about true cellular detox. Most of the detox—hey, Kevin. As you’re talking about how people screw up the detox of the house, if you will, fixing the house, it’s worse on our end.

When it goes to detoxing the body, people doing this 10-day cleanse, this cleanse, that cleanse, it’s just like what you’re talking about. It’s making things worse, not making things better. The home has to be remediated; the body has to be remediated. Meredith, do you have any questions because you always have good ones.

Meredith:
Yeah. Hi, Kevin. I’m wondering, too, sometimes if we talk so much about mold, but I’m wondering about types of mold and what we need to watch out for. I know that black mold is obviously a big problem, but can you speak to other types of mold? We eat mold on our foods, and that seems to be okay, so can you kind of explain that a little bit more?

Kevin:
What it comes down to is the types of mold that they label there, the genuses. Inside that genus, there’s about 70,000 different types of genuses. Inside the genus, there’s the species. A lot of times, we’ll say the names, the Stachybotrys, the Penicillin, the Aspergillus, the Cladiosporium. They’re thinking that’s the species, but that’s the genus, which is the larger class. Inside the genus is the species.
Then for each one—so there’s 70,000 different genuses throughout the world.

Dr. Pompa:
Yeah.

Kevin:
You can’t name them all, of course. They have the species that some might have different toxins. Some might just have allergens. The one that’s really bad down here in my area of South Florida is the Stachybotrys. That’s the one the media labels as black mold, but there is actually many types of black mold.

Dr. Pompa:
Right.

Kevin:
Regardless, any type in concentration is not good. If your normal environment out there, you have 100 parts per cubic meter, which is pretty high for any type, and then inside, I see it at 30,000 types. They didn’t even know until you pull the test. They might not have the odor, but their body’s absorbing this in concentration.

It doesn’t really matter whether that one has a lot of toxicities or a lot of allergens, it’s just the impact of the quantity. It’s both the impact of the quantity plus the toxins together. It’s just not good to have an abnormal situation, especially if you’re in that house there, eight hours a day, sleeping in it, cooking in it, watching TV in it. Your body’s just assuming way too much of it. As we all know, too much of anything is not a good thing.

Dr. Pompa:
Yeah. We often hear that, right Meredith? “Oh, there’s mold everywhere.” You’re right. There is mold everywhere, but certain mold—not every mold is created equal. A mold like Clostridium, Stachybotrys, Aspergillus, these molds frequently make people sick. You’re right. We call it amplified mold. Once it starts building up in a contained area like a home, this is where the trouble starts.

Kevin, I’m often asked this: “Look, I’m in the same home as my wife, or this person, or my husband. Why am I not sick?” First of all, I always say, “Give it time.” Everyone has genetically different detox pathways of getting rid of it. Some people are more genetically susceptible to these biotoxins -inaudible- than others.

Kevin:
Sure.

Dr. Pompa:
Yeah. There’s all these factors. Here’s the biggest one, really: It’s how many other toxic exposures do you actually have in your life, meaning that the person sitting there with amalgam fillings giving off mercury into their brain, their bucket’s already filled up to here. When they get exposed to mold, boom. They’re sick very quickly, as opposed to the other person who has gotten rid of a lot of their toxins, didn’t bioaccumulate them. Their bucket’s not as full. Maybe they genetically have a bigger bucket, or maybe their bucket wasn’t as full.

Either way, they won’t—it’ll take longer for them to react. Different genetic-sized buckets, how full is your bucket? Both of those will determine how fast you get sick from mold. Mold is bad for everybody, toxic mold. Heavy metals, mercury, it’s bad for everybody. Again, the size of the bucket, genetically, and how filled is basically how reactive you become.

Once that bucket starts overflowing, now we see all the unexplainable symptoms. Typically, people end up on medication for those symptoms, and typically, once they realize it’s a toxic issue, then they detox incorrectly. These are the issues, Kevin, I deal with every day.

Kevin:
You got a lot on your plate.

Dr. Pompa:
They come to me after they’ve been to every doctor, and typically, they’re detoxed wrong, or they’ve been treated downstream with supplements as well as medications. You have to get upstream, and you have to do it correctly. That’s -inaudible-.

Kevin:
Absolutely.

Dr. Pompa:
I appreciate you coming on. It’s an important show.

Kevin:
It’s a pleasure.

Dr. Pompa:
I hope we get—really got people to understand how important it is to remediate correctly. Stop the leaks, stop the sources, and get rid of the mold correctly, as well—so some major pitfalls.

Kevin:
Yeah, it is. If you don’t do a proper remediation, it’s not even worth doing it at all. You’re not moving any steps forward. Make sure you have somebody who gets it done right. My name’s Kevin Sutherland. I’m the owner of Accelerated Remediation. We work in Palm Beach and Broward County in Florida. You could see our website at www.MoldAR.com. Read our reviews on the Better Business Bureau and Angie’s List. You could always call if you have any questions or concerns. I’d be happy to hear them and try to help out.

Dr. Pompa:
I appreciate that. I do. I appreciate our viewers. I’m telling you, this was a very requested show because people, they really want to know more about this remediation. We get emails all the time. Thanks for the wisdom. Thanks for giving your website. Thanks for being on. I appreciate that.

Kevin:
-inaudible-.

Dr. Pompa:
Thank you. Thanks, Meredith.

Meredith:
Thanks, Kevin. Thanks, Dr. Pompa.

Kevin:
Goodbye, everybody.

Meredith:
See you guys next week. Have a great weekend.

105: Ketogenic Diet and Athletes with Guest Ben Greenfield

Transcript of Episode 105: Ketogenic Diet and Athletes with Guest Ben Greenfield

With Dr. Daniel Pompa, Meredith Dykstra, and special guest Ben Greenfield.

Meredith:
This is Episode 105, and today we have a very special guest joining Dr. Pompa and I. It is Ben Greenfield. Before I introduce Ben, I'm just going to read his bio, so you guys can learn a little bit more about Ben. Ben Greenfield is an ex-bodybuilder, Ironman triathlete, Spartan racer, coach, speaker, and author of the New York Times best seller, Beyond Training: Mastering Endurance, Health, and Life. In 2008, Ben was voted as NSCA's personal trainer of the year, and in 2013 and 2014, he was named greatest as one of the top 100 most influential people in health and fitness. Ben blogs and podcasts at bengreenfieldfitness.com and resides in Spokane, Washington with his wife and twin boys. Welcome, Ben to the show.

Ben:
Up.

Meredith:
Up, what do you mean by up? I can hear you, shoot. Alright, just muted there. We have Dr. Pompa here. How are you, Dr. Pompa?

Dr. Pompa:
Yeah, he said he might have to switch from his fancy mic to his other mic. We'll give him a minute to do that, and he'll realize that in a second. It's funny because he's walking on the treadmill, which is a much better thing than sitting in the chair all day. I know a couple friends that do that, as well.

Meredith:
Yeah, just out literally walking the talk.

Dr. Pompa:
While he gets his sound up from his computer – it was working right before the show. Isn't that ironic how that happens? Anyways, I remember years ago, Meredith, and I'll set this show up this way. Ben, I'm sure you can hear me, but I don't know when Ben first did these tests on himself. It was proving that fat-adapted athletes exist, meaning that the old days of all the high carbs with athletes, I believed, were gone. Yet, they were still saying we didn't have a lot of proof. Ben in his own study, at one of the universities, and he can tell us which one, actually did a study on himself.

Ben literally got on a treadmill for three hours, did all this blood work, and biopsies, and urine samples, stool samples, everything before the study, got on the treadmill for three hours, reread all the blood work, and the urine, and the stool, and everything. We'll have him talk about those results, but that inspired me. When I read it, I said, “I'm fat adapted because I've been in ketosis.” I said, “I'm going to fast overnight,” like I usually do, intermittent fast, and it was around 18 hours, and I went on a three hour fast bike ride, fasting 18 hours, so 18, 19, 20, 21. By the time I got home, 22 or 23 hours before, I'd eaten one bite of food, didn't bonk everyone on the ride, which are great athletes, we're eating, and I was the only one not eating and to their surprise, I never bonked. I had plenty of energy with over 20 hours without food. Ben proved that in a laboratory. Wonder if we can hear him now? He can talk about some of these results as proving fat-adapted athletes do exist. Ben, can you hear me?

Meredith:
Oh, shoot. Can't hear you. Oh, shoot. Alright, he's going to switch around some microphones, alright. Anyway, as he does that, guys, if you haven't guessed today, we're going to talk about low-carb fueling for athletes. That's the topic, and Dr. Pompa, do you want to share a little bit more while – Ben looks like he had to log-out. Maybe he's logging back in, while he gets his audio straight there maybe?

Ben:
Can you hear me?

Dr. Pompa:
Yeah.

Meredith:
Yes, we can hear you now, alright.

Dr. Pompa:
Ben, I don't know if you heard what I had said.

Ben:
I heard everything.

Dr. Pompa:
Okay, great. Your comments on that, and I know that even when you wrote that article, that I had originally read, all the data still wasn't even in. Talk about what inspired you to do that study on yourself, and then talk about what occurred during the study, what you measured, and of course how that affected life afterward.

Ben:
Sure. First of all, for anybody who likes to dawn their propeller hat and dive in, that study is available as a full PDF if you really want to dig into the methodology and the excellent discussion that is in that particular study. The FASTER Study is what it was called. My personal reasons for doing it were frankly pretty selfish. I'm racing Ironman triathlon and if I wanted to go faster or at least be able to maintain this speed that I was used to going at for longer periods of time, I wanted to do so without experiencing a lot of the potentially deleterious effects that chronically elevated blood sugar can cause or the potentially unsettling effects that carbohydrates fermenting in your gut can cause. Because of that and also because of the fact that in my genetic testing I've been shown to have about a 17% higher than normal risk for Type 2 diabetes, I needed to figure out a way to actually hack Ironman triathlon so to speak without going the traditional route of fueling with gels, and bars, and energy drinks, and things of that nature.

Over the course of the year that I was preparing for that study, meaning following a special diet of about 80 to 90% fat, 5 to 10% carbohydrate. Protein would vary a little bit depending on the day's activities. On a day that involved a lot of muscle tearing type of activity, particularly weight training or running, I would get protein up to close around 20%. The rest of the time, protein wasn't that high either. Protein was around 10 to 20%, so really a great deal of my dietary intake came from fat. I was not allowed near any Italian restaurants. Anyways though, so I raced twice, in terms of Ironman races, during the course of that year. I raced Ironman Canada, and I raced Ironman Hawaii, and it was really interesting to experience long, stable sources of energy even in the absence of the high amount of exogenous carbohydrate intake.

We're not talking about a complete absence of carbohydrates because frankly the nature of the beast is something like saying Ironman triathlon is you're out there for nine hours or ten hours, but there's a lot of what is called burning the match during that period of time. What that means is that when you pass someone during the race and the bike ride, you might be going from your normal race pace of 250 watts up to 400 watts, so that actually does cause a pretty significant glycolytic shift, a response of your body needing to burn through a high amount of carbohydrates.

It's not like you're going for a long-endurance event if you're doing ketosis with zero carbohydrates, but it's a much slower – about a quarter of the amount of carbohydrates I would normally consume during the actual event along with ample amounts of easy to digest proteins, particularly amino acids, and then also easy to digest fats, particularly medium chain triglycerides. Since that time, I've added in a third energy component and that would be ketones, literally the exogenous ketones in a powder form that you can take to jack up your ketone levels.

Dr. Pompa:
Yeah, we interviewed Dr. D'Agostino, and he talked a lot about exogenous ketones.

Ben:
Yeah, and what did you just say?

Dr. Pompa:
Yeah, I'm sorry. There's an echo there. We interviewed Dominic D'Agostino about more of the exogenous ketones, and we've added those to our fat regime.

Ben:
Yeah, I wish I'd known about those when I was racing Ironman. I've been using them since but during the time that I was preparing for this particular study that we're talking about, that wasn't something that was really readily available. Anyways though, that particular year of racing culminated in the study that you were referencing, where we went in, and we did a lot of tests. Some of the more notable test that we did was a microbiome to see how the gut differs between someone who follows a high-carbohydrate diet and someone who follows a high-fat diet.

We did fat biopsies to see if the actual fat tissue make-up was any different. We did muscle biopsies before and after exercise to see if there was any difference in the ability of the muscle to be able to store carbohydrate or how quickly the muscle burns through carbohydrates. We did a resting metabolic test, which is just a test of how much carbohydrate and how much fat you're burning at rest along with an exercise metabolic test, which is a measurement of how much carbohydrate, how much fats, and how many calories you're burning during exercise.

Long story short is that, and I'm sure that you know this based on your conversation with Dr. Volek. Even though most physiology textbooks will inform us that we can burn about 1.0 grams of fat per minute during exercise, the athletes who followed a ketotic or low-carbohydrate diet for close to 12 months, were experiencing fat oxidation values of closer to 1.5 to 1.8 grams of fat per minute, significantly higher than what you would expect. There's not only a glycogen sparing effect in a scenario like that, but there's also some pretty significant health implications, meaning that you're creating fewer free radicals, and experiencing less fermentation in the gut, and experiencing less fluctuations in blood sugar.

I guess one of the more annoying parts, for me, about the whole results of that test was that people said, “Oh, they call it the FASTER study, but you guys weren't going any faster, you guys who did the high-fat diet.” That's not the idea. That is where, I think, people get derailed a little bit. The goal here is not to go faster. The goal here is to go as fast, to figure out a way to limit the health effects, or eliminate the health effects of chronic fluctuations in blood sugar or chronically elevated blood sugar, while still maintaining similar speeds. That was my whole philosophy going into this. If I could go just as fast by eliminating sugars, why not do it? If I slow down, then I have to ask myself that question of what kind of balance do I want between health and performance? How many years of my life, or how many years of my joints, or how much gut distress, am I willing to sacrifice in exchange for going just a little bit faster? Now fortunately, it turns out that you can go just as fast, again, not faster, but just as fast on a carbohydrate-limited diet. Why not do it?

Dr. Pompa:
Yeah, I've got echo. Maybe you could mute. There's an echo. I'm not sure where the echo's coming from.

Ben:
Try that. I plugged in my headphones, so may be less of an echo now.

Dr. Pompa:
Oh, yeah. Perfect. I don't hear it. Can you hear me?

Ben:
Yeah.

Dr. Pompa:
Yeah, great. I'm glad you brought that up because I always say, “Look, go as fast with this diet” Like you said, “It's not to go faster.” “It's to go as fast,” but what I always say is, “but live longer.” What's happening is these high-carb athletes – there are problems from joint problems, heart attacks. It's just getting more and more that these people are dropping dead, and having horrible degenerative disease, and yet they're thin, and yet they have all of this degenerative disease indicating years of inflammation and oxidative stress driven by glucose spike, insulin spike, after another, which we know is oxidative and damaging to the cells and obviously even ages you prematurely, really that's the problem. Ben, you're right.

I enjoy endurance sports myself, but we know that people that do a lot of endurance sports absolutely drive more oxidation and aging. I believe that that has changed. Your studies and others now have proven that that has changed with a fat-adapted athlete. Ben, I don't know your body fat, but I know I'm, at age 50, under 8%. Yet, we can go for hours, and hours, and hours, without ingesting carbohydrates because we're very efficient fat burners. I think your studies prove that and just to bring it back to people what Ben was talking about, they used to say that people that were very efficient at fat burning can at least burn a gram, one gram, per minute of exercise, but you proved that it was higher, much higher, almost two grams in someone who's fat adapted, their ability to burn fat while they're exercising.

Ben:
Yeah.

Dr. Pompa:
I thought that was really one of the best parts about the study is because there was even criticism in the beginning of you guys talk about this fat-adapt exercise, but where is the proof that you can burn that much fat during exercise? You won't do it on a high-carbohydrate diet. You only burn those numbers and that much fat while you're fat adapted.

Ben:
Yeah, I think that one of the important considerations here is you need to look at the length of time that the fat-adapted athletes in that study followed a high-fat diet. The researchers reached out to me a year prior to that test. Most of the athletes who I coach, or who I consult with who are doing well following a high-fat diet, have been following that for one to two years. Sure, you experience some of the health effects of lower blood sugar levels and less oxidation even after following a diet like this for a couple of weeks, but in terms of you achieving what’s called the mitochondrial density necessary for producing a lot of ATP on a high-fat diet while exercising, you’re looking at needed to be in it for the long haul.

Granted, in the whole scheme of things for an athlete who may want to compete in a sport for, say, 20 years, spending 6 months to 2 years getting yourself to a state where you can really efficiently use a natural source of fuel and limit oxidation, that’s not an incredibly long period of time. I do think a lot of people hear about this magical effect of a high-fat diet and you rush out and feel like crap, especially for those first two weeks. That’s something important to understand. You have to be in this for the long haul before you really begin to experience a lot of the favorable adaptations, before you begin to be able to go for really long periods of time without eating, and even exercise during those periods of time. I mean, it takes some time to build up to being adapted.

Dr. Pompa:
You know, Ben, I believe a lot of it’s epigenetic. I get these clients, and I get a lot of emails from the doctors that I train from their clients, saying, “You know, I am keto-adapted, and yet I’m still not burning fat,” etc., etc., and they’re worried about the weight loss. I explain that it takes time to become more and more efficient at burning fat and, therefore, the body feeling free that it can burn its fat even for energy.

It takes time, even it took my wife time. She did not click in for a long time before she was able to use her fat storage for energy. It was months and months, and really almost a year, before she became as efficient as myself. Now, her numbers are a lot; she’s now an efficient fat-burner. It’s so much easier for her to stay lean now. Meredith, you have asked that question, I think, to Volek and maybe D’Agostino about that time. You’ve said, “What’s the difference? It seems like women have a tougher time getting into that fat-burning efficiency.”

Ben:
Yeah, the other thing I think that’s important is the type of high-fat diet that you follow. There was a really interesting study last year that looked into the potential for high levels of chlorophyll in the bloodstream to be able to assist with ATP production. A very plant-rich, ketogenic diet is, in my opinion, favorable for not only limiting oxidation and free radical production, but also causing even more stable energy sources due to the fiber, but also potentially an increase in ATP production beyond what we fully understand in nutrition science when it comes to having a lot of plant-based chlorophylls in the bloodstream.

I see a lot of people follow, say, like the Bulletproof Coffee type of approach. They’ll have three cups of coffee with butter and MCT oil in it during the day, and they’ll have a big cut of fatty steak at dinner. Lunch might be coconut milk with some coconut flakes and some chocolate stevia. If you step back and look at the diet, maybe there’s some macadamia nuts sprinkled in here and there. There’s very little plant matter.

I personally eat about 20 to 25 servings of plants per day. We have an enormous backyard garden, and I’m eating tons of kale, and butter lettuce, and bok choy, and mustard greens, and cilantro, and parsley, and tomatoes. None of that counts towards my total daily carbohydrate intake, but I think that is one component that needs to be emphasized here, that a high-fat diet does not mean that you’re not eating plants. In fact, I eat a lot of plants, a lot of fiber, and it makes a night-and-day difference.

When I look over the blood and bile markers of people following a high-fat diet, a lot of times I see really high triglycerides and really low HDL, which is often what you’ll see in someone who is eating a ton of animal fats without many plants or without much fiber. I’ll see a lot of CO2 and really low chloride levels, an indicator of a net acidic state, and a lot of biomarkers that aren’t necessarily favorable and that can be a result of a high-fat diet done improperly. I think that’s one important thing to bear in mind, too, is that you don’t want to necessarily eschew plant intake and vegetable intake; you just want to ensure that those are accompanied primarily by healthy fats and oils rather than accompanied by high amounts of protein and starches.

Dr. Pompa:
Yeah, that’s great advice. I practice something, and I’ve written articles, Ben, about something I call diet variation, which is basically emulating what our ancestors have done. They were forced into different diet variations seasonally, even weekly. When we look at the Hunza people as an example, in the summertime, they were relying mostly on plant food. Then the wintertime came, and they were forced into higher-fat, obviously meats, and different fats and butters. They had this long stretch of mostly vegetables, which created this variation in their diet. Today, we have the ability to vary our diet at all times, which can work for us and against us.

I go into ketosis during the summer. Like you, I’m still able to stay in ketosis eating a lot of plants in my diet, no problem. I’m very fat-adapted even with it. In this time of year, I’m eating way more fruits and vegetables, and because I intermittent fast, where I don’t eat until a certain time, I’m not in ketosis in the morning, but by the afternoon, I’m burning high ketones again. It’s remarkable when you give your body time to get more efficient how you can almost benefit from being in ketosis and not being in ketosis. That’s what I’m doing now during the winter. I agree. I think that variation in the diet is really critical. I think it’s great.

Ben:
Yeah.

Meredith:
I’m wondering, too, I mean, 25 to 30 servings of vegetables, that’s amazing. How are you fitting all of those vegetables in? Are you doing a lot of smoothies, blended soups? What are some of your suggestions there?

Dr. Pompa:
Great question.

Ben:
For me, it’s mostly smoothies and salads. I do one to two really big smoothies a day, one of the big blenders that blend cell phones on YouTube, one of those big ones, not the cheapo KitchenAid, but a really nice blender that will just pulverize everything from the pit of an avocado to an entire bunch of kale, so a lot of plants. Generally, in the morning, I’m grabbing six to eight different plants, both wild plants and herbs, as well as more traditional plants like cucumbers or avocados, for example, from the refrigerator and just blending those up with coconut milk, and fats, and some seeds, and nuts. Lunch is a really big salad, an enormous salad bowl just full of vegetables. I’ll generally spend 30 to 60 minutes chewing each bite 20 to 25 times and eating lunch like a cow while I go through emails and things like that during lunch. That’s another big one. Dinner, generally another giant salad, really big salad. Then if I do have a snack during the day, a lot of times it’s just a smaller version of the smoothie that I’ve had for breakfast.

If you were to see the size of my salads and the size of my smoothies, you would be shocked. You’d think I would be morbidly obese, but if you dig in and you look at it, it’s really just mostly plant volume. That’s generally what I do, salads and smoothies. I’m not a big fan of soups. My wife does a lot of soups, like cold soups, and hot soups, and stuff like that. I’m just not a soup guy. Even my smoothies, I make them so thick I need to eat them with a spoon because I really like to chew my food. Yeah, I’m a smoothie and a salad guy.

Dr. Pompa:
What are some of your favorite fats that you like to take in in a day?

Ben:
Returning to that concept of variety you mentioned, it really does vary. Generally, the staples are full-fat coconut milk, avocados and avocado oil, olives and extra virgin olive oil, macadamia nuts, almonds, walnuts, pumpkin seeds; I always have a big thing of chia seeds slurry, where you just mix chia seeds with water and let those sit, and it’s just like a Jell-O. I have that that I’ll mix in, for example, with a lot of my smoothies. Animal fats aren’t a huge source. I do fish a couple of times a week. I’ll do some kind of a steak or a red meat a couple of times a week. I always have some pemmican around, which is a rendered fat recipe that’s in a tube that I can use when I’m on a plane or need a snack on the go.

I really don’t do a ton of animal fats. It’s mostly plant-based fats like some of the ones that I just mentioned. Those are most of the biggies. Bone broth does have a certain amount of fat in it, and we make broth every week. There’s some in there, too. Those are most of them, though. MCT oil, I’ll do that sometimes during exercise; coconut oil sometimes in the smoothies, even though I’m not a huge fan of those concentrated sources of oil versus the tastier forms like the extra virgin olive oil and the avocado oil. I just find those to be more flavorful, and I feel better on them. Yeah, those are some of the fats that I do.

Dr. Pompa:
How much exercise do you get a day? Tell us about your exercise regime. I should say a day and week.

Ben:
Yeah, not as much as people think. I generally am active all day long. Today, while I’m writing, and doing consults, and reading emails, and things along those lines, I’ll walk somewhere in the range of three to five miles at a low intensity like I am right now. When I get up in the morning, I’ll generally spend 20 to 30 minutes doing some deep-tissue work and some mobility work, some foam roller, some band work for traction on my joints. By the time I get to the end of the day, I’ve been mildly physically active for six to eight hours at just very low-level intensity.

Then at the end of the day, I’ll throw in 30 to 60 minutes of a hard workout. That might be a tennis match. It might be kickboxing or jujitsu. It might be some kind of an obstacle course workout with sandbags, and kettlebells, and things like that. It might be a swim. It varies quite a bit, but generally it’s 30 to 60 minutes of something hard in the afternoon to the early evening, then up until that point, low-level physical activity all day long. It’s just tough to quantify because I’m always moving. As far as a formal workout, it comes out to about 30 to 60 minutes a day.

Dr. Pompa:
It’s remarkable that you’re working and moving all at the same time. Isn’t it remarkable, Meredith? It’s like he’s active six to eight hours a day. It shows you there’s always time. For people watching this that say, “I don’t have time to do this or that,” you’re doing it. You’re doing it.

Meredith:
I’d like to go back to what you spoke about in the beginning with the experiment, and being in ketosis, and the impact on your gut and your microbiome. If you could speak to that, I’d like to learn a little bit more about that.

Ben:
Yeah, I didn’t see the results yet, interestingly, from that test. A few of the things that I would suspect if I could hypothesize, for example, is that in someone eating a higher-fat diet, you would definitely, especially if you were doing butter or coconut oil, for example, likely have slightly higher levels of butyric acid. If you’re eating more plant-rich diet, probably higher levels of short-chain fatty acids and just better colonic health overall. I would imagine you’d probably have lower risk of yeast fungus, candida, the type of overgrowths that might occur with high starch or sugar intake, or high alcohol intake. I’m not really sure what would happen with some of the other bacteria like the Firmicutes or some of these things that are associated with adiposity. I’m not quite sure how those change on a high-fat versus a high-carb diet.

Now, I did last week send in my skin, my tongue, and my stool sample to the American Gut Project. When they send the results of that back to you, you get to see how your gut matches up to the general population. That particular test is accompanied by a diet questionnaire, so that might give me some insight, as well. In my own gut tests that I’ve done, though, I do generally have a lot of short-chain fatty acids and fats in the large intestine, from a colonic standpoint. I have really good colonic health. I generally, since I started into this, gosh, four years ago, I don’t have the fermentation, the gas, the bloating, the constant farts that endurance athletes have, all that kind of stuff. That’s not something that I deal with anymore at all, which is kind of cool. I would, again, hazard a guess that there’s a lower risk for things like small intestine bacterial overgrowth, and probably a lower risk for just fermentation overall. Again, if you’re eating a diet rich in plant foods—and I also do a lot of fermented foods, we do a lot of kimchi, kombucha, we do a lot of pickling and fermenting of our cucumbers and our beans, and things along those lines, overall bacterial diversity on plant-rich, fat-rich diet is probably quite high, again, due to the short-chain fatty acids, the butyrate’s, and then all the plant matter and the prebiotics.

Dr. Pompa:
Yeah, yeah, exactly. I mean, you’re obviously a very well-trained athlete, showing that athletes can be fat-adapted and utilizing fat is their energy source, their number one energy source, but you’re getting your carbohydrates from your vegetables, right? I always explain that, look, I believe I eat a normal carbohydrate diet, what humans were supposed to eat. We talked about a little bit about that today, even people that think they’re eating low-carb—really this is just the way that humans were meant to eat. It just so happens in our society we call it a low-carb diet. I call it a normal carbohydrate diet; moving in and out of ketosis throughout my day—I mean at different times.

If you weren’t eating for a period of times, your ketones are going to surge, your glucose is going to drop, that’s what’s natural.

Ben:
Right. I do a lot of hunting and foraging and wilderness survival type of stuff, and typically, if I’m out there without foods that I’ve brought in, what am I eating? I’m eating mushrooms, mint, nettle, leafy greens, dandelion, and then that’s combined with any animals I might encounter with the understanding that if I’m eating an animal and it’s at night and I’m on a campfire, I know to go for the fats because that’s what’s going to keep me going the next day. You don’t get very satiated from gnawing on the breast area of a rabbit, for example; you always want to go after the gizzards. I know in the gizzards there’s a lot of fat. If you look at things from an ancestral standpoint, if you’re out in the wilderness, you’re not coming across a lot of apple trees, you’re definitely not finding many bakeries, it’s mostly just plants, and mushrooms, and small amounts of animal proteins, and large amounts of animal fats and oils.

Dr. Pompa:
Yeah. How much protein—you said it percentage-wise, but how about gram-wise—how much do you weigh and then how much protein, on average, in grams do you get per day?

Ben:
I weight about 180 pounds and I would say I’m somewhere in the range of 100 to 120 grams, or so, of protein. That would be on the high range. I don’t get anywhere near the 200+ grams that I used to take in as a bodybuilder. I try and stay as close to at least 0.5 grams of protein per pound of body weight because that amount is necessary to avoid loss of muscle, but I never, ever, really exceed 0.8 grams per pound—or that’s pretty rare just because there’s not a lot of evidence that there’s a great deal of anabolism that takes place once you exceed that amount.

Dr. Pompa:
Yeah, I’m with you. I think people today they move into, well, I guess what’s in rage right now is The Paleo Diet, right? Then people start eating a bunch of protein. I’m not a fan. I’ve read the studies of high-protein and I know that it’s not a healthy diet. Of course, through gluconeogenesis even turn into sugar. I always tell people as a general rule, half your body weight—considering that you’re not morbidly obese—half your body weight is a very safe—you’re an athlete, you can take a lot more than even the average person and utilize that protein safely. I think I agree with your range there.

Ben:
Yeah. Like you said, it all depends on your nitrogen balance, if you’re a hard-charging person, and doing a lot of physical exercise, and you have a high-level of muscle mass to support, then you might need to get closer to the 0.7 to 0.8 grams per pound. Most people can maintain anabolism and health at 0.55 or so.

Dr. Pompa:
Yeah, I agree; it’s a good number.

Meredith:
I’m wondering, Dr. Pompa, you had mentioned about your fasting experience. Ben, I was wondering if you could speak to your fasting experiences. I think that I heard that you do practice fasting, but I didn’t know if you spend longer fasts or what your experience has been and how that’s impacted your training and your health.

Ben:
Yeah, I generally do, every month, a 24-hour fast, just to clean things out a little bit. It’ll just be a Saturday at lunchtime until Sunday at lunchtime, or I’ll just skip dinner on Saturday night and breakfast on Sunday morning.

Meredith:
Are you drinking some water? Is it just a water-fast?

Ben:
Yeah, just water or coffee, tea, stuff like that, sometimes kombucha.

Dr. Pompa:
I don’t know if you ever—it’s hard for me to recommend some people to go watch the videos because these guys drop a lot of f-bombs, and it might be offensive to some, but they’re called the Hodgetwins. You can Google them. They’re funny. I have to admit that they’re funny even though they’re a little rough around the edges. These guys are bodybuilders, right? Ben, your past. They intermittent fast, they go 19-20 hours. They used to be into the 5-6 meal a day thing and they realized that it wasn’t working like they expected. Someone encouraged them—I don’t know their exact story. Now they’ve been doing this for a while so all of their videos are on intermittent fasting and how it raises their growth-hormone, testosterone. Now they’ve gained all this muscle, I think 20 pounds since they’ve been doing it, and they’re under 6% body fat. Watch the videos, I think that you would gain some insight out of it, it’s pretty humorous. I actually think these guys are pretty smart, they put on a little act for the YouTube videos, but they get a million hits on their videos. It’s pretty funny.

Ben:
Bodybuilders are pretty smart. There’s that whole pro-science thing and a lot of these guys are biology-hackers. You’d be surprised at what it takes to get your body down to, say, 3% body fat while staying pretty big, especially if you’re not going to take a lot of steroids or testosterone, and stuff like that. It’s tough, so yeah, I agree, bodybuilders a lot of times are smarter than they get credit for.

To respond to your question about fasting: I’ll do the 24-hour about once a month and then every single day I just have a 12-16-hour fast. Most of it, of course, is overnight, but generally I’ll finish dinner around 7:00 or 8:00 p.m. and breakfast will be somewhere around 9 to 10:30 a.m. That’s just a daily practice for me. Typically, at some point during that time range I’ll do something very low-level in the morning, like yoga and  rolling, and mobility work, so there’s a little bit of aerobic work in there, too. That seems to help, pretty significantly, in maintaining a low body fat percentage. Just combine a little bit of easy aerobic activity or even something like cold thermogenesis, try a little bit of a cold soak, or sauna combined with a cold soak, that seems to help me out quite a bit with staying lean by working some type of activity in there.

Dr. Pompa:
I do that. I take hot saunas and then do cold showers afterwards. Yeah, it works if you’re fat burning, pretty significantly. Yeah, I started out when I was intermittent fasting like you I started out I was doing 15-16 hours and then I pushed it. It seemed like the longer I pushed it the more hormone-sensitive, no doubt, I’d become more important that is, trust me. I noticed a difference, immediately; even my ability to hold onto my muscle. The growth hormone rise and the hormone sensitivity occur the longer I go, for sure. You do a lot of endurance stuff, so I could see you needing to shorten that window slightly, as far as how active you are, Ben.

Ben:
Yeah, most of that’s due to those evening workouts I do. They are pretty tough because I’m still racing professionally as an obstacle racer. A workout for me—when I’m saying 30-60 minutes in the afternoon, after a day of being on my feet and moving for 6-8 hours, we’re talking about a workout where the average heart rate is very close to maximum heart rate, so like a puke-fest style workout. That’s pretty draining from an energy standpoint. Generally, for me to do daily—exceeding 16-hour fasts daily—that gets tough. I mean, of course, the other issue’s that my wife is an amazing, amazing, cook and so I can only skip so many meals during the day before I feel like I’m missing out on a very important part of life.

Dr. Pompa:
I think at your activity level I think that you’re still getting that benefit; like you said, you exercise. I would exercise that intently at night when I do. I’d definitely have to eat earlier, there’s no doubt. You’re still getting the benefit; you’re still getting the growth hormone rise, even with the fast. Ben, once a week I do a 24-hour fast. This week I did two of those, not even on purpose; I just went from dinner to dinner. It was remarkable. I love to watch what my body—I ended up doing two in a row like that, just because of my busy schedule. It was remarkable, but I felt like I definitely—noticeably more energy on those days, and noticeably leaner, and yet didn’t lose one once of muscle; matter of fact, maybe the opposite. My gym workouts were super strong.

I’m not nearly doing the athletic stuff that you’re doing these days. I admire that you keep a busy schedule working and you’re still doing all that, Ben. I mean, I find that really impressive. What you’re doing is working. It shows you what we do works, right? I mean, you have busted the mold for these high-carbohydrate endurance athletes. You really have. I find it remarkable, and you took it to the science, Ben. I think that’s impressive as well.

Ben:
Cool. Thanks, man.

Dr. Pompa:
Yeah, yeah. No doubt about it. I mean, as far as that goes, where are you going with it? You love doing the studies, you love doing this stuff. What do you see yourself doing here in the future with it?

Ben:
I’d like to look into more of an ancestral application, a more practical application. I would like to look a little bit more into persistence hunting not just persistence hunting, but perhaps something closer to where I live where I’d be going after elk or moose or something like that. Preferably in the snow where tracking is a little bit easier, but seeing if it’s doable to go out and, say, head out on a anywhere from five to eight day hunt is realistically what you’re looking at with a bow, or with a spear, or with a close-range weapon, and seeing if it’s possible to actually go and get your own food in the absence of food, just to begin to get people thinking about the state that we live in, the culture that we live in where food is just constantly readily available. What would happen if we didn’t have food but we had to figure out a way to feed ourselves?

The same is to be said for foraging and for wild plant-based foraging. This is something I already do with my kids. In the summers, for example, we usually have one day a week where they can only eat what they’ve found outside until dinner. From breakfast until dinner they can only eat wild plant matter, things that they foraged for outside. They’re not old enough yet to be killing squirrels or coyotes or anything like that, so for them it’s just plants, right? As part of their childhood they have had to learn to figure out how to go out and take care of themselves by going and getting plants. They come back inside, they’re allowed to use the stove, they’re allowed to use the blender, stuff like that, but they can’t use ingredients from the pantry, or from the refrigerator; it’s all based on plants.

I would like to get people more aware of that type of practice because it really goes quite handily with the things that we’ve talked about—fasting and ketosis, and denial of modern food sources and starches and instead just learning how to take care of yourself. I think that there’s a lot of lessons to be had from a health and survival standpoint, and so plant foraging, spreading our message, as well as the potential of seeing the persistence hunting in the absence of any significant sources of calories, to be able to take what allows one to, say, do an Ironman Triathlon with very little calorie intake and then turn that into a more practical level like going out and getting your own meat and stuff. Again, without carrying a bunch of power-bars out with you, I think that’d be a cool little adventure to embark upon.

Dr. Pompa:
Yeah, that’s fantastic! I can’t wait to hear the results. I’ll tell you what, I’m going to have my kids watch the show and I’m going to say, yeah, so you think you have it bad in the Pompa house—his kids forage for their meals. I’m going to get another level of respect out of that, maybe. They’re not going to hassle me anymore. My kids are always my experiments, right? It’s always humorous. I have two of them now—I had them in severe ketosis—one’s still in it. Now I have them intermittent fasting, I vary their diet. They do what I tell them to do, that’s the fun part. It’s like, let’s try a higher carb, let’s try this, and I’m watching their performance level so it’s always fun. Gosh, that’s why we have kids, Meredith. See, that’s why you’ve got to have some kids, you’ve got to experiment.

Ben, you know what I think you’re going to find with that? I think you’re going to find what I say is, look, I believe that part of—really, we see it as far as getting patients or clients back to health, varying their diets, forcing these changes, ketosis. Fasting states, making and forcing these changes, is part of what our body is meant to do to adapt, but what comes with that adaptation is massive genetic changes that take place; turning off bad genes, turning on good ones, becoming more hormone sensitive.

Part of what I teach, Ben, to my doctors, is forcing their clients into these adapted states where their body’s forced to adapt. We interviewed Thomas Seyfried a few months ago and he believes that when we’re forced into these states, fasting states, it is the bad cells do not make the—they can’t adapt and the bad cells start dying, too. Autolytic behavior starts to take place, where the body starts eating the bad cells. It’s forcing our bodies to adapt. Having to adapt what you’re describing is what our ancestors had to do. There is health to this type of adaptation and diet variation so, really, you’re going to find that when you do those experiments. I can’t wait to hear it.

Ben:
Yeah, that or I’ll just wind up dead in the wilderness somewhere.

Dr. Pompa:
You’re going to be forced to adapt, alright. Actually, I was hiking up—we do this hike a few times a week; we hike up the mountain and there on the right was this massive spine. I think it was a moose because typically we encounter wildlife like moose on this hike. It was this massive spine and, of course, my dogs went right after it. Hopefully you don’t end up like that, as just another prey.

Ben:
I hope not.

Dr. Pompa:
Lines around here so be careful, Ben.

Ben:
I will.

Dr. Pompa:
This is great stuff. Meredith, I know you have a list of questions so I don’t want to—we have a few minutes left. I know, Ben, you have a whole line.

Meredith:
I know we do just have a few minutes left. Ben, I want to thank you so much for being on the show. I’m wondering if you have any advice for our audience who’s watching, who wants to do some things like you’re doing, obviously, not to that extreme. What would you suggest to some of our viewers who really want to increase their performance, want to implement some of these strategies that you’re employing? Where would they start and what would be fed?

Ben:
I would emphasis what we touched on towards the beginning of this call, the idea that your life can be fitness. After we finish our call today, I will get off the treadmill and before the next call I’ll go and check the mail. After I grab the mail I’ll sprint back up the driveway, really, really hard. I’ll get to the top of the driveway and I’ll crank out 25 pushups. Then I’ll open up the mail, take care of the mail, and head back down to my next call. Little things like that add up during the day. They get you to the point where you really can go out and do things like an Ironman Triathlon, or a Spartan Beast, or something like that, and not have to spend your whole life exercising, right? It’s fun, too, because you have energy all day long, right?

You don’t standup because your flexors have been shortened for hours and have back pain. I would say just figure out a way to hack your environment to make physical activity something that you do all day long. If you work in a traditional office setting, put a kettlebell underneath your desk, and get one of these stools that you lean back on rather than sitting down, every time that you go to the bathroom have a rule that you’ve got to do 50 air squats. Start to work in those little things throughout the day. You’d be surprise at how fit you can stay and how prepared you can be for a big event without necessarily neglecting your family, and your friends, and hobbies, and work, and stuff like that.

Dr. Pompa:
Yeah. That’s great, Ben. You live an amazing lifestyle. I know you’ve been an inspiration to our viewers and listeners, so that’s fantastic. For them, where can they go to read the article, the study that we referenced? You mentioned it in the beginning but—they can go and get that link.

Ben:
I have it linked to—if you go to bengreenfieldfitness.com, my latest article on this topic is entitled “How to Get into Ketosis.” If you were to go there you’re not only going to find a link to that site, but also a link to some of the other articles I’ve written on turning yourself into a fat-burning machine, high-fat diets, things like that. I would go read my article. You would probably just open Goggle—if you were to Goggle how to get into ketosis. Then I’ve also got a about a 450-page book that’s just jam-packed with bio-hacks, and meals, and work-outs, and everything. That’s at beyondtrainingbook.com.

Dr. Pompa:
Alright. Ben, thank you so much, man. Go get your mail, sprint up the driveway, and don’t forget the 25 pushups.

Ben:
Alright.

Dr. Pompa:
Thanks for the inspiration and the knowledge.

Ben:
Sounds good. Got it.

Thank you, guys.

Dr. Pompa:
Yup. Absolutely.

Meredith:
Thank you, guys. Take care. Thanks for watching, everyone.

Ben:
Bye.

Meredith:
Yup. See you next week. Bye.

104: Ketogenic Diet Expert Dr. Jeff Volek

Transcript of Episode 104: Ketogenic Diet Expert Dr. Jeff Volek

With Dr. Daniel Pompa, Meredith Dykstra, and special guest Dr. Jeff Volek.

Meredith:
Welcome to Cellular Healing TV. This is Episode 104, and I have Dr. Pompa here, and we have special guest Dr. Jeff Volek on the call. We have an awesome topic for you guys today, and we’re going to be talking about the Ketogenic Diet. And how it not only can impact disease and improve our health, but also impact our athletic performance. So that’s a subject we haven’t really delved into a lot on the show yet so really exciting topic. Before I introduce Dr. Volek, I’d like to read his bio, so you guys can learn a little bit more about what he’s doing.

So Dr. Jeff Volek is a registered dietician and professor in the Department of Human Sciences at Ohio State University. For the last two decades he’s been performing cutting-edge research elucidating how humans adapt to diets restricted in carbohydrates with a dual focus on clinical and performance applications. His work has contributed to the existing robust science of ketones and ketogenic diets, their use as a therapeutic tool to manage insulin resistance, plus their emerging potential to augment human performance and resiliency. This research indicates that well-formulated ketogenic diets result in substantial improvements in insulin resistance and the myriad of cardio-metabolic biomarkers associated with metabolic syndrome, cholesterol, and lipoprotein profiles. He’s also performed seminal research on a wide range of dietary supplements that can augment performance and recovery. He’s accumulated an enormous amount of laboratory and clinical data as it pertains to biomarker discovery and formulation of personalized, effective, and sustainable low-carbohydrate diets.

His team is currently exploring the role of nutritional ketosis induced by and/or supplements to: 1) reverse type-2 diabetes, 2) alter gut microbiota, 3) favorably impact tumor metabolism and help outcomes in women with advanced breast cancer, and 4) extend human and physical and cognitive capabilities in elite athletes and military personnel. Dr. Volek has secured several million dollars in research funds from federal sources, industry, and foundations. He’s been invited to lecture on his research over 200 times at scientific and industry conferences in a dozen countries. And his scholarly work includes 300 plus peer-reviewed scientific manuscripts and 5 books, including a New York Times Best Seller. So a very impressive bio, and welcome to the show, Dr. Volek. Thanks so much for joining us.

Dr. Volek:
Thank you, Meredith. Pleased to be here.

Dr. Pompa:
Yeah. Yeah. Hey, Jeff, yeah, and I just want to thank you myself. Yeah, I said years ago, I read this. We think 2011, 2012, and if you look through it, oh my gosh, all the notes and the studies. And it was just one of the best studied and referenced books on low-carbohydrate diets and ketosis that I have ever read. So this is one of many. But thank you so much for the research you do. I don’t know if I should call you professor or just call you Jeff.

Dr. Volek:
Please do, yes. Yeah, first name basis.

Dr. Pompa:
Okay. But yeah, Jeff, we have a lot in common that I’m on one side teaching doctors around the country to do what we do, and ketosis is a tool that we use in conditions that you study from diabetes, to heart disease, to fixing the gut, which you mentioned the microbiota. We utilize ketosis in so many ways, and so I’m sure we’ve referenced a lot of your research. So with that said, I have to ask you. I mean, that’s been the area of study for you for the longest time. I mean diabetes and heart disease. Speak just a little bit about that. Because I believe that, especially with heart disease, most people would think a high-fat diet would be the cause of heart disease. Jeff, we grew up in the time where saturated fat was evil, and cholesterol is still evil, and it was a cause of heart disease. Your research shows the opposite.

Dr. Volek:
Yeah, well, first of all, thanks for having me here, and I’m very pleased that you enjoyed the book. We actually wrote it for physicians so my colleague and I, Steve Phinney, and other healthcare professionals, including dieticians, and nurses, and really, any educated folks that are interested in nutrition. And we wrote it primarily because the ketogenic diet is not taught in any curriculum and, really, anywhere. So we wanted to give people information about the science and also the art. Because it really transcends the science in many ways when you get into the weeds in how you would actually implement this. So I’m glad you thought it was helpful and useful. So, yeah, in regards to the issue of diabetes and heart disease, I guess I’d like to start and just talk a little bit about the history of this problem. Because I think people may be generally aware of where all this started and where we’re at.

But just briefly, the first Dietary Guidelines came out in 1980, and that really started the low-fat diet-heart hypothesis, and the offspring of that was, of course, the low-fat diet. And so we’ve now got 35 years of this paradigm that we have—or experiment, if you will, that we began in the 80s or, really, the 70s with Ancel Keys prior to the Dietary Guidelines.

Dr. Pompa:
Yeah. He’s the one who wrote saturated fat.

Dr. Volek:
Exactly. And so if you think of this as a massive experiment in Americans, you look at what’s happened today. Two-thirds of adults in the U.S. are overweight. One-third are obese. Now this is staggering. Fifty percent of adults in the U.S. have prediabetes, and so we just have this massive suffering. And it really extends beyond that. There’s a financial burden on this. We spend about $300 billion today just managing diabetes alone.

So I think it’s time to stop this experiment. The problem is no one’s really wanting to be accountable, and we’re still fighting the government, USDA, and Dietary Guidelines which are trying to continue to promote this low-fat paradigm and demonizing saturated fat, demonizing meat, and all the dogma that we’ve been hearing for 35 years, which just, quite frankly, hasn’t worked at all. It’s been an epic failure, and you need to—we need to embrace, really, 15 solid years of research that has been supporting an alternative approach which is really focused more on reducing carbohydrate and finding a—for each person, finding their correct level of carbohydrate that matches their tolerance, and that’s really what we should focus on. But that doesn’t get reflected in any professional organization, any of their position statements, or any of the Dietary Guidelines. So that’s what’s frustrating from my perspective. Because there’s been a lot of great scientist and researchers publishing work in this area, and it’s being ignored.

Dr. Pompa:
Yeah.

Dr. Volek:
And we need more physicians like you that are challenging the dogma and going against the grain, literally.

Dr. Pompa:
Yeah. Yeah, I mean, it’s interesting you say that because, really, it’s new to humans the amount of carbohydrates that we’re eating. I mean, if you look back at the history of humans and the diets they’ve eaten, I mean, this is a new thing, high-carbohydrate diets. I mean, even the amount of grain or just even grain in the human diet is really a new thing when you look at the evolution of humans. It really is, Jeff. And do you believe that some of the increases in diabetes and heart disease are because of what we’re doing, the amount of carbohydrates we’re eating in a modern diet?

Dr. Volek:
Absolutely. So the diet-heart hypothesis and the low-fat diet was intended to lower cholesterol which in turn was supposed to lower risk for heart disease. But what happened, it really backfired, was that as people were trying to restrict fat, they replaced those calories with more carbohydrate, including a lot of sugar and processed carbohydrates. And so instead of lowering cholesterol and reducing heart disease, what we did is we created an epidemic or, really, pandemic around the planet of prediabetes and diabetes, which in turn is a strong risk factor for heart disease.

So we have this unintended consequence of over emphasizing restriction in fat that has really caused this unintended consequence of metabolic syndrome in diabetes. And so we really need to rethink the whole process and paradigm, and in my mind, it’s overconsumption of carbohydrate relative to a person’s tolerance that is driving almost all chronic disease, including diabetes, heart disease, and probably cancer, and Alzheimer’s, and Parkinson’s.

Dr. Pompa:
Yeah.

Dr. Volek:
And you can really have remarkable effects when you back off on the carbohydrates. How much do you need to back off? That gets into really complex issues, but at least getting that message across to folks I think would do a great deal of benefit for a large number of people, and give them—empower them or enable them to be able to eat more fat and restrict carbs does a tremendous amount of benefit to your health.

Dr. Pompa:
Jeff, when I read—and by the way, folks, this is “The Art and Science of Low-Carbohydrate Living,” and then the other book that I tore up of yours is “The Art and Science of Low-Carbohydrate Performance,” which is the white book that I was digging for. I think I leant it out, and there’s all my notes in there. I better get it back. But anyways, in this book, I remember you stating that some of the criticism with a high-fat, or a keto diet, or even just a low-carbohydrate diet with heart disease I think was the critique, maybe even diabetes, when you looked at the studies and me too of what they called a low-carbohydrate diet, for you and I, it would either be a moderate-carbohydrate diet or even a high-carbohydrate diet. I mean, some of these studies, Jeff, that I saw were looking at carbohydrate diets 180, 200 carbohydrates daily. Now, to me, that’s a high-carbohydrate diet. What’s your take on that?

Dr. Volek:
Oh, absolutely. I think everything’s relative. So if they were eating 400 grams, then maybe they get some benefit by going down to 200. But for many, many folks, 200 is nowhere near low enough to really regain metabolic health. And so most of my work over the last two decades, we’ve been looking at diets that are under 50 grams per day, and for most people, that induces a metabolic state of nutritional ketosis. And we continue to learn more about just incredible health benefits associated with being in a state of nutritional ketosis. And so very few of these studies that you’re referring to had carbohydrate levels low enough to induce ketosis, but the ones that have, the results are just absolutely remarkable in terms of reversal of diabetes, improvements in all sorts of cardio-metabolic risk factors. And as you were alluding to, even on the endurance side and performance side, there’s even evidence now that that may be more optimal for certain athletes.

Dr. Pompa:
Yeah. Talk about some of the improvements that you see with diabetes and heart disease. Because a lot of folks watching our shows, obviously, they have those concerns, and we utilize ketosis as a tool in those conditions and, obviously, others. I mean, we’ve had conversations with Professor Seyfried about cancer. But talk a little bit about those because you’ve studied a lot about diabetes and heart disease.

Dr. Volek:
Well, if you can get a person that has diabetes into nutritional ketosis—and we can certainly do that. I don’t want to trivialize it, but I also want to make the point that a ketogenic diet, although it’s less than 50, probably less than 40 grams for a type-2 diabetic to induce ketosis, that actually has quite a bit of variety in it. It’s not a burdensome diet.

Dr. Pompa:
Yeah.

Dr. Volek:
You’d be absolutely amazed at how much variety and how pleasurable and palatable a ketogenic diet can be. So we can certainly get these diabetics to consume this type of diet, and not just short-term, on a long-term basis.

Dr. Pompa:
Yeah.

Dr. Volek:
And when you do that, we can normalize hemoglobin A1c in blood sugar levels in the vast majority of people with diabetes in three to six months.

Dr. Pompa:
Yeah. I’ve done that as well, Jeff.

Dr. Volek:
So that in and of itself is remarkable, but the other really important part of that is we do that while they’re getting off medication and while they continue to lose weight because most of them are also overweight or obese.

Dr. Pompa:
Yeah.

Dr. Volek:
And that’s exactly the opposite of what happens when you try to really control blood sugar using standard of care, which is to give more medication. And when you give more insulin and more diabetes medications, the side effect is weight gain, and we know that there’s a lot of other undesirable effects of overmedicating to control blood sugars. So there’s really [00:14:35] an incredibly powerful tool that is getting diabetics off medication, allowing them to lose weight, and normalize their condition. So that’s really powerful. I mean, we spend four times as much money managing diabetes as we do cancer, but it doesn’t seem to get the same attention. And just the level of suffering in this country and, really, around the world, this is not something that’s isolated to the U.S. by any means. All developed countries are suffering from increases in diabetes and obesity.

So this is something that can be employed around the planet to help our colleagues across the sea, and China, now, has 100 million people with type-2 diabetes. India, I think, has similar levels. So this is something that’s affecting over, really, half the population has some level of diabetes, whether that be pre- or full on type-2 diabetes.

Dr. Pompa:
Hey, Jeff, speak a little bit about—because we had a conversation with Professor Seyfried about cancer, and he always says the key is lowering glucose, right? If you don’t lower glucose, people don’t lose weight. If you don’t lower glucose, tumors don’t shrink. So as glucose drops, ketones rise, and I—my doctors and myself, we realize that, and even people that are on a—in a keto diet, if we don’t see a drop in glucose, we seem to see no weight loss. So we have noted that restriction is very important to often times get the glucose down. Some people—most people that are healthy, when they go into a keto diet, they start—their appetite starts to go down as they become more efficient fat burners. But that doesn’t happen for everybody, and therefore, often times their glucose doesn’t drop because they’re still eating, perhaps, too much. What’s your thought on that?

Dr. Volek:
Yeah. I think there’s a lot of, perhaps, holes in our knowledge here, but our experience, when you really get the diet correct and the term I like to use is a well-formulated ketogenic diet, glucose does normalize in most people. A lot of people run into problems when they overconsume protein, and protein can get converted to glucose and actually inhibit ketosis. What we find is, when people are keto-adapted, keto-adaptation is a process that takes at least several weeks. Maybe in certain pathways it may take months or even years to fully keto-adapt. But one of the most profound metabolic adaptations to keto-adaptation is you switch fuel to almost exclusive reliance on fatty acids and ketones. And the corollary to that is you also significantly reduce glucose flux or glucose uptake in the cells. So when we measure, for example, respiratory quotient in people who are keto-adapted, they are at close to .7 or .71, which is an indication that they’re burning 90% plus of their energy from fat, and that implies also that there’s a significant inhibition of glucose metabolism in uptake in the cells. Now a lot of people don’t quite—they flirt with that keto-adaptation, so they’re not quite there, and I think those are the ones where the glucose trickles up.

And they—I would imagine—and we haven’t studied this, and I don’t think there’s a lot of direct evidence. But I would imagine you’re not going to get the full benefits in cancer unless you become fully keto-adapted and reduce that reliance and uptake of glucose in cells, and I think that that’s what Tom has really got his finger on well. That to get the full benefits of ketosis—I mean, we know ketones in and of themselves have a lot of important cellular effects that extend beyond just being an alternative fuel for the brain, which is what the standard function of ketones are. But we know now that they’re having potent drug-like effects or hormone-like effects in cells that are turning on pathways that are related to protection from oxidative stress, for example, that are the same pathways that are upregulated in the studies that have looked at longevity and anti-aging. And so having the ketones is important to get those signaling effects. And then the flip side is having low glucose is equally important, especially for the tumors that are relying on glucose for fuel.

So I do think Tom really has this right where it’s the combination of both. You got to have ketones high, and you got to have glucose low. And how we best do that in people I think we’re still trying to figure out. Because now we have ketone supplements we can give people. There are many different versions of ketogenic diets that people can play with, and which ones are ideal for certain types of cancers and so forth, in humans anyway, we don’t really understand this very well.

Dr. Pompa:
Yeah, we have noted that when we get the ketones up, the glucose down, that’s where the magic does happen, right?

Dr. Volek:
Yeah.

Dr. Pompa:
It’s the ketones turn off bad genes. The ketones down regulate cell inflammation. The ketones do decrease that oxidation, and then, likewise, the lower glucose, same thing. So it’s such a win-win, and I always give three reasons why. If someone’s not getting into ketosis or not losing weight, they could—obvious, they may need to lower their carbohydrates more, right? I mean, everyone’s genetically different. Some people can get in at 50. Some people, I’ve had people get in at 80, for goodness sakes. Some people have to drop it down to 20 or 30. So that’s a factor.

Second factor you mentioned, eating too much protein. Gluconeogenesis, it can turn to sugar. I’ve seen that as a factor. In some people, just consuming too much food. They’re just simply consuming too much food, and Tom talked a lot about that so three reasons for people to look at if they’re not getting the results. And then, Meredith, you had a question. Because gender, right, some women have trouble crossing in, especially in the beginning. Sometimes I have to move them in and out of trying to get into ketosis before they break in. So gender, does gender play a role, Jeff?

Dr. Volek:
Well, I think, yeah, it can. But our experience is it’s more related to the level of insulin resistance.

Dr. Pompa:
Yeah, okay.

Dr. Volek:
So if you have any person, whether male or female, the higher the level of insulin resistance, generally, the more difficult it is to get them in ketosis and the longer it takes to keto-adapt.

Dr. Pompa:
What about the…

Dr. Volek:
Importantly, they eventually do, and that’s what’s really important here. That no matter how insulin resistant you are, you retain this metabolic pathway to adapt to ketosis. It’s so ancient. It’s part of our—it’s just so—a huge part of our human evolution, and it’s almost always perfectly intact, even in the most profoundly insulin resistant people, because burning fat and oxidizing ketones is not dependent on any of the insulin signally pathways. So that’s what’s so really elegant about this tool is it works great in people with insulin resistance. It makes them completely able to have ideal fuel flow, even though they may remain insulin resistant.

Dr. Pompa:
What about thyroid resistance? Obviously, just general hormone resistance but we’ve noted, as physicians doing this, that our thyroid people, like diabetics, have more trouble getting in. However, you said it best. Eventually, they will. But speak to that a little bit.

Dr. Volek:
Well, in general, what we’ve seen is that sensitivity to many hormones increases when you’re keto-adapted.

Dr. Pompa:
Right, correct.

Dr. Volek:
That’s clearly the case with insulin. You often improve the insulin sensitivity in folks. We’ve also seen that with leptin. That leptin goes down markedly in folks, and it’s disproportional to the fat loss. So to me, that’s suggesting an improvement in leptin sensitivity. And then we also see a consistent drop in thyroid hormone, and I think there’s been a lot of misinterpretation and misinformation propagated around the thyroid hormone responses because we see absolutely no functional evidence that there’s any signs or symptoms of hypothyroidism. So metabolic rate doesn’t go down, and people aren’t cold and dry skin and all these types of things. So to us, that is an indication that people are just more sensitive to the thyroid hormone. So they can get by with having less circulating T3, and still maintain their metabolic rates. So I think in those three examples, they all point to more efficient hormonal regulation of cellular processes. So you don’t need to have as much hormone around.

Dr. Pompa:
Jeff, I couldn’t agree more. I believe hormone sensitivity is the key. We have most people walking around, even non-diabetics or even not even diagnosed as pre-diabetic, still having to many insulin and glucose spikes, which decrease the sensitivity of hormones. In vogue today is giving more hormones, whether it’s thyroid, whether it’s estrogen, testosterone. That’s in vogue. But I always say it’s like shouting at the kids. Eventually, they start hearing you less. So giving more hormones often times is needed. However, most often, it’s not the answer. The key is becoming more hormone sensitive at the cell, and that’s what I just heard you say.

Dr. Volek:
Yeah, absolutely. I think we’re entirely on the same page there.

Dr. Pompa:
Yeah. I really appreciate that. So Meredith, I know that you’ve had some other questions, and I do want you to speak a little bit about some results about heart disease. Because I think there’s a misconception that these diets are potentially bad for heart disease, but Meredith, you had a question on that before we leave that topic.

Meredith:
Well, I don’t know. Actually, I don’t think I did. I have a lot of questions about the impact of the ketogenic diet on athletic performance. So I think once we shift over into that, if you want to speak to your results on heart disease, Dr. Volek, that’d be wonderful, and I’d like to have a conversation on how it impacts our athletic performance too.

Dr. Pompa:
Yeah, great.

Dr. Volek:
Sure. Well, a lot of our work over the years has focused on understanding cholesterol and lipoprotein metabolism. And that is extended into looking at fatty acid composition, and that’s gotten us into looking at saturated fat metabolism when a person is keto-adapted. And what I can say is that almost every biomarker of cardiovascular risk improves on a ketogenic diet.

Dr. Pompa:
Yeah. I agree.

Dr. Volek:
And you can just go down the list. Triglycerides plummet. HDL goes up in most people, or in some, it stays the same. But it’s still a more potent tool than exercise and weight loss or any drug, really, in terms of the triglyceride decrease and HDL increase. So those are obviously positive. As the inflammatory markers get better, it’s a potent anti-inflammatory diet. Oxidative stress goes down. Now the one response that gets a lot of physicians nervous and anxious is the LDL cholesterol response.

Dr. Pompa:
I was going to ask.

Dr. Volek:
And we spent a great deal of time studying this. The reality is if you look at LDL cholesterol, I mean, I think, in general, we’ve overstated the importance of LDL cholesterol, and that’s largely been driven by greedy drug companies that want everybody to be on a statin.

Dr. Pompa:
Yes.

Dr. Volek:
But let’s just assume for a second LDL cholesterol may carry some increased risk of heart disease. What you’d see, though, is about half the people show an increase in LDL, and the other half show a decrease.

Dr. Pompa:
That’s right.

Dr. Volek:
But there’s probably about 10-20% of individuals who show quite a marked increase in LDL cholesterol.

Dr. Pompa:
Yes.

Dr. Volek:
Saying over 50 milligrams per deciliter, some people even higher, and that really alarms people. And I get emails every day almost from people. Should I go on a statin? My doctor’s going crazy. So this brings us to an important topic around LDL cholesterol in that we now have very good evidence that LDL cholesterol is a heterogenic particle. Meaning there’s a lot of different types of LDL cholesterol that range in size and range in density and composition.

Dr. Pompa:
That’s right.

Dr. Volek:
And we have very, very good evidence now that the small LDL particles are the ones that are most atherogenic, and these—it’s many reasons. They have a longer residence time in the circulation. They are more prone to oxidation. They can probably penetrate the arterial wall easier. And a low-carb ketogenic diet is more potent than anything, including statins, at decreasing these small atherogenic particles. So even if you’re one of these people that your total cholesterol and LDL went up quite a bit, almost all cases, your small LDL particles almost surely went down, and so that’s a really important fact that is going to be relevant in terms of cardiovascular risk.

Dr. Pompa:
Now, Jeff, I’m one of those unique people. When I—and I’ll explain why in a minute, but in the summertime, I actually go into ketosis. In the wintertime, I actually move out, and that’s for performance reason, which when we get there I’ll talk a little bit about. But I’m one of those odd people that my LDL does go up. My triglycerides dramatically go down. All of my glucose, inflammation markers, dramatically lower for the better when I’m actually in ketosis. However, my particle number of LDL actually raises. Now, my smalls don’t change. So my smalls are normal., but my particle number goes up.

Now you and I agree. Total cholesterol doesn’t matter. Even high LDL, I don’t think it matters. However, the particle number and the particle size, those two things lead to more oxidation. So now what about the particle’s number going up and not the size? What’s you’re feeling on that?

Dr. Volek:
Well, part of that particle number is driven by the total concentration increase. But the fact that your small LDL numbers aren’t changing or in most people they do go down, even if their total goes up, that is unlikely to contribute to higher risk in any of the—we don’t have the long-term studies. This is the limitation in most of this research where we’ve followed people long enough where you have heart endpoints. Where you’ve looked at mortality or you’ve looked at actual heart attacks. So you always have to look at these intermediates with a grain of salt because none of them are that great at predicting heart attack. I mean, over 50% of people who have heart attacks have perfectly normal LDL cholesterol. So that tells you right there that this is a pretty weak predictor of actual risk.

But this gets into a lot of nuances, and I think you’ve touched on a few things that make it more complicated than even particle size. And that’s, ultimately, are these particles oxidized and are they contributing to pro-inflammatory environment? Those are the processes that really contribute to atherosclerosis and plaque development in the arteries, and so if you’ve got a lot of cholesterol, even a lot of particles circulating in the plasma, hey, that’s fine. You just don’t want them in the arterial wall.

Dr. Pompa:
Yeah.

Dr. Volek:
In fact, having higher cholesterol may confer some protective effects.

Dr. Pompa:
Absolutely.

Dr. Volek:
I mean, that’s maybe a provocative statement, but there’s some evidence to support that. So cholesterol in the blood is good, cholesterol in the arteries, not good. What contributes to cholesterol in the arteries? Well, not so much the concentration but more the pro-inflammatory environment, the pro-oxidative environment that contributes to that. And those almost always get better on a ketogenic diet. Even if you happen to be one of these hyper-responders like yourself.

I’m just the opposite. I’ve been ketogenic for 20 years, and my cholesterol is more than 78, and so I don’t have to worry about it. But I know there’s a lot of people out there that—and it’s just genetics. We don’t understand how to predict those people, but we certainly see it. And I personally don’t think it’s a contraindication or something to worry about because it’s an isolated increase, and across the board, you look at every other risk factor, it gets better.

Dr. Pompa:
Well, I think you said it best. They’re ignoring the obvious. The glucose, the elevated glucose spikes, even in nondiabetics, and insulin spikes, which drive oxidation, is really the bigger problem than even the small amount of cholesterol they have is oxidizing. And oxidized cholesterol is the problem. Not total cholesterol. And I think we’re in total agreement there.

Dr. Volek:
So, yeah, the other piece of this that I’d like to mention quickly, it’s the composition of these particles. So if you have a lot of saturated fat inside your cholesterol—or your lipoprotein particles, that is a consistent risk factor for both diabetes and heart disease and certain types of cancer, and so this becomes a very important topic when it comes to heart disease. And it starts to tie back to the saturated fat paradigm. So it turns out that all the latest evidence that’s been reviewed in I think, at least, four or five meta-analysis in the last three years have shown no correlation between dietary saturated fat and heart disease.

Dr. Pompa:
That’s right.

Dr. Volek:
So that, I think, puts the nail in the coffin of the low-fat paradigm, the diet-heart hypothesis. But still, people get very concerned. Because on a ketogenic diet, now you’re eating two or three times as much saturated fat as you may have been on a high-carb diet, and so we’re interested in what happens to saturated fat levels in the body on a ketogenic diet. So in three separate studies now we’ve shown that, despite eating two to three times the level of saturated fat on a ketogenic diet, saturated fat levels in the blood go down.

Dr. Pompa:
Yeah.

Dr. Volek:
And again, that’s what’s important. Because if you are carrying more saturated fat in your circulation, in your membranes, that is highly associated and consistently in studies puts you at higher risk for heart disease. So the way—the soundbite we use for this is, “You aren’t what you eat. You are what you save from what you eat.” And if you’re eating saturated fat, that’s fine. Saturated fat itself is very benign and contributes to satiety and pleasure and palatability of food.

Dr. Pompa:
Yeah.

Dr. Volek:
What’s the problem is if you eat it with carbohydrate.

Dr. Pompa:
That’s right.

Dr. Volek:
It’s the carbs that you’re eating that are setting you up to store it and accumulate it in cells. But if you don’t eat a lot of carbs with the saturated fat, you actually burn it. Saturated fat is a preferred fuel on a ketogenic diet, and so it’s not accumulating and causing harm. It’s being oxidized and converted to CO2 in water, and that’s why you see actual levels go down despite the fact you’re consuming more.

Dr. Pompa:
Well, I think, talk it about…

Dr. Volek:
You need it. You need the saturated fat on a ketogenic diet for fuel, and those foods that have saturated fat are ideal foods on a ketogenic diet.

Dr. Pompa:
I love to give the example it burns like natural gas on your stove. You don’t see smoke as opposed to how glucose burns. You look at the wood in your fireplace. You need a chimney. That’s glucose.

Dr. Volek:
That’s great. Yeah. I think I’m going to steal that.

Dr. Pompa:
You’re welcome.

Dr. Volek:
Ketones and saturated fat, they’re clean burning fuel.

Dr. Pompa:
Yeah. Yeah. Absolutely and more efficient. That’s why those gas carbs can run a long time. They’re cleaner and more efficient.

Dr. Volek:
Absolutely.

Dr. Pompa:
Yeah, absolutely.

Meredith:
And I have a quick question too. I love what you’re saying about saturated fat, Dr. Jeff, and I eat a very high-diet myself, and my cholesterol is only 180. So I was wondering. Have you seen genetic differences in perhaps that some people are more suited to ketogenic diet genetically than others?

Dr. Volek:
Yeah. We were interested in that question about ten years ago before we had a lot of more sophisticated Omix tools. But we did a lot of genotyping in our studies, and there was a lot of hope and belief that genetics would be able to predict how people respond to diets. But we were very disappointed. You can explain a very, very small amount of variability by looking at genotypes in people. So I’m more interested in measuring now dynamically changing biomarkers because your genotype doesn’t change. Your snips are the same. What I’m interested in is studying more biomarkers that are providing almost real time information on how people are processing the carbs they’re consuming on a real time basis, and that moves us in the direction of someday having some objective markers that would tell us if we’re consuming carbs below our tolerance or above our tolerance.

So yeah, in answer to your question, the genotyping hasn’t really led to any insights in terms of responders or not. I find there’s very few, if any, contraindications to a ketogenic diet. So as we were saying earlier, some people may find it a little more difficult to get into ketosis and keto-adapt, but outside of some very rare genetic mutations, everyone can do it.

Dr. Pompa:
Yeah. We’re going backwards. Yeah.

Dr. Volek:
You may not need to. If you’re one of the lucky ones and you can maintain health on a high-carb diet, then you may not need to. But at least you can, and that’s where, if you’re insulin sensitive, you have more options. You can probably do fine on a higher carb diet. But if you’re insulin resistant and carb intolerant, you really need to restrict carbohydrates, but pretty much anyone can adapt.

Dr. Pompa:
Well, everyone can adapt because it’s life or death. I mean, every human has the ability to go in and out of ketosis, and I believe it actually makes us healthier just even moving in and out of it. Because this is what our ancestors had to do. Often times, they were in states of fasting, states where they only had this food or that, and it was forcing them into these variations. I wrote an article, Jeff. You should read it, called Diet Variation. I think you would enjoy it. It’s on my website.

But, yeah, I mean, I agree. Jeff, I think that there’s too much today put on these snips in the genotyping whereas, clinically, I’m just not seeing the value. I think that the snips, the body—we know so little that the body epigenetically starts to change things and move around these snips and adapt in different ways. And I think that even in the alternative world, I think there’s being too much put on that. What’s your opinion on that?

Dr. Volek:
Yeah. I agree totally, and that’s starting to go out of vogue, and epigenetics now is the big thing. Which as you were saying, it’s that epigenetics is really looking at how genes are expressed. And we learned just a couple years ago how potent ketones are at affecting gene expression. So a ketogenic diet is having very potent epigenetic affects.

Dr. Pompa:
Yeah, amazing.

Dr. Volek:
The primary ketone body, beta-hydroxybutyrate, was just recently discovered. This was in the science paper published at the end of 2012. So this is really new stuff, and it gives us a whole different perspective on ketosis. But they showed in very elegant experiments that beta-hydroxybutyrate was a potent histone deacetylase inhibitor, and that’s a long fancy term. But that’s a very common and well-studied target of epigenetic modulation of gene expression. And I can tell you a lot of drug companies are desperately trying to find molecules to develop into drugs that basically target the same mechanism, and here we have a natural metabolite that elevates when you restrict carbs that has the same epigenetic effects. So it’s really exciting, and it gives us a whole new perception of how a ketogenic diet is having therapeutic effects.

Dr. Pompa:
I think you said it. A lot of what I teach is turning off those bad genes. Whether you’re a thyroid person, someone who struggles to lose weight, those can be genes that can get turned on. We know utilizing ketosis and ketones turns off and has the ability to turn off those genes. I mean, this is new science, but it’s real science, and it’s very—it’s really amazing. And I believe that these dietary shifts, what I call diet variation, really lead to a lot of these bad genes getting turned off.

Well, anyway, so this is the performance side of the talk. I mean, you wrote the book, “The Art and Science of Low-Carbohydrate Performance.” Look, your colleague, Stephen Phinney, I met him here in Park City, and here in Park City, we are the endurance capitol, little city, of the world. I always say that people here either do one sport a day or three. So we have people who run in the morning, cycle in the afternoon, and go lift weights somewhere in between. They are the high-carb group here, Jeff. I mean, come on. High-carbohydrate diets and endurance, I mean, this is—how can it be low-carb?

Dr. Volek:
Yeah. It’s a little bit like the world turned upside down, and it’s interesting that this is going on in parallel with what’s happening in general consumer nutrition and taking on the Dietary Guidelines and all of the low-fat paradigm. In parallel, you’ve got sports nutrition over here that’s also for the last 40 years been under the belief that athletes have to carb load and have to have high-carb diet to perform optimally and recover, and now that’s being challenged.

Dr. Pompa:
Yeah.

Dr. Volek:
And so that is really fascinating because it’s been so reinforced by the sports beverage industry and economy that we’ve got to have these Gatorades and Powerades after we—even if we run on the treadmill for 15 minutes, you got to drink Gatorade, and we’re basically cancelling out all of the benefits we get.

Dr. Pompa:
Jeff, I can argue…

Dr. Volek:
So there’s paradigm shifting, and a lot of it is happening in the grassroots level. It’s real athletes that have made the decision to switch their diet and abandon their carb loading, and instead embrace a high-fat, low-carb diet. And to even my surprise, many of these athletes are not just able to compete and finish races, many of them are winning and, in some cases, setting course and even national records in ultra-endurance.

Dr. Pompa:
What’s the—the Western 100, what’s the gentleman’s name? Didn’t he win the last three years the 100-mile running race? He’s in ketosis. Correct?

Dr. Volek:
Yeah. Well, Tim Olson won in 2011, and I had my lab group out there. We were studying a whole bunch of athletes that were on a low-carb diet, and so Tim set a course record that year, and came back and won it again in 2012. And I think he’s definitely on a low-carb diet, whether he’s in ketosis or not may be debated. But there’s no doubt he’s not following the high-carb approach, and he’s not the only one. There are many successful ultra-endurance runners who are clearly abandoning their carb loading and benefiting from a high-fat, low-carb diet. And we’ve had the opportunity to study many of these elite athletes in the lab to see what makes them tick, and they are nothing but extraordinary.

Dr. Pompa:
Yeah. What’s the—Phinney was involved in the movie called “Running on Fat,” right? And the gentleman and his wife rode from California to Hawaii in ketosis, and that was the movie. Were you part of that at all, Jeff?

Dr. Volek:
Well, I know Sami Inkinen and Merdith Loring who are married and did row; I think it was 2,000 miles from California to Hawaii unsupported. And they really did that to show that it could be done without a lot of sugar and carbohydrates. So they were keto-adapted and did a phenomenal, unbelievable performance. Setting a record, actually, and beating out some three and four-man teams that they were competing against so just an enormous feat of endurance done with very little carbohydrate.

Dr. Pompa:
Yeah. What’s the name of the movie?

Dr. Volek:
It’s “Fat Chance Run,” was it?

Dr. Pompa:
Yeah.

Dr. Volek:
Or no.

Dr. Pompa:
I forgot too.

Dr. Volek:
Actually, I’m blanking on the exact title now.

Dr. Pompa:
Yeah, me too. I’m with you.

Dr. Volek:
Yeah. It was all about this paradigm shift in athletes switching from high-carb to low-carb diets and experiencing widespread benefits in terms of their health and performance and recovery abilities.

Dr. Pompa:
Yeah. It was remarkable. Well, Meredith, you had a lot of questions regarding performance because that little girl’s quite the athlete, and she performs on a very low-carbohydrate diet in ketosis often times so, Meredith.

Meredith:
Oh, well, I don’t know if I’d consider myself too much of an athlete, but ketosis has massively impacted me in a lot of positive ways. Something, first of all, what constitutes a ketogenic diet for athletes that you think would be well-balanced and well-formulated? Can you walk us through a day of what that would look like?

Dr. Volek:
Well, yeah, I think I could probably do that easier for a ketogenic diet where—I don’t know if these athletes, all of them anyway, are truly in ketosis or if they’re introducing enough carbs around exercise. There’s no standardized approach all these athletes are taking. They’re figuring out what works for them. So it is varied from athlete to athlete. But in general, what I consider a well-formulated ketogenic diet. Obviously, getting the carbs low enough to induce ketosis is kind of straightforward but, also, the protein. So this is not a high-protein diet, but it’s not a low-protein diet either. So you really need to get protein in the right range where it’s low enough, you induce ketosis. But it’s not so low that you’re going to be in the negative nitrogen balance. That’s muscle loss, the lean body mass loss. It’s kind of this Goldilocks state for protein, and that’s really important.

Beyond that, other things that people don’t always appreciate which can often result in side effects or suboptimal responses; one is the type of fat. So because carbs and protein are limited, this is a very high-fat diet, especially if you’re not restricting calories. So if you’re one of these athletes who’s trying to eat enough energy to maintain your training, this is an extremely high-fat diet and the type of fat becomes very important. Because the main function of fat is for fuel on a ketogenic diet.

Dr. Pompa:
Yeah.

Dr. Volek:
And the best fuels are the monounsaturated and the saturated fats. The polyunsaturated fats are important. They’re the essential fatty acids, but you only need very small amounts of these to meet your essential requirements. So they’re more like vitamins and minerals in my mind, and they’re not tolerated at high levels. So you can run into a lot of problems.

Dr. Pompa:
Okay, Jeff, for our viewers, let me just put that in perspective. So we don’t need as much fish oil, right? There’s benefits to those polyunsaturated fats, and vegetable oil, we don’t like anyway. But what you’re saying is, hey, we need more grass-fed butter. We need more of those types of saturated fats, and then of course, olive oils and other oils can have some other affects as well. So putting them in…

Dr. Volek:
Yeah, the natural foods that—natural animal-based foods that are higher in fat naturally have low PUFA levels. Where people run into problems is with soybean oil, and corn oil, and safflower oil, and peanut oil. And so it’s easy to not buy those, but where you end up seeing those is in salad dressings and mayonnaise. So it’s very difficult to find versions of those that don’t have soybean as the first ingredient. You’re now starting to see them pop up a little more. But that’s really important because it will make people nauseous if you eat a lot of soybean oil or a lot of mayonnaise that has soybean oil in it. So the types of fat’s important.

The other area is in mineral balance where you can run into a lot of serious problems if you don’t understand how to manage sodium on this diet. So a lot of people are afraid of salt. Because we’ve been told we eat too much salt, and we need to reduce it. It turns out that science doesn’t support that and it actually refutes that. If you restrict sodium, it may actually increase your risk for heart disease. But we won’t go down that path right now.

But definitely, when you’re in ketosis, the kidneys go through a very profound adaptation where they excrete more sodium, and it’s called the natriuresis of fasting or, in this case, the natriuresis of ketosis. And if you excrete sodium, you also lose fluid with that, and so that manifests in a contracted plasma volume or a reduced blood volume. And that’s what a lot of people feel as—and they call it the Atkins flu, or they feel lethargic or tired. They may get dizzy and faint when they go from a seated to a standing position. Some people, they get headaches, even constipation, and in most cases, they blame it on the lack of fiber or lack of carbs in their diet. But nine times out of ten, it’s the lack of accounting for that extra sodium that’s lost.

Dr. Pompa:
Absolutely.

Dr. Volek:
And you have to eat an extra gram or two of sodium on a ketogenic diet to maintain plasma volume, and if you’re an athlete, that’s especially important because it’ll affect your cardiac output and performance. And I won’t go into all of the nuances of this, but if you don’t address this, it’s not just those inconvenient symptoms. You end up with a counterregulatory response where you end up stressing the adrenal glands. Because the body wants to try to reabsorb sodium, you secrete aldosterone, and that causes you to retain more sodium at the expense of potassium. So you end up excreting more potassium. You end up in a negative potassium balance. And it’s impossible to gain muscle and even maintain muscle if you’re in a negative potassium balance, and it ends up affecting magnesium balance as well.

So you end up with all these mineral imbalances, and there’s one simple countermeasure. It’s just, have a little extra salt in your diet. So we recommend people consume broth, but it can really be any source of sodium to make up for that loss of sodium. So that’s another big component of a well-formulated ketogenic diet that can trip people up.

Dr. Pompa:
Yeah, I have—we acknowledge that fully, and I have something called my 2-2-2 Rule. Just to get the—make sure they’re getting the better fats. Two tablespoons of coconut oil a day. Two tablespoons of grass-fed butter a day, and two teaspoons of sea salt or some type of salt. So just to make sure some of those bases are hit. Because if you don’t make it simple for people, they just simply forget, right, and then they end up going I’m weak. I feel tired. My heart’s palpating. And it’s typically, like I said, one of those things, especially the electrolytes and the mineral imbalance, so very well said.

Jeff, I go into—and I said this earlier in the show. I said I go into ketosis in the summer. Why? Well, because I love cycling. I’m an endurance athlete. But when I do that, I lose my muscle very easily. I can eat muscle into sugar pretty quickly. However, when I’m in ketosis, I don’t. So two reasons, I keep my muscle, even though I do high-endurance in the summer, and I’m “bonk proof.”

I can literally get up. Not eat. I am even, partly, later in the day still not eating. I can go on a three-hour bike ride, and I do not bonk because I’m fat-adapted. So these athletes that—for me, even just at low-carb, I don’t have that effect unless I’m absolutely in ketosis, fat-adapted. Then I can run on fuel. And maybe it was you that said this, and I loved the analogy. Look, the average human can store about 2,000 calories in stored sugar. However, even as lean as I am, I have at least probably 80,000 stored calories of fat that I’m able to tap into.

And when I’m biking for all those hours without eating—because I didn’t eat through the night, and I didn’t eat through the morning, and I had went out with a group probably about noon one day. So I had already fasted 15 hours. We went out and rode for three and a half. I had not one bite of food, and I didn’t bonk. And they were astounded because they predicted my bonk. So despite going, whatever that was, 17 hours without food, even when we were done, I was still fine. That’s the beautiful part of being fat-adapted in ketosis.

Dr. Volek:
Yeah. You summarized it very well. That ability to be able to access and utilize your fat stores is one of the most important adaptations of a ketogenic diet, and that’s manifest in so many positive outcomes for these endurance athletes, including cognitive benefits.

Dr. Pompa:
Yeah.

Dr. Volek:
Because they become bonk proof, and their brains are able to utilize the ketones. So they remain very lucid, and don’t become disoriented at the end of these races, which is very common in the high-carb athletes.

Dr. Pompa:
Yeah. Another—I think the bodybuilders and the weightlifters are coming around to this. They usually went high-protein, but they’re realizing the benefit of being in ketosis. And I do something, Jeff, where I [00:56:48].

Meredith:
Dr. Pompa, looks like he’s frozen there.

Dr. Pompa:
Sorry. I don’t know what happened. My internet blipped out for a minute. Anyways, I don’t eat in the morning. I intermittent fast, and I benefit from my body’s ability to burn fat and keep burning fat whereas the old adage, I believe it’s old, is eat the five or six meals a day. We never give our body a chance to burn fat. When we’re fat-adapted, man, we want to give our body a chance.

And there’s two—and I’m not telling anyone to do this. Because the guys, they drop a lot of F-bombs. But they’re called the Hodgetwins, and these guys are built like houses, right? And they’re in ketosis, and they intermittent fast, and they go 19 hours without eating. And these guys are like, look, we do it without taking steroids. I mean, these guys are massive, and they’re boasting that it’s all about being in this intermittent fasting state in ketosis. And what it does for their growth hormone and testosterone, and that’s how they’re able to compete naturally.

If you want a kick, watch it, Hodgetwins, google it. But you better be used to a lot of F-bombs because they’re funny. They’re funny guys. I think they’re pretty smart, and it’s an act. But they do drop a lot of F-bombs. But they really—they prove the point that this raises hormones. It really makes you more hormone sensitive, even to testosterone.

Meredith:
Awesome. Well we got started a little bit late. So maybe we can have a Part 2 because there’s still questions.

Dr. Volek:
Absolutely.

Meredith:
And there’s so much on this topic. It’s really exciting, and your research is amazing. So do you want to tell our viewers how to find out a little bit more about you and your research?

Dr. Volek:
Well, I’m at Ohio State University now, and as you mentioned, I have a couple books. The most recent I wrote with Steve Phinney called “The Art and Science of Low-Carb Living,” and the companion to that for athletes is “The Art and Science of Low-Carb Performance.” So those are available on Amazon.

Meredith:
Awesome, great. Well, thank you so much for joining the show and for everything you’re doing. And we’ll definitely have to schedule you for a Part 2, and thank…

Dr. Volek:
I’d love to come back.

Dr. Pompa:
Yeah.

Meredith:
Awesome, awesome. Well, great to meet you. Thanks for watching everyone. Stay tuned next week. We’re going to be interviewing Ben Greenfield on low-carb fueling for athletes. So it’s going to be an awesome follow-up to this topic as well. We’re going to continue to delve more into this, and to get you guys the information you need. So thanks for watching everyone. Have a wonderful weekend, and we’ll see you next time.

103: Food Cravings and How to Control Them

Transcript of Episode 103: Food Cravings and How to Control Them

With Dr. Daniel Pompa, Meredith Dykstra, and special guest Dr. Sunny Ferrero.

Meredith:
Hello everyone and welcome to Cellular Healing TV. I hope you’re having a great day. This is episode 103. We have Dr. Pompa here, of course, and we have a special, Dr. Sunny Ferrero. It’s a really exciting topic today. We’re going to be talking about food cravings, and what’s behind them, and can they be trusted. Before we jump in, I’m going to tell you a little bit more about Dr. Sunny and then we’ll begin with this exciting topic.

For three years, thus far, Dr. Sunny Ferrero has been an enthusiastic professor of biology at Valencia College, at Rasmusen College, and Florida State College at Jacksonville. She’s taught a variety of courses ranging from human physiology to microbiology and has a particular interest in how all of biology fits together, and how one can apply even basic concepts to figure out what really causes mystery diseases for which causes are not really known. Dr. Ferrero received her PhD in Medical Sciences at the University of Florida after getting two bachelor degrees at [Rensselaer] in biology and phycology, but it was only after teaching for two years and refusing to accept a minor medical problem as normal and uncontrollable that she began to do real learning.

One of her favorite hobbies is tasting new foods, researching the chemical and medicinal compositions of food, and experimenting with the perfect diet. Thus far, her proposed model for such a diet is: number one , organic food only; number two, whole plants and whole animals as much as possible; number three, eat what you crave if the first two rules are being followed; number four, to taste new foods whenever possible. Thank you so much, Dr. Sunny, for joining us. How are you doing today?

Dr. Sunny Ferrero:
I’m awesome, thank you. How are you?

Meredith:
I’m very well, thank you. Dr. Pompa, how are you?

Dr. Daniel Pompa:
Great! I love this topic. I mean, here we have a biology degree and a psychology degree—I mean, come on; this could be the perfect combination, right? It was last week’s show we talked about how our thoughts affect our biology, right?

Meredith:
Yeah.

Dr. Daniel Pompa:
Our thoughts drive our chemistry, our physiology. So, here we are with the perfect person to answer a lot of these questions that I think most people have, Meredith. Are cravings good? Right? I mean, come on—women when they’re pregnant start craving different things, is that good? Are cravings in general good? Sunny, that’s the first question I guess we ask, is all of our cravings good?

Dr. Sunny Ferrero:
Not all of our cravings are good. It really depends on what kind of learning process has been done. With the type of food products that we have most available now, we’re more likely to be learning that the particular, say, dopamine releasers, for example, actually make you feel good, but the problem is that very often those foods don’t have the raw materials for making all the enzymes in the body. That’s why you need more whole foods, as in whole plants and whole animals, whenever possible, as opposed to, say, food product with just salt and fat in it, or almost just salt and fat because those two things are triggers that there might be some nutrients in there. Again, historically, that’s only true for whole foods. A whole animal has some fat on it with fat soluble vitamins, so your body might really be after not just the fat for the calories but the vitamins that go with it.

Dr. Daniel Pompa:
Okay. Basically what you’re saying is that there’s a place in our brain that says, okay, we want these two things that we know keep us alive, right? There’s this area that gets this dopamine rush. Things like sugar, and fat, and salt—I’m presuming—and sodium, and these types of things that will get this dopamine thing going in the brain and our brain says, ah, we like. However, those things—food manufacturers are trying to put those things in foods, right? They don’t necessarily have the other things that maintain life but it gives the dopamine high. Is that basically what you’re saying? Okay.

Dr. Sunny Ferrero:
Yeah. Exactly. On the manufacturing side, it gives the dopamine high and behaviorally and economically, for the companies, it encourages people to buy it. Those triggers are cheaper compared to including all the nutrients. Of course, that’s not true of all foods, all products, etcetera.

Dr. Daniel Pompa:
Let me ask you this—Meredith, you have great questions—I want to make sure we get to all this. I get so excited about these topics. Therefore, then, we can create these foods that we know excite the brain and be void of the things we need for good cellular health. These companies go, okay, we’ll just put those things in there and we get the rush. Now we literally become psychologically addicted to crave those foods. Meanwhile, we can be starving to death differently?

Dr. Sunny Ferrero:
Yeah. That’s happening. It even can, potentially, get worse because not only are we addicted to the triggers but because our body hasn’t taken in the complete package, all the vitamins and minerals, etcetera, the lack of those vitamins and minerals for most of them often makes the body feel run-down and tired. Since a lot of those vitamins and minerals we don’t have, per se, receptors for, our bodies haven’t really learned where to go get them, per se. That only comes from a lot of experience with having a good diet, unfortunately. I don’t like to just try new foods I like to experiment with whole long-term diets. I can tell you stories about mainly eating greens for at least a couple months, etcetera. That can tell you a lot about how you can use good cravings.

Dr. Daniel Pompa:
That was interesting because I read that you said that you went on just greens for a certain period of time and you started—correct me if I’m wrong—you started craving yogurt.

Dr. Sunny Ferrero:
Yeah.

Dr. Daniel Pompa:
Yeah. Your body knew that you needed something else and you got these yogurt cravings. Maybe it wanted acidity. I don’t know. Did you deduce what it was craving?

Dr. Sunny Ferrero:
My guess was that because greens, as a whole, often have a lot of alkaloids, a lot of basic chemicals in them. It could have been acid to balance it out, it could have been molecules that are more acidic to balance it out, proteins, sugars—or certain proteins, certain sugars, something like that—probably either sugar or acidity because I was also craving blackberries and yogurt.

Dr. Daniel Pompa:
It’s amazing. I preach and teach something called diet variation. Not go out and eat pizza, necessarily, but varying our diet. Really, our ancestors were forced to do that, Professor, right? Today we can just get caught up in the same eight foods all the time. Interesting. Meredith, you had some really amazing questions, I thought. I do want you to talk about—before we got on air, you told about a rat study where they really, I think, makes your point in this area. That we have the ability to seek out certain things—nutrients, but it’s harder with other things and we don’t have the receptors. We’ll get to that because I think it proves some other points, but, Meredith, I know you have some great questions for Professor Sunny.

Meredith:
Oh, thanks. Oh yeah, first of all, too, just to back up a little bit I did think of an interesting example as well when you were talking about whole foods and despite different foods being pulled out to eat that they would create and balance it. I also think, too, this in regards to eating whole animals—so few people eat whole animals anymore and not just the muscle meat but actually the organs and the skin. I’ve gotten really into eating organ meats recently. I just think that so many people are missing out on so many incredible nutrient-dense foods when they’re not eating the entire animal. Is it true that people are really throwing their bodies out of balance when they are only eating the muscle meat of animals?

Dr. Daniel Pompa:
Great question.

Dr. Sunny Ferrero:
Yes, absolutely. There’re a couple of things to talk about. There are the vitamins and nutrients to talk about in certain organ meats that you normally—when you look them up are mainly found in plants or most often talked about as being found in plants. In terms of the connective tissue that isn’t muscle meat like the skin, tendons, and sources of the collagen protein, muscle meat is mainly actin and myosin. Collagen is found elsewhere but it is still a protein. I have just been teaching anatomy recently and ran across the statistic again that about 25% of our protein in our body is collagen. Yeah, we can get those amino acids from other sources in our diet but the proportions are a little off. If we build collagen out of the amino acids that are in actin and myosin, muscle protein, our bodies are going to end up throwing some of those amino acids away. That eventually goes out through the kidneys, which works them a little bit harder but we generally waste it, it’s not as efficient. That might play a role in overall body efficiency—especially the vitamin issue. A lot of vitamins are found in organ meats.

Dr. Daniel Pompa:
It’s interesting that you say that because you think of the Hunza people, they would spend their summers eating mostly vegetables; the winters they would eat mostly meats, dairy, whatever that they—obviously it would last through the winter. They would eat the whole animal because like you said, in the whole animal—they were forced to eat the fat and the organs. They couldn’t waste anything to survive the winter. Therefore, there were a lot of the same nutrients that are in the vegetables, so if they didn’t eat whole animal they could become deficient.

Dr. Sunny Ferrero:
Yes.

Dr. Daniel Pompa:
Yeah. That is really an interesting concept of—once again, Meredith, I talk about this diet variation and how interesting that is. I couldn’t agree more, Dr. Sunny, that eating the whole animal, the whole plant, how important that is today. I’m a big believer in ratios, fatty acid ratios; people just taking fish oil. I’m a critic of that. I think that it works. It can work in an acute stage, almost like a drug, if you will. We can throw a lot of omega-3 down, regulate inflammation, but yet people staying on fish oil for lengths of time without eating fish. According to you, and you agree with me, that throws us out of balance.

Dr. Sunny Ferrero:
Yeah. Because fish, while it’s a rich source of omega-3’s, there are the unscientific term of “a zillion other things” in it, also, things—guess what? Things that we probably haven’t discovered yet. We’re always discovering things.

Dr. Daniel Pompa:
Yeah. It’s true. We look at a study where they throw a bunch of DHA at the people, and omega-3, and fish oil, and yeah, it regulates inflammation, but does the study go on to say what happens when people keep taking it? Of course, we know that it does cause omega-3 dominance, which has—bad things in omega-3 dominance. Anyway, I love that. I love that philosophy. I come from the same place. You had another great question on there that I want to hear the answer to.

Meredith:
Well, I have plenty of them. I was just thinking, too, Dr. Sunny, when you were saying at the beginning that you were eating a lot of greens for a while and your body was craving yogurt, so when you’re on a whole foods diet perhaps you can trust your cravings, but what about most of American’s out there who are eating a junk food diet, that are eating lots of pasta, and pizza, and chocolate, and salt, and having a lot of those common cravings because they’re eating a diet that’s crammed with grains and sugar? How are those cravings different? Clearly, those can’t be trusted as much, I would think, than if you were eating a whole foods diet. Can you speak to that?

Dr. Sunny Ferrero:
Yeah. On a mainly food product diet like you just described, for one thing their brain is probably mainly associating any craving with a past pleasurable incident such as, just simply, the release of dopamine. The problem is it’s not doing anything else for them. They’re still going to feel physically bad, even if they don’t realize they are. They’re going to have health problems, eventually, if they’re really not getting the nutrients, and their cravings are not as reliable.

For example, MSG is a very tasty substance, it contains the amino acid glutamate and we have a taste receptor for that. I know I used to love Dorito’s. I actually would still love the taste of Dorito’s, but the problem is you’re not getting any other nutrient. In higher than ideal amounts any nutrient can be even toxic, which MSG has a toxicity level. The cravings from someone eating a mainly food product diet—they’re not really going to tell someone where nutrients are as much as if they’re on a whole foods diet, even then it’s difficult enough. I can tell you a story, if you want, about where I couldn’t figure out exactly what I needed but my best guess was actually omega-6’s.

Dr. Daniel Pompa:
Yeah, tell it. Tell the story.

Meredith:
Yes, tell the story.

Dr. Sunny Ferrero:
This is when I was on—I already told you the story of I was mainly on greens for a few months and then I craved yogurt and blackberries. Actually, I did that at a shorter time compared to that but a separate time, a year later, I was on greens for long time. I threw in the yogurt and the blackberries, too, this time but then I had a craving once. The first thought that popped into my head was that it was a “junk food” craving. I was like, okay, that can’t be right. I need a specific plant or animal I’m craving, what is it? It’s got to be something. The first plant that popped into my mind—or plant-associated food was, oh, I could go for corn chips. I was like, okay, so maybe I need something in corn.

Dr. Daniel Pompa:
Amazing.

Dr. Sunny Ferrero:
It gets better. I was like, maybe it’s corn, but then I said—I always explore alternatives—I said, what else might fix the craving? Is it really something specifically in corn or could it be something else? I thought about it and then I thought, or a whole bird. I could go for a whole bird. I’m like, what do they have in common? I know omega-3’s and 6’s carry up the food chain, and birds—even on especially organic birds—eat mainly things like corn. Okay, maybe it’s omega-6’s; I don’t think it’s protein because protein content is different. Yeah, my best guess was omega-6’s there.

Dr. Daniel Pompa:
Yeah. That’s interesting.

Meredith:
Did it work? When you ate the omega-6’s, did that satisfy you?

Dr. Sunny Ferrero:
Yeah. The most available thing, because it was almost Thanksgiving I figured I’d wait for the family bird meal, but right away I had some corn chips. They were organic corn chips. It wasn’t the most intact corn possible but there was corn in there, and yes, that fixed the craving. I was like, I guess I over omega-3’d myself. Even the salad dressing—or even the salad oil I was using happened to be hemp oil, which is higher in omega-3’s compared to olive oil.

Dr. Daniel Pompa:
That omega-3/omega-6 ratio is really important. Our brain works, our cells work on that ratios. When that ratio gets out of balance our cellular fluidity is affected, how our brains are affected. There’ve been studies showing that it’s only this specific balance of omega-3 to omega-6 that actually can change the brain. Just giving fish oils alone isn’t the key to changing the brain. It is that ratio that really matters. It’s a ratio that’s just automatically found in balance when you’re eating these whole animals and plants, by the way. It’s uniquely enough.

Dr. Sunny Ferrero:
Oh, yeah.

Dr. Daniel Pompa:
Yeah. What about these pregnant moms that crave chocolate. I mean, come on, what’s going on there?

Dr. Sunny Ferrero:
When you said chocolate, specifically, I can pick on that one. One thing I remember is—well, chocolate’s very high in a lot of things, iron and copper, for example. Those are really important for making red blood cells. When you’re pregnant you have to make a lot of—a bunch of stuff, including that, so that’s probably what it’s doing. I’ve had chocolate cravings before, but at the time—the last time I had a chocolate craving I actually had the best form of chocolate. I had whole cacao beans. The whole ones are hard to find. The nibs are more common. I would normally eat one every other day just to remind myself they were still there, but one day I ate 20 in a row. I was like, why am I doing this? Then I looked at the calendar. Pregnant women have a wide variety of reasons, potentially, for craving certain things. I know that sometimes they’ll crave chalk. There’re calcium salts in there. You need to build skeleton. Even if they’ve never tasted chalk before, who knows what kind of association might be working? It’s white. We look at calcium-filled things that are white all the time, so maybe it was the color that attracted them to it.

Dr. Daniel Pompa:
What about people who—they eat dirt? I mean, they crave dirt, and they crave odd things. There’s a show that talks about these odd cravings. I tell you, it goes far beyond dirt, even in that they’ll eat borax. I mean, have you seen that show? What’s going on?

Meredith:
Yeah, freaky eaters -inaudible-.

Dr. Sunny Ferrero:
Oh, yeah.

Dr. Daniel Pompa:
Dr. Sunny, help us. What’s going on there in the brain? You’ve got the psychology and biology degree.

Dr. Sunny Ferrero:
Well, there’re a few different things. I mean psychology and biology are so heavily tied. On a lot of the cases of freaky eaters or picky eaters, it might be some psychological memory association that formed from an incident in their past. That would be the more experienced psychological part of it. I’ve also seen an episode that included someone who was very vigilant of their food. They were very picky. They got genetically tested. It didn’t go into detail in the show but compared to what they were expecting to find, this individual had an even more rare genome. They’ve actually never seen it before. Certain cases can be genetically programed.

On the eating strange things like dirt, etcetera, certain substances like dirt do have essential minerals in them. Who knows, to some degree it might be beneficial if there’s no bad pathogens in there, or harmful substances like lead, or something. I know that eating of lead paint is an occurrence, and it’s dangerous. One thing that they’ve seen from animal studies with cravings is that if an organism gets deficient in a nutrient and it’s not obvious where that nutrient is, usually if there no receptor for that nutrient, but they generally feel bad. One behavior that happens is that they start exploring different foods, trying things out. The learning process could take a short time or a long time depending on how deficient they are and how long it takes that nutrient to get used. Eventually, they could hit a food that fixes the deficiency and the craving. I have another story that actually relates to a surprising craving and possible deficiency I had, if you want to hear it.

Dr. Daniel Pompa:
Oh, yes, please. That also talks about the rat. That study that you and I are both familiar with, is they gave the rats thiamine deficient diet. They basically had to—I guess they eventually gave them something with thiamine, a feed with thiamine. Tell the rest of the story because I think it proves your point you just said. Then you can tell your personal story.

Dr. Sunny Ferrero:
They gave them a choice of the thiamine deficient food that they had been eating, which made them eat less and generally feel bad. Then they gave them a choice between that deficient food and an actual thiamine-rich food. They eventually figured out where the thiamine was. Since there’s no clear receptor for it, that might have taken a little bit of time. I actually don’t remember the details. There was that study, or another part of the study, or a different study that linked the thiamine-rich food with the flavor of a spice. I think it was anise. That helped them learn where the thiamine was. That tells you when we don’t have receptors for something, our brain links other characteristics of that food to what makes them feel good, from the nutrient. That’s another reason to retrain yourself with organic and whole foods because that’s the way food normally is, or should be anyway. Once you do that, then cravings become reliable. Your brain could use features such as the flavor of a corn chip or a roast bird to say that’s probably where the omega-6 was. I doubt I can taste omega-6’s.

Dr. Daniel Pompa:
Right. That’s your point though, is that certain nutrients, like thiamine or magnesium, there’s no receptors for it. Now, we have receptors for salt, we have receptors for glucose, we have receptors for all of these things. It’s the association—that even explains why people can eat dirt—because their brain’s associating the dirt with the deficiency because they don’t have a receptor for, say, copper.

Dr. Sunny Ferrero:
Yeah. That might be a more exploratory thing if they’ve never tasted dirt before. That’s my guess.

Dr. Daniel Pompa:
Yeah. Yeah, but I’m saying maybe they somehow ate some dirt, or on something, and then their brain—I don’t know—

Dr. Sunny Ferrero:
Made that.

Dr. Daniel Pompa:
Made that connection. Tell us your story. What was your story with that connection?

Dr. Sunny Ferrero:
My story relates to—well, actually, my story involves an essential nutrient that we do have receptors for, but for some reason my brain hadn’t recently, conscientiously, linked it as the problem. Somewhat recently I was eating good food so I assumed I wasn’t deficient in anything but I was feeling unusually fatigued and irritable. I thought, okay, maybe I need to eat something—but here’s the problem, I don’t know what it is. Then one day I accidently, or spontaneously, made a little exception to my organic rule and stole a couple of friends—well, borrowed a couple of friends French fries when we were going out to eat. I like them, and I thought to myself, okay, I know I don’t need starch or fat because I had been eating that. Is it the fact that it’s hot food? Do I psychologically associate hot food with wanting a good experience that hot food gave me before? I wasn’t sure. I also used a lot of ketchup, by the way.

Then, another day I had some organic salami—yeah, they do make organic salami—and I really liked that organic salami, but I don’t think I was craving protein or fat. I said to myself, I think I was actually salt deficient. I started looking at all the food I had been eating, sodium read 00000. That’s really rare in this society, so I wasn’t vigilant for salt deficiency. I just assumed I was going to get enough because I had salt at home, but the problem was I never used it for a long time. That was an interesting possible deficiency and a rare one. It’s easier to figure those things out when you’re on a diet you really are aware of.

Dr. Daniel Pompa:
Yeah. Do we have receptors for potassium?

Dr. Sunny Ferrero:
What about receptors for potassium?

Dr. Daniel Pompa:
Do we have them?

Dr. Sunny Ferrero:
I’m trying to think exactly where.

Dr. Daniel Pompa:
Anyways, my question is this: Could it have been a potassium deficiency where your body will use sodium to maintain a full amount of potassium?

Dr. Sunny Ferrero:
To be honest, I really actually think it was sodium chloride or one of those ions because I don’t know how much potassium there was on those French fries. That was a “go” signal for me when I had those French fries.

Dr. Daniel Pompa:
What’s the psychology? I mean, we’re talking about some physiological needs, right? You alluded to there are certain things in life that can create psychological desires, if you will. I know the psychology is tied to the physiology and we talked about that, right? What is some of the psychological addictions that people can have, starting with cravings?

Dr. Sunny Ferrero:
With regard to food cravings, it’s any kind of association, I would think, between—for example, if someone’s trying to get away from a bad feeling, a psychological, situational feeling, or a bad situation, and they eat something that quickly triggers dopamine release or some kind of neurotransmitter, they could associate that with a rescuing feeling or a good feeling. Then whenever a negative situation comes up again they could use that. That could definitely happen.

Dr. Daniel Pompa:
Sunny, I know that people, when they come off of drugs—or let’s use an easier scenario—smoking; they quit smoking, they crave something else that triggers the dopamine, right? The nicotine was firing dopamine, made their brain feel really good, that’s the addiction. Now, they stop and so now they start reaching for more sugar—something else that really stimulates that dopamine receptor. I mean is that part of the psychological craving addiction that can happen? That brain wants that stimulation and there’s nothing better than the sugars, and the salts, and the things that fire it.

Dr. Sunny Ferrero:
Yeah. Their brain’s definitely looking for a replacement for that good stimulus. The same is true with other addictions, other than cigarettes. Whenever something good goes away, the most efficient thing to do is replace it with something.

Dr. Daniel Pompa:
Right. People are addicted. When I ask about, why do you like the diet Coke? I’m on an airplane and people order the diet Coke—the answer is never because I’m addicted; the answer is never because I like it more, the answer is—no, the answer—I’m sorry, the answer is never to lose weight. The answer is, oh, I like this now more. When they started it they didn’t say, boy, I like the taste of this over the regular. No. It’s always like, gosh, the aftertaste. These chemicals are excitotoxins, meaning that they excite those receptors that we are talking about, create the dopamine rush, and therefore we want that diet Coke, or whatever it is. These new chemical exitatories stimulate what you said, that what has MSG stimulate, it’s a glutamate receptor which is the most stimulating receptors in the brain. These chemicals in food now are targeting that in our children. Therefore, now they’re addicted to those chemicals in foods and their brains finds those darn drinks in foods that all have these chemicals in it. It’s gone beyond just sugars and salts. It’s a new day and age with these chemicals that stimulate these receptors more than the sugar does.

Dr. Sunny Ferrero: and Meredith:
Yeah, we can—

Dr. Sunny Ferrero:
Sorry.

Meredith:
Sorry, go ahead.

Dr. Daniel Pompa:
No, no.

Dr. Sunny Ferrero:
I was going to say, with a problem like that I believe it’s possible to actually replace those conditioned cravings with good ones. I’ve gone through a lot of diet experimentation. I find a new favorite food or a new favorite drink and I stick with it for a while and then I find another novel food or drink, or a bunch of them, and I get conditioned to having such and such for breakfast, etcetera. Those things can be replaced in the form of organic whole foods, I think.

Dr. Daniel Pompa:
I have a client and friend who’s addicted to diet Coke—or, I’m sorry, Dr. Pepper.

Dr. Sunny Ferrero:
Mm-hm.

Dr. Daniel Pompa:
Dr. Pepper is the only thing that works, okay? For that person and for the people out there that have their addiction, whatever it is, how do we break it? What’s the answer?

Dr. Sunny Ferrero:
I would say in combination with exploring alternatives, if cold turkey doesn’t work, I would say slowly reducing that addicting substance. That might work better in terms of not increasing intake of it via a relapse. That’s my main take for that.

Dr. Daniel Pompa:
Okay, but then what? I mean, so, great—let’s say we can somehow go cold turkey, is there anything in addition to? What if they get sucked into another craving, therefore, addiction?

Dr. Sunny Ferrero:
Oh, like a different unhealthy one?

Dr. Daniel Pompa:
I’m just saying maybe, okay, great—she gives up Dr. Pepper, could she end up wanting something else very quickly, cold turkey here, but could she end up with sugar?

Dr. Sunny Ferrero:
Yeah. That’s why I think that can be avoided if you make some guidelines for yourself or stick with, say, the guidelines I put up for myself. For example, the first thing I did when I discovered all the harmful chemicals in non-organic food, unnecessary antibiotics, glyphosate the herbicide, etcetera, the first rule I said for myself was no foods that have extra antibiotics in them. Then when I discovered other things I said, okay, all the legal organic criteria make it so that I think I want to go pure organic. I was picky about it until at least I found all the basic food groups found offered in organic form in the store. The only things I put in my mouth were certified organic things. The French fry example I gave is a rare exception. That only happens about once a year in terms of like one mouthful. Usually it’s only if I feel I need to put something in my stomach. I’m not paranoid of non-organic food, but if I have a choice, no, I’ll stick with it, with organic food. No, I think that’s a good guideline to use. Also, step number two—as long as it’s a whole plant or whole animal—for example, if you think you’re going to take up a sugar addiction, if you have a sugar craving, go for a whole food that’s rich in sugar and the severe addiction to it may not happen.

Dr. Daniel Pompa:
Oh, yeah. What you’re saying is that if you start to gravitate to the better foods, the whole foods, you can then—your brain will start to pick up that these things are here and -inaudible- crave those things eventually. If you give up something this is the time to move to the better diet; obviously, the whole food diet, if you will.

Dr. Sunny Ferrero:
Oh, yeah.

Dr. Daniel Pompa:
By doing that you’re making better associations here as you’re moving away from the association here with the negative food. If you just try to get rid of the negative food and not switch to whole food, you can be in trouble.

Dr. Sunny Ferrero:
Oh, yeah—because then you have nothing to eat.

Dr. Daniel Pompa:
You have no associations. Your brain is not saying, okay, get it over here now, right? You’re going to end up gravitating to another bad food.

Dr. Sunny Ferrero:
Yeah. Exactly.

Dr. Daniel Pompa:
You almost have to do these things simultaneously. By the way, yeah, we are haters of glyphosate because of what it does to our gut, what it does to our brains, and our good gut bacteria. Meredith, you had some other great questions that need to be answered.

Meredith:
-inaudible- as well would be the glyphosate. I’m just wondering how the state of our microbiome impacts our food cravings. Can you speak to that?

Dr. Sunny Ferrero:
Our little gut bacteria need to eat, too, and different species survive best off of different foods. For example, we are used to having, or we should be having a certain amount of fiber in our diet. Our good gut bacteria can eat some of that fiber, and that’s what feeds them. If we’re eating more sugar than fiber, or cellulose, then the bacteria that survive best off of sugar will predominate. Our bacteria have been shown to synthesize amino—certain neurotransmitter precursors from scratch and they’ve actually been seen going up the vagus nerve directly from the gut. Somehow they might be directly influencing our cravings based on what they want.

Dr. Daniel Pompa:
I mean, just in review, our gut bacteria, our microbiome can influence cravings, so if you have a bad microbiome that could start craving bad foods. I know this from cravings, people that at the cellular level are sugar-burners only with the hormonal inability to use fat for energy—because your cells can only use sugar or fat, right? They crave sugar because otherwise they have to break their muscle down into sugar. Your body doesn’t want to do that. It would rather give you a craving for the thing that needs to make energy because it really is not efficient at using fat. Therefore, it drives a craving that way. Our microbiome can drive a craving, deficiencies can drive cravings, psychological things can drive cravings—so, there’re four things.

Meredith:
That’s what you said about the craving, or the deficiencies, as well. I’m wondering—you had spoken to this a little bit earlier how chocolate might be connected to some deficiencies, or the craving for chocolate, but do you have any other specific cravings that you associate with specific deficiencies, specific foods?

Dr. Sunny Ferrero:
From personal experience?

Meredith:
Or just your research.

Dr. Sunny Ferrero:
Oh, okay. Let me see. I made a little list here but I hit some of those stories.

Meredith:
-inaudible- chocolate. I know you had said—I forget what you had said, it’s associated with a deficiency. I was thinking maybe a magnesium deficiency as well.

Dr. Sunny Ferrero:
Oh, yeah.

Meredith:
-inaudible-, right?

Dr. Sunny Ferrero:
Yeah. Magnesium—yeah, that happens, too. The only other thing I noticed, I actually couldn’t figure out exactly why. It might have been a zinc deficiency or something. One time I was craving, specifically— well, on that note it probably wasn’t just a zinc deficiency—I still can’t figure it out. I was craving bivalve mollusks. Clams, oysters, a squid—I didn’t want a squid, I didn’t want a steak, I didn’t want a fin-fish, I wanted clams or oysters, etcetera. That’s still a mystery.

Dr. Daniel Pompa:
Bivalve mollusks. Only a biologist would describe it like that.

Dr. Sunny Ferrero:
Yeah. No, I can’t think of any others off the top of my head that I’ve had.

Meredith:
You don’t know of any other specific food cravings that are associated with specific deficiencies? I’m just curious about that.

Dr. Sunny Ferrero:
I’m just drawing a blank here. Cravings, deficiencies—well, on the mollusk example I know that if someone craves meat and fish, etcetera, it could be zinc because oysters, etcetera, are high in that, that’s an example. Actually, on second thought that I might have been craving zinc because even though I didn’t want steak, etcetera, oysters are higher in zinc, so my body could have been going for that. My guess is there may be some indirect way to detect a folate deficiency. Someone could crave greens. I’ve actually done that before; not severely because I always have greens. The subject of folates is interesting. Not a lot of researchers know that—or put in their papers that folic acid is, just apparently, one out of many different chemicals that are classified as folates. I don’t know if you have any questions about that.

Dr. Daniel Pompa:
What do you mean by that? I’m not sure where you’re going with that.

Dr. Sunny Ferrero:
I read that there’re several different chemicals that are classified as folates, but they’re all different. They all appear to work together to appropriately synthesize DNA. I say that because there have been papers done on folic acid overdoses, or higher than normal levels actually causing cancer. At a certain level they can prevent it. There has yet to be documentation of folates from whole foods causing a problem. I just thought I’d mention that.

Dr. Daniel Pompa:
That brings up the topic of the methyltetrahydrofolate, right? The MTHFR gene. I see people dreading the gene. My gosh, I get the emails all the time, well, I have the MTHFR gene, as if they’re doomed. My thing is, is look, 15-20% of the population have this snip on the gene and yet the—and they’re fine—the body figures ways around it. Meredith, I want to do a whole show on this, eventually. What you’re saying, interestingly enough, too, is, possibly, what does the body do with the folate is the interesting question.

Dr. Sunny Ferrero:
They don’t fully know.

Dr. Daniel Pompa:
Right. That’s why I said this is a very complicated topic. I am a homozygous MTHFR and I never really had the typical methylation issues, even though I had toxic issues. It’s a topic that I really think we need a lot more research on. I believe that the body will figure out ways around these genetic snips. Folate, like you explained, is a very complicated topic just from a nutrient level. Interesting. Go ahead, Meredith, I can tell you have a question.

Meredith:
Oh. I was just thinking as far as this is—back to the food cravings go, the impact of exercise, and the type that we do, and the intensity, would that have any effect on our food cravings?

Dr. Sunny Ferrero:
Probably because there’s all different types of exercise and energy expenditure; admittedly, I’m not a huge expert on that. I do a lot of walking, that’s my main type of exercise. That’s one area, unfortunately, I don’t tend to think about that often.

Meredith:
Yeah. Interesting. Great.

Dr. Daniel Pompa:
I think when we look at this topic, we know psychological cravings, there’re obviously physiological cravings, we’ve discussed them all but all in all, Dr. Sunny, what is the best way to make our cravings good? I think most American’s are stuck with bad cravings from a psychological and a physiological point. If you had to give our viewing audience one general thing to bring yourself to good cravings—I, like you, I have these things I know what I’m craving. My cravings are real. I’m down in with my innate intelligence; I vary my diet, I get what my body needs based on the cravings. It’s because I’ve been eating a diet for so long that’s good, but what’s your advice?

Dr. Sunny Ferrero:
My advice first is to actually get on a diet that’s good. It takes some commitment but it’s easy if you think about it. I’m not sure what keeps people from doing this. Sometimes people will go for certain fad diets or say, oh, I should avoid fat, which isn’t really a good idea, in a general sense. I think, if you follow the two rules of certified organic for all the foods, follow the legal organic criteria, and that’s pretty much the only kind of stuff you’ll put in your mouth. These criteria are for, example, no synthetic herbicides, no antibiotics. There’s a symbol to look out for. People don’t know about—there is a symbol on these foods or food products that mean organic. They should first look up what that means. I only eat organic foods. That’s rule number one for me. Then, rule number two is, with rare exceptions, like if you want a little oil and vinegar on your salad, just exceptions like that, whole plants and whole animals—except obviously plant parts that are poisonous, which can happen. Whole plants and whole animals, that way you’re getting the right proportions of nutrients. Two rules: Organic and whole foods. Then rule number three, follow your cravings if you’re doing those first two things. The cravings should be reliable.

Dr. Daniel Pompa:
I love that. Three rules, right? You’re right, those ratios and proportions are very important because when they’re off you start to go in different directions at the cellular level. Yeah, those three things—I love it. The third one, you only follow your cravings when you follow the first two.

Dr. Sunny Ferrero:
Yeah.

Dr. Daniel Pompa:
That is great advice.

Dr. Sunny Ferrero:
It is so easy for people to forget those first two rules.

Dr. Daniel Pompa:
Yeah.

Dr. Sunny Ferrero:
I said those three rules to one of my students once, just in order—it only took me three seconds to tell her the three rules. Right after rule number three, follow your cravings, she looked at me and said, oh, that means I should eat donuts and pizza? I said, what did I just say? What were the first rules? A donut, even if it was organic, it’s not a whole food. I have yet to make an organic donut.

Dr. Daniel Pompa:
Habits are when your brain starts to—your psychology, your thoughts in your brain start to equal your body. When these two are equal, that’s a new habit. You might want to give it 21 days to 30 days so these two equal out, and then trust your cravings because -inaudible- first, right? You’re going to start doing these thing—okay, I’m following the first two, but I’m still craving my jelly donuts, or whatever the heck you’re craving. Give it 21 days to 30 days to create this equaling this, which is a new habit, and then I think you’re safe on following rule number three. That’s great. Meredith, do you have any follow-up questions?

Meredith:
No. I mean, I’d just have to say I agree. I know in my past when I eat a standard American diet I had cravings like crazy all the time. Since changing my diet and really exclusively focusing on whole foods, lots of plants and whole animals, really I had very few cravings. I’m wondering, too, I guess I’m thinking to myself, I have so few cravings is there something wrong there? Should I be having some cravings? I noticed a dramatic decrease in cravings since massively increasing the fat in my diet. What do you have to say about that?

Dr. Sunny Ferrero:
If you’re getting the fats from whole plants and whole animals like an avocado, or organic chicken skin that you just baked, it’s probably because—especially if you have healthy mitochondria and can use those fats for energy—you’re probably getting also a lot of the fat soluble vitamins. That’s what your body’s really after, so you crave fat less if you get fat without those fat soluble vitamins with it. Refined fat, for example, in fast food, your body thinks it needs more because it feels bad because the vitamins aren’t there.

Dr. Daniel Pompa:
Yeah. I think that’s the original point you made. Meredith, I would say that you’re pretty balanced, right? You’re saying, hey, should I be craving some of the things? No. I think that you’re pretty balanced, that’s why you’re not craving certain things. I think the important part of it is that, yeah, we can crave certain things that—salts, sugars, fats—and if there’s no nutrients involved we’re creating deficiencies. We’re satisfying our brain; this is not equaling this, right? We’re satisfying the dopamine, getting the rush, doing our addictions, and we’re developing sickness at the cellular level. Eating whole foods, the way we’re talking about, protects us. These ratios, the fat ratios, the nutrient ratios, are all in balance. Therefore, you’re not going to get cravings, Meredith. Right, Sunny?

Dr. Sunny Ferrero:
Yeah. Exactly.

Meredith:
It’s exciting, too, because it’s empowering that people no longer have to be victims or slaves to their cravings. If you’ve checked over your diet, if the right amount of whole foods, whole plants, whole animals, the right amount of fat, you don’t have to have these crazy cravings that can make your life miserable. A lot of people are dealing with that. There is a choice.

Dr. Daniel Pompa:
Thank you so much, Dr. Sunny. We’ve had a lot of suggestions to do a show on cravings because a lot of people have them. It’s why they fail on diets, or vice versa. Give it 30 days, folks. Follow her two rules—three rules. Give it 30 days doing her two rules and then apply the third.

Dr. Sunny Ferrero:
Which is a lot more fun.

Dr. Daniel Pompa:
It’s a lot more fun. Yeah, so, that’s great. I think it was some great advice there. Thank you, Professor, for joining us. Hey, we’re so glad to have you on our team. As far as when we need some things researched, Meredith, that’s who you fire it off of, our biochemist/psychologist.

Dr. Sunny Ferrero:
It’s a good combination.

Dr. Daniel Pompa:
It is a great combination for our show because we know that this controls this, and this feeds back into this. Thank you. You’re welcome again on this show. Thank you, Dr. Sunny. Thank you, Meredith.

Meredith:
Oh, thank you, Dr. Pompa. Thank you Dr. Sunny. Remember everyone—this is a recap—organic food only, whole foods and whole animals as much as possible, then you follow your cravings. Thanks so much, Dr. Sunny; Dr. Pompa, wonderful as always. Everyone have a great week and we will catch you next week for episode 104. We’re going to be interviewing Dr. Jeff Volek. We’re going to be talking about low-carbohydrate fueling for athletes. It’s going to be an awesome show, so all you athletes out there, stay tuned for next week. Have a great weekend. Thanks for watching.

Dr. Daniel Pompa:
It’s possible, I do it! Wait till you hear the science. Talk to you next week. Bye.

Dr. Sunny Ferrero:
See ya.

102: Emotional Healing and Retraining Your Brain

Transcript of Episode 102: Emotional Healing and Retraining Your Brain

With Dr. Daniel Pompa, Meredith Dykstra, and Phil Kaplan.

Meredith:
Hello everyone, and welcome to Cellular Healing TV, Episode 102. I have Dr. Pompa here and we have a special guest, fitness guru, Phil Kaplan. How are you guys doing?

Phil:
I’m doing great.

Dr. Pompa:
Fitness guru? I think he’s more than that these days, but he is a fitness guru, isn’t he?

Phil:
I’ve evolved passed the fitness guru.

Meredith:
I know. I threw that in. I don’t even know why I said that. It just kind of came out. He’s so much more.

Dr. Pompa:
That too.

Phil:
I have ascended. It’s been an ascension.

Meredith:
Yep, you do. How are you guys doing? I know I’m here in Pittsburg, but you’re in sunny, beautiful Florida. How are you doing down there?

Dr. Pompa:
It’s not so sunny; not so beautiful today, but we’re good.

Phil:
It’s a beautiful 72 degrees, and there’s no snow.

Dr. Pompa:
In Park City, Utah, where I’m usually doing show, they got another foot and a half of snow last night.

Meredith:
Oh man. Do you go skiing out there?

Dr. Pompa:
Yeah, I would be skiing. I think that the kids are out powder skiing and I’m missing it.

Meredith:
Wow. Well, it’ll be there when you return, I’m sure.

Dr. Pompa:
I used to do a radio show called Mind Body. Was it Mind Body?

Phil:
It was not Mind/Body.

Dr. Pompa:
Was it Muscle Brain?

Phil:
It was The Mind and Muscle Fitness Hour.

Dr. Pompa:
See, I got all the words. The Mind and Muscle Fitness Hour. You’re right. He has evolved from the fitness guru. Today, he really is the mind guru.

Phil:
I’ll tell you where it came from, because at first, I thought I was speaking to people in the gym – people who work out. It was a radio show, so I was talking about muscle, but when I went to a seminar, I realized it wasn’t only people who work out who was coming. Everybody was coming from every walk of life, and they would say, “I need to start. I tried but I failed. I can’t. I can’t. I can’t. I realized that mindset is such a vital piece of it, so it became Mind and Muscle Fitness Hour, and that’s part of why I studied mindset so much, because I realized if I’m going to help people get better, I’ve got to get in here.

Dr. Pompa:
You actually studied psychology. This was your big thing. You really dug deep in the subject.

Phil:
I started in college. I took psychology 101 and I was excited about it, because I always wanted to learn how to influence people. I was fascinated by influence. I was really disappointed with the class because we learned about Sigmund Freud, the Oedipus complex, and B. F. Skinner, but nothing that had to do with influencing people. I liked the optical illusions. I think it was page 222. They had optical illusions. The teacher would talk, but I was so bored, I would just look at the optical illusions, but I said, “This isn’t what I wanted to learn.”

Independently, I found the work of someone named William James. He was kind of a rebel, and he coined the phrase, “will power,” so when people talk about will power now, that’s where it came from. I started reading his work and it stared resonating with me. It said we all have will, it’s just do we take the power to access it?

That took me on the beginning of a different course, and then I started learning from experts in influence, some conventional, some unconventional. I did get a very different education than I think college would have led me to.

Dr. Pompa:
Take us into this topic. Why on Cellular Healing TV do we have the mind expert? The body you all can get, but the mind why?

Meredith:
Right exactly, and you gave kind of a great intro on to today’s topic, which is emotional detox, and really the impact that emotions have on our health. I know it’s been proven in science how our emotions affect us at the cellular level, and the massive impact that our thoughts have on our physical state of being. Why do they have such an impact? Let’s start there.

Dr. Pompa:
Let’s go to the expert on this question.

Phil:
You’ve heard it said, “We become what we think about.” That has evolved. We can go all the way back to 15th Century and earlier. There was an awareness of this concept, “We become what we think about.” What we focus on is what we’re drawn to, and there are two words that I find are really limiting for people. Those are can’t and but. They really mean the same thing, because when somebody says, “I’d like to, but I can’t.” Whenever they use that word “but” that’s really what they were saying. I’d love to be able to exercise. I’d love to be able to do what Dr. Pompa says but – and as soon as that word comes out, it’s their mind putting a limitation on their potential, so sometimes getting rid of those blocks is incredible in getting people to develop a greater sense of potential, and with that sense of potential, of course, their potential escalates.

We know thousands of stories about people who first had the belief and then achieved it, but it really is cellular. It is physical, and that’s what is really important for people to understand. It’s not just we think differently, so we behave differently, although that’s true; we think differently and our endocrine system changes. Our cellular makeup changes, and ultimately as Dr. Pompa shares, our DNA changes. There’s such an unbreakable link between mind and muscle or thought and outcome. I think people need to understand that if they really want to get well or they really want to get better.

Dr. Pompa:
You know, Meredith, I don’t coach as many people as I used to, and one of the things that I do is I look for people who really want to get well. Let me put it a more important way – who believe they can get well and what to get well; have the thought process ready to get well. I do, I have to interview people, because there was a time in my young career that I thought I could get everyone well, and I would get very frustrated, because I would expect a lot of people to do what I do, and certain people would have a lot of “cant’s” and “but” around that. I would always analyze my own efforts and my own coaching.

Phil:
I think until you understand it, you believe them.

Dr. Pompa:
I was taking it hard.

Phil:
We have to figure it out differently, because you can’t fail to realize then, is they can’t because they are telling themselves that.

Dr. Pompa:
I do; I had to sift through those people. Not everybody is ready to get well, whether they don’t believe it or whether it becomes their identity and they literally have fears to losing who they are. No one ever admits to that, do they? No one every goes, “Yeah, I’ll just hold on to who I am. I’m just afraid. I want to stay here.”

Phil:
I want to share this, but we just came back from a mindset conference that we both spoke at, and I gave an illustration of why people repeat the habits that they know are wrong. Why do people still smoke? Nobody thinks it’s healthy. We can talk about addiction. We can talk about the need, but there’s a recurring mindset pattern that draws people back to behaviors that are familiar to them, and this happens beneath the conscious level.

Even though somebody thinks, “I want to quit,” unless they break the ritual and break the ritualistic thinking, they get caught up in that loop. Whether somebody is sick and wants to get well or whether they’ll well and want to be better; whether they’re an athlete and want to perform better, they’ve got to change their thinking, because their thinking got them to where they are. When somebody says , “I want to change,” they may really mean that, but if they’ve been through this ritualistic behavior that leads them to failure, they don’t believe it’s possible. They have the hope, want, and desire, but they don’t have the mindset.

Dr. Pompa:
Meredith, let me bring it back to you. When we speak of emotional detox, these are the things that we’re talking about, meaning changing your thoughts to literally change your DNA at the cellular level and therefore change actually who you are and then that’s going to create different habits, different behaviors, and different feelings; that’s feelings that we get because of our behaviors, then really change our life, but also they feed back and even cement a new you if it’s a good feel. That’s what we mean by emotional detox. We can go in a million different directions, but I know you have a lot of questions.

Meredith:
Yes. I think a lot of us can understand too. We know that we shouldn’t be repeating these negative behaviors, but where do we begin. Okay. We know we need to start to change these patterns, but how do you start? Where do you begin the process of emotional healing? What does that look like?

Phil:
I think it’s as individual as a prescription for somebody to get healthy. We really have to look at where they’re stuck and help them get past it, but I’ll tell you where I see it start very often. I think the medical system supports this, and I don’t think it’s a good thing. Meredith, have you ever had a runny nose and cough at the same time and somebody say, “Hey, what’s going on?” and you go, “I am a cold.” Do you ever do that? I am a cold. I have become a cold.

Meredith:
No, I have not said those words, no.

Phil:
You would say, “I have a cold,” because you know that you’re going to pass through and come out the other side, right? When it comes to what we’ll call chronic disease of the 21st century, people are labeled. I am hypothyroid, so all of a sudden there’s a new identity. In that moment of diagnosis, there’s an identity that different than our identity before. I am depressed, not I’m having depression and I’m going to get better, but I am depressed. When you start to wear that, “I am,” that starts a loop of thinking; how can you possibly be anything else if this is what you are?” Sometimes it starts with identifying that. Where are they stuck?

I’ll also tell you that, and we spoke about this, people can go through 10 years of psychoanalysis of deep psychotherapy and they can unload stuff that they’ve been holding on to for years and they can cry and they can purge, and they can get better.

My question to Dr. Pompa was, when they get better – when the thinking actually changes; when they stop holding on to that stuff, did it happen in a moment or did it happen gradually over 10 years? I suspect it happens in a moment, so if that’s the case, if we can find a shortcut to that moment, can we bypass the 10 years?

I’m not saying there’s anything wrong with the10 years, but who wants to wait that long? That’s what I’ve been looking for. How do we find techniques to make that change happen and to make that switch flip so you don’t have to go through the back and forth and the back and forth and the back and forth? I found some really powerful ways of doing it in my own life. Unexpectedly, I had to rely on that.

Dr. Pompa:
I wanted to go there actually, because I think that right now, Meredith, people are saying, “Okay, I hear what they’re saying.” Our thoughts become reality. Dr. Bruce Lipton, we’re going to have him on a future show, correct?

Phil:
That’s right.

Dr. Pompa:
Lipton wrote a book called The Biology of Belief. I think I’ve spoken about it in the past, and really what he and now others have proven is that our thoughts literally can drive cellular inflammation, which then drives our DNA. Our thoughts, therefore, according to – this isn’t my opinion or his at this point, this is solid evidence – literally, our thoughts then change ourselves – this is Cellular Healing TV folks – therefore, change our DNA. Our cells then start producing different proteins. Folks, we are proteins, hormones, and neurotransmitters. That’s who we are. Every flesh and everything we are is protein, so therefore it creates a new you. This literally creates new feelings and who we are, ultimately even healing, because it’s a new you at the cellular level. We can create with our thoughts, inflammation in bad cells and bad proteins and bad hormones or we can change our thoughts. We can then change our DNA and change our thoughts and who we are.

I know that some of you are having trouble, but you brought something up at the end. Let’s bring it to our own experiences. Meredith, I got well. I emptied my bucket using true cellular detox, right? I got rid of my causes in my life. I got rid of the sources that were bio-cumulated in my body and my cells. I got my energy back. I was sleeping through the night. My digestion wasn’t tolerant to foods anymore. All these things are better; however, I was still allergic to chemicals, if you will, allergy. How about this: I’m still sensitive to chemicals, meaning I would be fine, and then I would get a whiff of perfume and all of a sudden I would be brain reaction. I’d get a reaction.

Then, I would go into a new hotel and I would get headaches and I wouldn’t sleep that night, so this became my new reality or my new me, better, but yet these sensitivities with these odd reactions. Phil had come back from understanding what he already knew. We’re fighting it even further and gained an understanding that these are neuro pathways that we set up, and I knew that. I read some of the stuff, but I didn’t believe it quite yet, because I got better by removing chemicals, but Phil gave me some stories and I said, “Great, I’ll try it.”

Being frustrated because I had still had these four chemicals that I was reacting to, I did it. I changed my thoughts about how I thought about these chemicals. There were neuro pathways set up, so the example, Phil, that I love to give is this: Meredith, if a lion walked in that room, how would you respond?

Meredith:
I’d be scared. I’d run.

Dr. Pompa:
Would your body give you a physiological reaction?

Meredith:
Oh, I’m sure it would, yeah. I’d go into fight or flight mode.

Dr. Pompa:
That’s right. What would be some of the physiological things you’d experience?

Meredith:
Nerves, sweating.

Dr. Pompa:
What about your heart, would it go?

Meredith:
Heart racing.

Dr. Pompa:
Anxiety – and after the lion left, would you still be left with some that feeling?

Meredith:
It lingers for sure. It can take a while to calm down after a traumatic event, for sure.

Dr. Pompa:
Physiological?

Meredith:
Yes.

Dr. Pompa:
Maybe there was just a perceived lion or a real lion. We don’t know, but no matter what –

Phil:
– or a nice one

Dr. Pompa:
Or a nice lion; either way you’re brain perceived it as danger. That’s what mine and your brains were doing. We were better, but our brains were perceiving the chemicals as danger, danger, danger, creating the same physiological influences and even driving cellular inflammation. There were neuro pathways that were literally genetically grown. The question then is can we alter and make new nerve pathways? Phil?

Phil:
Yes.

Dr. Pompa:
How?

Phil:
You’re asking me the hard question. I want to tell you when I had that realization, because I got sick from mold and it took me a while to find out what caused it, but once I did, I got well quickly, but then the chemical sensitivity became really challenging.

Dr. Pompa:
Mine was mercury driven and his was mold driven. We were both left in the way. We got rid of our toxin, but we were both left with the same sensitivity.

Phil:
Right, so I built a new house, a beautiful house, and I was getting sick in the house. I knew there was no mold. It was brand new. I made sure there was no mold, and that’s around the time that we met, and I invited you to my house and you walked in and you said two words. Do you remember what they were?

Dr. Pompa:
Attic.

Phil:
Attic air.

Dr. Pompa:
Attic air.

Phil:
The air was coming in from the attic and it’s the chemicals that were affecting me. I couldn’t understand why the chemicals were affecting me. I knew mold affected me, but why the chemicals? I studied and spoke to doctors, read books, and I went to everybody from rabbis to priests to psychologists. I needed to understand this. Then, it hit me.

I was sitting on my balcony and I just saw a crow, and I had this thought: The crow in a fire. Imagine if you’re in a fire and you’re going into that mode. Your heart is beating faster and you’re going into that adrenal response, cranking out chemicals, and there’s a crow in a fire, and you’re trying to get out and trying to get out and trying to get out, and finally you get out. The next week, you see a crow and you get that response because your brain associated it.

What’s interesting in my history is the mold was in my office. My office was destroyed by a hurricane, so they rebuilt the office but they didn’t change the air ducts, so all of the rotten air sat in those ducts and grew mold. The office looked beautiful, but as I’m getting sick, they put in new carpet, new paint, and new drywall. Chemicals were coming at me. My brain linked the two. It associated the chemicals with the reaction, so I realized if my brain can do that, can I unlink the crow from the fire? That’s where the search took on meaning, because once I made sense out of that, now I thought there’s got to be a solution. I just have to disconnect. Can you do it? Yes, absolutely, and probably you can go through 10 years of therapy, but that wasn’t the path that I chose.

I learned about something through neuro-linguistic programming call thought stopping, and it sounds ridiculously simple. It is simply this: Stop. When a thought is going through your head, it is cyclical and it’s a pattern, and in neuro-linguistic programming, they call it pattern interrupt, interrupting the pattern. It’s almost as if you’re giving a speech and I dump a bucket of water on you. Suddenly, you stop and say, “What was that?” My brain hears the stop, because it comes out of my mouth, and there’s at least a little bit of hesitation. I can pause it and then it kicks back in.

The trick now is, how do I rewire, because the neurons that fire together wire together? A chemical started a path of neurons that led to the adrenal response.

Dr. Pompa:
It’s called a neuro network that takes place.

Phil:
We know this. Your brain does not know the difference between something real or something vividly imagined, which is why you can have a dream and in the dream you have this reaction, wake up, and you’re thinking about. You still have the reaction. You have to then relax. You have to tell your brain, “Wait a minute; that was just a dream.”

If I could take myself to a different outcome in my mind and my imagination, I can create a new chain of neurons. Neurons that fire together wire together. Here’s this loop pathway that I want to break. I can interrupt it, but where does it go from here? I want to create where it goes from here.

At first, I started using memories, because they’re in my hippocampus. They’re in there in the file cabinet, so if I can remember and I can make it so real, then my brain and my body actually go there. It’s sort of like if you’ve ever heard a song during an intimate moment in your life, years later you hear the song and you’re taken back there, right? When you smell perfume of somebody you dated years ago, it comes back. That memory was in there. I just needed to make it vivid enough so my brain goes, “Oh, this is really happening.”

Stop was followed by the memory, a really powerful, strong memory, and it took focus and concentration. At first, it wasn’t easy, because that old pathway wants to pull you back in. Stop; the great memory.

Dr. Pompa:
The great memory, because doesn’t emotion tie memory even deeper. If you think back to all the worst moments of your life, do you remember those, folks? Of course you do. It’s deep neuro patterning. Basically, you’re doing the opposite. We’re creating the good memory with that possible back experience – chemical or whatever it is.

I remember the first time I tried it. I’m going to be honest with you, I was skeptical. I’m a physical guy. I’m the guy who gets detoxed.

Phil:
Me too; this was hard for me.

Dr. Pompa:
I had to prove it to myself. I was pumping gas. Gas would crush me, Meredith – the smell of it. I would be wrecked for hours if not a day. I smelled it. My immediate response – I started feeling the feelings. I said, “Whoa, stop.” I’m in control of it. I literally visualized the pathway first, realizing that I can go around this same reaction. I stopped. I associated it with a time when I was younger. I actually liked the smell of gas. I reminded myself that I actually love this smell and then I immediately went to all these good experiences in my life.

I can tell you, it worked the very first time. I did get some head tingling. I sat in my car and I just kept it thinking on those thoughts, those pleasurable thoughts. You know what? Time went by and someone called me on my phone, and then I realized, “Oh my God! I didn’t get the reaction.” That’s when I knew I had a victory. Of course, there are four other chemicals or three other chemicals and I started applying it. I can be hit with chemicals today, even those four, and I don’t have a reaction.

Phil:
If 15 years ago I was watching this show, I probably would have turned it off.

Dr. Pompa:
Me too.

Phil:
It’s hard to accept, especially if you’re grounded in the physical.

Dr. Pompa:
Absolutely.

Phil:
I went through that process too, but it was that crow in the fire recognition, and that was just my own thing in my own head, but suddenly, I said, “This is true,” but I accepted that it’s physical. The pathways are physical.

Dr. Pompa:
It is physical.

Phil:
When neurons fire together, and once I accepted that it was physical, now I was ready to take it on, because it fit right in with my belief system.

Dr. Pompa:
This was a great example this weekend. Of course, we knew the pattern, but I thought this is a great example: I said to Phil, “There’s no hamstring machine.” We were actually working out. He said, “Oh, do this.” He put a ball on the ground. He had me get straight with my feet up on the ball, and I started shaking back and forth. My nerve system was not accepting it right away, and then you even had me do it with one leg. The point is this, in about five minutes, or less than that, it stopped shaking.

What happened? It’s called neuroplasty. I was really developing new neuron connections, new chemicals, and then, Meredith, every one of you watching this have experienced that. You’re riding a bike and you’re doing this and that. You’re shaping neuro connections. This neuro network is forming, and now you can ride a bike. Now I was balancing on the ball, so that’s all you’re saying.

Phil:
That’s it. That worked for me. You know, it’s funny because I too started experimenting. I remember I was in Boston and I wasn’t familiar with the neighborhood. I want to go smell perfume, because I want to test myself and this perfume was a trigger for me, and anybody who has been chemically sensitive knows that, but anybody who has never been, has hard time understanding it. They go out and it must smell really bad, and you run away. It’s not that. It’s a major reaction where your body starts to shut down.

Dr. Pompa:
It’s real.

Phil:
You all stood up with fear with that. If somebody got in an elevator and had perfume, I would go into panic mode. Once I figured this out, I went looking for a place to go. There was a TJ Maxx. I said I’m going to go in there and find a woman with perfume and smell it.

Dr. Pompa:
TJ Maxx itself –

Phil:
I’m walking around the store and I’m sniffing women. Thank God I didn’t get arrested, but I’m walking up to them. I find perfume, and I was walking next to her and testing myself. In my head, I’m going, “Stop, stop, stop,” and thinking of a good memory, and then I flew home on a plane and I’m sitting next to a guy who had really horrible cologne. I loved it, because it was a perfect test for me, because for two and a half hours, I’ve got to sit next to this guy. I think he thought I was gay, because I kept leaning into him, but he was like, “What are you getting so close to me for?” It was like a victory. I was like, “Wow, this really works.” However, it didn’t stick. In other words, as long as I’m consciously doing it and going to that memory and going to that memory and going to that memory, but the next day, I have to do it again.

Now, the question became, “How do you make it stick?” Then, I learned something amazing. We can use future memories. That doesn’t make any sense. How could it be a future memory if it hasn’t happened yet? Again, your brain doesn’t know if something is real or imagined, so if I can imagine something strong enough; if I can make it vivid in my mind – multisensory, using vision, auditory cues, and feelings, my hippocampus takes it on as a memory. If I can do it repeatedly, it takes it on as a memory.

The beauty of this was, I now had a new pathway. It wasn’t going back to the memory that was temporary, because as soon as I come back to the present, I’ve left that memory, but now it was where I’m headed. That became exciting to me. It literally created new pathways and that’s the way I got out of that loop. I have, thankfully, helped a great many people with that, not only going from sick to well, but with a change in their behavior, change their life, and in changing their outcomes.

Dr. Pompa:
I’m going to do a plug here real fast, because, Phil, you’ve also done it in people who are trying to become successful. You used to do that in the fitness world, now you also do it for doctors. You do it for our doctors. You have a program called Be Better that literally is training people to think, because I always say that you are where you are in life because of your thoughts. No doubt. Here we are. We know our thoughts and behaviors have created the life that we live. Can we create a better one? Can we get the life of our dreams of being well? The job you want? The career you want? The relationships you want? The outcomes? That’s what Be Better is about.

Phil:
Be Better is an eight-month program, so what I’m sharing now, because we’re limited on time, and you asked these specific questions, is how you short cut it, but there’s a lot of science that underlies this. When we talk about mindset, everybody knows the words. It’s kind of like metabolism. People know the word, but if you ask them to define it, they sort of dead stop. They don’t really know what it is. Again, being learned in the physical – physicality – you have to make everything physical.

There are three parts of mindset – this has really helped me and this is what I share in the Be Better program – one of them is called the EEM, or emotional experiential memory. It is exactly what it sounds like. It’s emotional based on an experience.

Dr. Pompa:
I was bit by a chow, and when I see chow I have to go through this. Is that the EEM?

Phil:
It is the EEM, and it’s not rational. EEM is not rational. In a moment, it makes a decision to protect you. That’s its role. It’s going to protect you. The EEM learns in that moment chow/bad. Never again are you near a chow.

Dr. Pompa:
Chows do bite a lot of people. You should be careful of those chows.

Phil:
They’re making little love chows; so we’re not saying all chows are bad. It forms this association and it’s very similar to when a child touches a hot stove. They never do it a second time, because the EEM goes, “Don’t do that again.” The EEM has a really important role.

Dr. Pompa:
It depends on the child. Okay, go ahead.

Phil:
It depends on the child.

Dr. Pompa:
My child has probably done that twice.

Phil:
Maybe once with each hand – “Let me see if it burns with this hand.” The EEM is trying to protect you and that’s important. We need the EEM. It keeps you safe, but a very restrictive EEM creates but and can’t.

Dr. Pompa:
In fear and they’re stuck in life.

Phil:
There are people who will work in the same job, sit in a cubicle from 9:00 to 5:00, because the EEM says this is safe.

Dr. Pompa:
It can keep them from getting well.

Phil:
Sure, and as a matter of fact and I don’t want to go down this road, but some people find benefit in their sickness. In that, the EEM says this is safe, even though it’s not what they want, it says, “Stay here because this is safe. You’re going to put yourself at risk if you step outside of the zone.”

If we were ruled by EEM, we’d all be stuck in your homes and we’d never go anywhere, but there’s another part of the brain, the prefrontal cortex. That is where adventure lives and where possibility lives. The only way you can think of an imagined outcome is by accessing the prefrontal cortex. The prefrontal cortex has great ideas if you let it. It’s going to go, “Whoa, look at that building! That’s so high. Maybe you could jump off it. That would be fun.” Then the EEM goes, “No, that’s not safe.”

You’ve got to have this very healthy tug of war, so when somebody is goal oriented, they’re going into the PFC and saying, “I think I’m going to start my own business,” and the EEM goes, “It’s a risk.” Somehow there has to be a tug of war, but without that PFC pulling, nobody ever goes forward.

Mindset really has a lot to do with that tug of war between EEM and the PFC, and if the EEM rules, they get very stuck, whether they’re sick, unhappy, or just stuck in a place they don’t want to be, that emotional experiential memory tells them to step out of this and there’s danger.

I think an example that some of you would be able to relate to is if you’ve ever been in a relationship and you said, “This is true love, and I’m giving myself completely. Nobody has ever seen me this bare emotionally. I’m completely giving my heart.” Then you get screwed over and your heart breaks. The EEM says, “Giving yourself that much equals heartbreak,” and it doesn’t let you do it again unless you can get the PFC strong enough to go, “Maybe there’s something better.”

There’s an elegant example of how it limits you in life unless you recognize the power of that balance.

Dr. Pompa:
Is that where you’re going to have to create that future memory, if you will?

Phil:
Yes. You cannot create the future memory without accessing the PFC.

Dr. Pompa:
Whether it’s getting well; whether it’s being chemically not sensitive; or whether it’s where you want to go in life and business –

Phil:
Whether it’s completing a marathon or winning the race –

Dr. Pompa:
Is that the same in a boy or is it more in a girl?

Phil:
It’s more in a girl. At the Super Bowl, two teams show up. They both have the same goal, so one of those teams is going to miss. We sort of accept that a goal is an attempt that we may miss. A future memory is a certainty. When you brain holds on to a memory, it knows it to be true, so if you trick your brain in to thinking something that has happened yet, it’s very simply that. It’s a memory that’s yet to come and now it becomes a certainty. It’s more than a goal.

Dr. Pompa:
You made a big impact. I’ll say this one thing then I’ll hand it over to you. You made a big impact in my life, just getting me to think better. I’m always trying to be better. I always want to be coached to be better. I do it. I preach it. I always do what I preach.

We didn’t discuss this, but I know that you’re taking on some practitioners in Be Better. When is the next Be Better? I know I have a lot of practitioners that watch this show. Is there a way that they can contact you? How do they contact you, because right now if you’re helping practitioners, they’re out there going, “Yeah, I need that training. I need that mindset training.”

Phil:
I didn’t know we were going to do this.

Dr. Pompa:
I know.

Phil:
Through my e-mail address.

Dr. Pompa:
Hey, Meredith, maybe that’s it. Maybe they can contact you and you can give them Phil’s e-mail address, okay?

Meredith:
Yeah, okay. Meredith@drpompa.com. Just send that over and I’ll get you in touch with Phil.

Dr. Pompa:
Don’t bombard him with a bunch of questions. If you’re a practitioner of any type watching this – is that right?

Phil:
Yes. There’s something interesting that I’ve learned in working with fitness professionals, chiropractors, and health practitioners. They’re driven first by heart, as you are, right? As you are Meredith and as I am.

Dr. Pompa:
Yes.

Phil:
We want to help people. We want to make a difference for others. We want to make other people’s lives better, and that is a blessing.

Dr. Pompa:
It’ll get you into trouble.

Phil:
It also limits us, because we tend to shy away from things like selling, because we think salespeople are greedy, and they only care about themselves, so the altruistic health professional usually hates the concept of selling, and they hate the concept of doing things for money, because it goes against the heart, right? They want to be the altruistic person.

Dr. Pompa:
That is every doctor in America.

Phil:
Yeah, so it’s a little like the starving artist syndrome. They somehow take an odd pride in saying, “I’m helping people and I’m not getting paid what I deserve, but I’m helping people.” That’s a huge part of what Be Better does. It releases them from that, and it learns that it is a phenomenal thing, not just an improvement, a phenomenal thing to make more money by bettering the lives of others. Then, if you get a nickel only for making somebody’s life better, when you have $5 million in your bank account, that’s a whole lot of lives that you’ve changed. We have to form that association that if you run your business from your heart, then you certainly deserve reward.

The other piece of this is, until you get what you deserve, you can’t all the people that you could help. I meet a lot of health practitioners who don’t have time. They don’t have time. There’s too much going on. They have to pick up the pieces. There’s too many patients, but they are limited now the life they’re living. Again, it’s that loop, so if we can free them of that, now maybe they can do seminars, talks, write a book, and write articles and reach masses of people.

Dr. Pompa:
You’ve helped so many of my doctors that we coach. We have a message that we know the world needs. We do things that are unique; true cellular detox; everything that we do, the ancient healing strategies. Right Meredith? We see these doctors stuck. It’s like, “No, you have the answer. You have the answer,” and yet they’re so stuck. It would be great to help people. Meredith, you’ve got a question I know what pressing.

Meredith:
It is a responsibility once you have this information for the practitioners to get it out to the world. Shifting mindset is such a huge piece of all of this. I was thinking too when you were talking about creating future memories. I’ve been taking some notes and some amazing nuggets of information. How does visualization come into this? A lot of people out there talk about, “Visualize your future; visualize all of these amazing things happening.” How does this tie in with creating future memories.

Phil:
It ties in immensely. Again, that’s a road we don’t have time to go down right, but there are so many studies. We could literally speak for two days straight about the evidence of the power of visualization.

Dr. Pompa:
Just tell them one story about the scientists you’ve partnered with, with the older people. They walked into the thing – one group visualized and one experience.

Phil:
I love it when he says tell the story and then he tells the story.

Dr. Pompa:
I’m not telling the story; it was one of those past stories.

Phil:
I think I could give hundreds of studies, but there’s this repetitive process that they go through where they take two groups and one group does the thing and the other group visualizes the thing. It’s been done with foul shots. It’s been done with piano players. Inevitably, the group that visualizes but doesn’t do the thing, improves as much if not more than the group that is doing the thing. Is visualization helpful? Yes.

We are all different in many ways. We’re all the same, but we’re all different. We all communicate and learn through vision, sound, and feelings, but when I say we are all different, we tend to favor one more than the other two. Some people are more visual people. Some people are more auditory people. Some people are more kinesthetic people.

What I’ve learned is, if you’re working with somebody who is very kinesthetic – kinesthetic people, when you ask them a question, they pause, and if you’re visual, you want the answer right away. You’re watching and you want to see their mouth move. You want the answer, but kinesthetic people pause, and the reason they pause is they can’t give you the answer until they get in touch with their feelings. If you’re trying to get a kinesthetic person to visualize, it’s almost like you’re speaking Japanese to someone who doesn’t speak Japanese. For them, it might be, how would it feel, so there is this individual element. It’s not only the vision. It’s the vision, the sound, and the feeling and the more multisensory you can make that future memory, the more you mind believes it.

That’s the whole idea. With your eyes closed, your eyes are seeing the vision, so your brain is going, this is really happening, so visualization is incredibly valuable; however, the most important piece is to associate emotion. When we do a visualization exercise, and I’ve seen a lot of people do it in many different ways, and they often come out of it relaxed. Okay, we’re going to count backward, and you’re going to feel relaxed. That’s good, but what I do is I have them end it with a celebration in their mind. I want them to see the celebration, and then I want their physiology to reflect it.

When I take someone, their eyes are closed and if this vision or sound or feeling is strong enough, they literally leave the room. They’re no longer in their body. They’re living whatever it is they’re imagining. In that moment, I can get them to be very unguarded. I’m going to say, “Okay, now, here’s what I want you to do. I want you to appreciate the emotion. Make it bigger and turn it up. However you feel about it, if it’s a 10, I want you to make it a 15, and when it gets to a peak, I want you to celebrate. I want to see your celebration dance.” They come out of it, and their eyes open up and they say, “Wooo! It’s spring.” That’s what cementing it in. It’s the emotion. The visualization is absolutely important, but I think if we’re really going to work to bring about change, we’ve got to capitalize on all of this, and emotion is a huge part of it.

Dr. Pompa:
I think because all of us have a little bit auditory, visual, and kinesthetic in us, some people are pushed more one way than the other, so hitting them all is going to make that neuro pathway connect.

Meredith:
Yeah, and that makes a lot of sense. Wow, what a powerful technique. Making a visualization, there’s so much more in detail as well, so we can really, really feel that in conjunction with creating future memories, that’s an amazing strategy, and I love what you talked about earlier in the episode too, the stop thinking. It’s so simple but so profound. I’ve been taking notes, and I’m excited to implement some of these strategies as well.

Dr. Pompa:
We just came from training doctors this week, and I watched the impact and breakthroughs. It was remarkable. Honestly, I’ve watched it with people with health issues. The chemicals will drive the DNA and create bad proteins, hormones, etc. Chemicals do that, which is true with detox, but thoughts do the same thing. We’ve got to change thoughts if we’re going to make a new you. That’s what this is about. I think we have to have Phil back on for part two of this. Would you agree?

Meredith:
I think the same thing, because this is such a huge topic, and there’s so much more to it all. I have more questions, I know you guys don’t have a lot of time today, to really continue the conversation, but this is great.

Phil:
I want to add two more things before we wrap it up. One is, I’ve been watching your right earring, and it’s dangling and it looks beautiful. The other one is not moving so much.

Meredith:
It’s probably the light.

Phil:
I like your earrings.

Meredith:
Thank you.

Phil:
The second thing is, there are often many roads that lead to the same place, so I know that when I do talks, I get e-mails. I get phone calls, and people saying, “Well, I do tapping,” or “I do emotional release,” and there are always different techniques, and I don’t condemn any of it. I say, “If it works for you, great.” I’m not saying this is the only way. Here’s what I’m saying. This is the way that worked for me. This is the way that works for me consistently, and this is the way that I’ve been teaching other people to improve their lives.

Dr. Pompa:
I’ve seen it work.

Phil:
It happened, like I said, in a moment. It doesn’t happen the moment they saw it. It happens the moment the pathway changes. We can make that happen relatively quickly if they’re willing to be all in. If you’re guarded and you kind of half visualize, but your brain is going, “This can’t be possible,” you’re not going to get there, but once you get there, switch flicks and your life changes.

Meredith:
Wow. How exciting. It gives us a lot of power and control in our lives.

Dr. Pompa:
This is a big topic, but don’t go bombarding Phil with e-mails if you’re a practitioner or doctor, watching this, he opened that up to you, and you’ll give them your e-mail. Meredith, you can give them that one more time, and we’ll wrap it up, but we’re going to have a part two, I promise, because this is a road block for many people getting well where they want to be in life, and really the new you. We really can shape our futures based on our thoughts, no doubt.

Meredith:
It’s so exciting. Thank you so much for sharing. If you’re a practitioner watching and you have any questions, just contact me at Meredith@drpompa.com. I’m excited for part two, so thanks guys so much, and have a great rest of your day. Thanks for watching everyone.

Phil:
It’s been fun. Thanks Meredith.